Automated Organization Profile

Federal University of Piauí

Current S-Index

27.5

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

1.4

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

19

Total datasets in this organization

Average FAIR Score

57.4%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

7

Total citations to the organization's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the organization's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Code on Demand: A Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Understandability, and Self-Correction Capability of Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini - Data resulting from the study

Este conjunto de dados foi gerado como parte do estudo "Code on Demand: A Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Understandability, and Self-Correction Capability of Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini - Data resulting from the study". O estudo focou na avaliação do desempenho das ferramentas Copilot, ChatGPT e Gemini, utilizando problemas do LeetCode em quatro linguagens de programação: Python, Java, JavaScript e C.O conjunto de dados atualizado está organizado nas seguintes pastas:c_programs: Esta pasta contém os scripts Python utilizados para calcular a complexidade ciclomática e a complexidade cognitiva do código C gerado pelas ferramentas.calculate_cyclomatic_complexity.py: Script para calcular a complexidade ciclomática.calculate_cognitive_complexity.py: Script para calcular a complexidade cognitiva.codes_suggested_by_the_tools: Esta pasta contém as sugestões de código geradas pelo Copilot, ChatGPT e Gemini para cada problema do LeetCode.Subpastas: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, cada uma contendo as sugestões de código correspondentes nos formatos das linguagens.complexity_of_codes: Esta pasta contém dois arquivos CSV que fornecem os resultados da análise de complexidade para o código gerado.AI analysis results table - Cognitive.csv: Resultados da complexidade cognitiva do código gerado.AI analysis results table - Cyclomatic.csv: Resultados da complexidade ciclomática do código gerado.Este conjunto de dados atualizado oferece insights valiosos sobre o desempenho das ferramentas de geração de código com IA e pode ser utilizado para análises futuras ou estudos de replicação.

Authors

  • Batista, Samuel Silvestre Silva
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.5281/zenodo.13885244October 2024

Code on Demand: A Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Understandability, and Self-Correction Capability of Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini - Data resulting from the study

Este conjunto de dados foi gerado como parte do estudo "Code on Demand: A Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Understandability, and Self-Correction Capability of Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini - Data resulting from the study". O estudo focou na avaliação do desempenho das ferramentas Copilot, ChatGPT e Gemini, utilizando problemas do LeetCode em quatro linguagens de programação: Python, Java, JavaScript e C.O conjunto de dados atualizado está organizado nas seguintes pastas:c_programs: Esta pasta contém os scripts Python utilizados para calcular a complexidade ciclomática e a complexidade cognitiva do código C gerado pelas ferramentas.calculate_cyclomatic_complexity.py: Script para calcular a complexidade ciclomática.calculate_cognitive_complexity.py: Script para calcular a complexidade cognitiva.codes_suggested_by_the_tools: Esta pasta contém as sugestões de código geradas pelo Copilot, ChatGPT e Gemini para cada problema do LeetCode.Subpastas: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, cada uma contendo as sugestões de código correspondentes nos formatos das linguagens.complexity_of_codes: Esta pasta contém dois arquivos CSV que fornecem os resultados da análise de complexidade para o código gerado.AI analysis results table - Cognitive.csv: Resultados da complexidade cognitiva do código gerado.AI analysis results table - Cyclomatic.csv: Resultados da complexidade ciclomática do código gerado.Este conjunto de dados atualizado oferece insights valiosos sobre o desempenho das ferramentas de geração de código com IA e pode ser utilizado para análises futuras ou estudos de replicação.

Authors

  • Batista, Samuel Silvestre Silva
0 Citations0 Mentions77% FAIR1.7 Dataset Index
10.5281/zenodo.13901119October 2024

Code on Demand: A Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency, Understandability, and Self-Correction Capability of Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini - Data resulting from the study

No description available

Authors

  • Batista, Samuel Silvestre Silva
0 Citations0 Mentions77% FAIR0.8 Dataset Index
10.5281/zenodo.13885245August 2024

Additional file 1 of Transcriptomic analysis of benznidazole-resistant and susceptible Trypanosoma cruzi populations

Additional file 1: Table S1. Characteristics of the reads that remained after the removal of low-quality data after Trimmomatic analysis.

Authors

  • Lima, Davi Alvarenga ;
  • Gonçalves, Leilane Oliveira ;
  • Reis-Cunha, João Luís ;
  • Guimarães, Paul Anderson Souza ;
  • Ruiz, Jeronimo Conceição ;
  • Liarte, Daniel Barbosa ;
  • Murta, Silvane Maria Fonseca
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.23084016January 2023

Additional file 1 of Transcriptomic analysis of benznidazole-resistant and susceptible Trypanosoma cruzi populations

Additional file 1: Table S1. Characteristics of the reads that remained after the removal of low-quality data after Trimmomatic analysis.

