Automated Organization Profile

SUNY Polytechnic Institute

Current S-Index

10.5

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.8

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

13

Total datasets in this organization

Average FAIR Score

33.0%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

3

Total citations to the organization's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the organization's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

US EPA Twitter posts from 2013-2014 and 2017-2018 (Version: 3)

This dataset refers to posts made by the US EPA on Twitter (https://twitter.com/epa) during the years 2013-2014 and 2017-2018. Twitter (now X) was selected as one of the major social media platforms that government agencies use to communicate with the public. This data was analyzed for several discourse categories (e.g., speech acts, sentiment, expressives, actors, etc.) in a content analysis described in publications associated with this dataset. As of March 29, 2019, the EPA Twitter account had produced over 15,000 tweets and had over 595,000 followers. For reference, as of March 14, 2024, the account had about 623,000 followers. This data refers to a sample of all posts (not retweets and replies) made during the first 16 months of Administrator Gina McCarthy and the first 16 months of Administrator Scott Pruitt.

Authors

  • DePaula, Nicolau
0 Citations0 Mentions69% FAIR0.4 Dataset Index
10.5061/dryad.573n5tbhx2025

Measuring trust in one’s physician: A scoping review (Version: v0)

Trust in one’sphysician drives positive health practices. However, the conceptualization and subsequentoperationalization of trust have become clouded due to the multitude ofapproaches that have resulted in several different measures with varieddimensions and indicators. The objectives of this scoping review were: 1) toidentify those measures of trust, whether newly created or refined in the last10 years, whose reliability and validity had been studied, 2) to compare thoseinstruments’ conceptualizations, dimensions, andindicators, and 3) to discover any new developments in the measurement of trust.This researcher conducted an electronic search of three databases (PubMed,SOCAB, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers screened those selected studies andextracted six distinct keymeasurement tools, of which three had shorter more abbreviated derivatives; ofthese six distinct tools, only one was developed and validated in non-USpopulations. Also extracted were ten dimensions of trust: fidelity, technicalcompetence, communicative competence, interpersonal competence (i.e., caring), honesty,confidentiality, global, behavioral, fairness, and system trust/accountability.Interpersonal competence and fairness emerged as newer dimensions that deservefurther study. A comparative analysis of the indicators of these trustdimensions revealed some discrepancies that deserve further theoretical andpsychometric attention. In addition, the use of item-response theory to assessmeasurement invariance has been a productive addition to the assessment ofexternal validity. This review provides a resource for researchers that willlead to a more uniform understanding of trust thereby setting the basis forfuture theoretical integration and measurement development.

Authors

  • Weber, Linda R.
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR0.4 Dataset Index
10.3886/e1987432024

Replication Data for: “No experimental evidence for yawn contagion in galahs (Eolophus roseicapilla)” (Version: 1.1)

Data, analysis script and plot script related to the manuscript "No experimental evidence for yawn contagion in galahs (Eolophus roseicapilla)." Published in Animal Behavior & Cognition, https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.12.02.01.2025

Authors

  • Roth, Tom ;
  • Massen, Jorg ;
  • van Oosten, Jonas ;
  • Lisa-Claire Vanhooland ;
  • Gallup, Andrew
1 Citation0 Mentions13% FAIR0.5 Dataset Index
10.34894/3x2zpq2024

Measuring trust in one’s physician: A scoping review (Version: v1)

Trust in one’sphysician drives positive health practices. However, the conceptualization and subsequentoperationalization of trust have become clouded due to the multitude ofapproaches that have resulted in several different measures with varieddimensions and indicators. The objectives of this scoping review were: 1) toidentify those measures of trust, whether newly created or refined in the last10 years, whose reliability and validity had been studied, 2) to compare thoseinstruments’ conceptualizations, dimensions, andindicators, and 3) to discover any new developments in the measurement of trust.This researcher conducted an electronic search of three databases (PubMed,SOCAB, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers screened those selected studies andextracted six distinct keymeasurement tools, of which three had shorter more abbreviated derivatives; ofthese six distinct tools, only one was developed and validated in non-USpopulations. Also extracted were ten dimensions of trust: fidelity, technicalcompetence, communicative competence, interpersonal competence (i.e., caring), honesty,confidentiality, global, behavioral, fairness, and system trust/accountability.Interpersonal competence and fairness emerged as newer dimensions that deservefurther study. A comparative analysis of the indicators of these trustdimensions revealed some discrepancies that deserve further theoretical andpsychometric attention. In addition, the use of item-response theory to assessmeasurement invariance has been a productive addition to the assessment ofexternal validity. This review provides a resource for researchers that willlead to a more uniform understanding of trust thereby setting the basis forfuture theoretical integration and measurement development.

Authors

  • Weber, Linda R.
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR0.4 Dataset Index
10.3886/e198743v12024

Group Vigilance Hypothesis 2.0 (Version: 1.0)

This data set was used to generate the results for a manuscript submitted for publication

Authors

  • Gallup, Andrew
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/f3xngt2023

Interspecific Contagious Yawning in Humans 2.0 (Version: 1.0)

This is the dataset for a study examining the role of gender and empathic concern on interspecific contagious yawning in humans.

Authors

  • Gallup, Andrew
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/mpu6yf2023

Scorpion Detection (Version: 1.0)

This dataset was used to generate the results of a paper submitted for publication.

Authors

  • Gallup, Andrew
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/opkrjq2023

Group Vigilance 3.0 (Version: 1.0)

This dataset was used to generate the results for the paper submitted for publication that assesses how exposure to yawning modifies the visual search for spiders and cockroaches.

Authors

  • Gallup, Andrew
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/hxzbyh2023

Interspecific Contagious Yawning in Humans (Version: 1.0)

This is a dataset for a working manuscript.

Authors

  • Gallup, Andrew
1 Citation0 Mentions15% FAIR0.4 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/3stp5s2022

Interspecific Contagious Yawning (Version: 1.0)

This dataset was used to generate results for a working manuscript.

Authors

  • Gallup, Andrew
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/bd9r0p2022