Authors

  • Lima, Davi Alvarenga ;
  • Gonçalves, Leilane Oliveira ;
  • Reis-Cunha, João Luís ;
  • Guimarães, Paul Anderson Souza ;
  • Ruiz, Jeronimo Conceição ;
  • Liarte, Daniel Barbosa ;
  • Murta, Silvane Maria Fonseca
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR2.1 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.23084016.v1January 2023

Additional file 3 of Transcriptomic analysis of benznidazole-resistant and susceptible Trypanosoma cruzi populations

Additional file 3: Table S2. Enriched transcripts for biological process category with Gene Ontology-assigned terms.

Authors

  • Lima, Davi Alvarenga ;
  • Gonçalves, Leilane Oliveira ;
  • Reis-Cunha, João Luís ;
  • Guimarães, Paul Anderson Souza ;
  • Ruiz, Jeronimo Conceição ;
  • Liarte, Daniel Barbosa ;
  • Murta, Silvane Maria Fonseca
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR2.1 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.23084022January 2023

Additional file 3 of Transcriptomic analysis of benznidazole-resistant and susceptible Trypanosoma cruzi populations

Additional file 3: Table S2. Enriched transcripts for biological process category with Gene Ontology-assigned terms.

Authors

  • Lima, Davi Alvarenga ;
  • Gonçalves, Leilane Oliveira ;
  • Reis-Cunha, João Luís ;
  • Guimarães, Paul Anderson Souza ;
  • Ruiz, Jeronimo Conceição ;
  • Liarte, Daniel Barbosa ;
  • Murta, Silvane Maria Fonseca
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR2.1 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.23084022.v1January 2023

Production of pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings using carnauba bagana as substrate

ABSTRACT Sugarcane seedling quality is strongly influenced by the substrate used. Currently, alternative substrate sources from the sugarcane industry itself have been used; however, there is no specific substrate to produce pre-sprouted seedlings. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of pre-sprouted sugarcane using substrates with different proportions of carnauba bagana (0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 %) plus soil. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and five replicates. Pre-sprouted seedlings cultivated using substrate composed by 80 % of carnauba bagana showed the best response for number of leaves, diameter, shoot length, shoot, root and total dry mass, and Dickson Quality Index, owing to the improvement in the substrate physical and chemical characteristics.

Authors

  • Leite, Marcos Renan Lima ;
  • Costa, Romário Martins ;
  • Matos, Sâmia dos Santos ;
  • Andrade, Hosana Aguiar Freitas de ;
  • Silva-Matos, Raissa Rachel Salustriano da
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.2 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.22121297January 2023

Production of pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings using carnauba bagana as substrate

ABSTRACT Sugarcane seedling quality is strongly influenced by the substrate used. Currently, alternative substrate sources from the sugarcane industry itself have been used; however, there is no specific substrate to produce pre-sprouted seedlings. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of pre-sprouted sugarcane using substrates with different proportions of carnauba bagana (0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 %) plus soil. The experimental design was completely randomized, with six treatments and five replicates. Pre-sprouted seedlings cultivated using substrate composed by 80 % of carnauba bagana showed the best response for number of leaves, diameter, shoot length, shoot, root and total dry mass, and Dickson Quality Index, owing to the improvement in the substrate physical and chemical characteristics.

Authors

  • Leite, Marcos Renan Lima ;
  • Costa, Romário Martins ;
  • Matos, Sâmia dos Santos ;
  • Andrade, Hosana Aguiar Freitas de ;
  • Silva-Matos, Raissa Rachel Salustriano da
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.2 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.22121297.v1January 2023

Additional file 5 of Transcriptomic analysis of benznidazole-resistant and susceptible Trypanosoma cruzi populations

Additional file 5: Table S4. Transcripts that were not enriched for biological process category without Gene Ontology-assigned terms.

Authors

  • Lima, Davi Alvarenga ;
  • Gonçalves, Leilane Oliveira ;
  • Reis-Cunha, João Luís ;
  • Guimarães, Paul Anderson Souza ;
  • Ruiz, Jeronimo Conceição ;
  • Liarte, Daniel Barbosa ;
  • Murta, Silvane Maria Fonseca
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR2.1 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.23084028January 2023