Automated Organization Profile

André Márcio Amorim, & Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, Ondina, 40170 - 115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

Current S-Index

1.0

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.5

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

2

Total datasets in this organization

Average FAIR Score

47.1%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

0

Total citations to the organization's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the organization's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Table 1 in Phylogenomics of the tropical plant family Ochnaceae using targeted enrichment of nuclear genes and 250 + taxa

Table 1. Assembly and target enrichment statistics per sample of Ochnaceae and its major clades.Clade (number of individuals) aCleaned readsOn-target readsOn-target reads (sample-specific)Enrichment efficiency (%) bEnrichment efficiency, sample-specific (%)Loci recovered (sample specific)Loci recovered (consensus alignment)Mean read depth, FAM data (×) cMean read depth, LEO data (×) cOchnaceae (all) (n = 264)1,857, 078 (77,784 – 7,025,814)508,699 (839– 3,357,298)351,455 (1,495– 1,829,919)26. 3 (0.1– 78.2)19.7 (0.4 –46.3)226 (34– 273)188 (2 – 257)408 (23 – 2403)223 (7 – 1484)Ochneae (n = 199)1,901, 558 (136,360 – 7,025,814)668,893 (24,573 – 3,357,298)415,907 (1,495 – 1,829,919)34. 3 (3.1 – 78.2)22. 4 (0.4 –46.3)227 (34 – 273)225 (70 – 257)467 (26 – 2403)224 (7 – 1484)Sauvagesieae (n = 47)1,941, 757 (77,784 – 5,692,105)23,410 (839– 133,181)151,388 (5,177– 431,763)2. 0 (0.1– 20.6)9. 6 (0.5 –32.2)222 (53– 266)79 (2 – 165)223 (23 – 619)naLuxemburgieae & Testulea (n = 14)1,096, 178 (551,202 – 1,776,229)27,126 (11,899 – 53,015)190,333 (61,089 –569,881)2.7 (0.9 – 5.3)18.7 (4.2 –35.3)227 (110 – 268)85 (51 – 109)246 (108 – 580)naQuiinoideae & Medusagyne (n = 4)1,254, 609 (316,141 – 2,304,830)13,556 (4,640 –18,289)113,871 (56,531 – 169,167)1. 3 (0.8 – 1.6)11. 1 (7.3 – 17.9)204 (163 – 246)35 (17 – 57)186 (80 – 284)na

Authors

  • Schneider, Julio V. ;
  • Jungcurt, Tanja ;
  • Cardoso, Domingos ;
  • Amorim, André Márcio ;
  • Töpel, Mats ;
  • Andermann, Tobias ;
  • Poncy, Odile ;
  • Berberich, Thomas ;
  • Zizka, Georg
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.5281/zenodo.15151571February 2021

Table 1 in Phylogenomics of the tropical plant family Ochnaceae using targeted enrichment of nuclear genes and 250 + taxa

Table 1. Assembly and target enrichment statistics per sample of Ochnaceae and its major clades.Clade (number of individuals) aCleaned readsOn-target readsOn-target reads (sample-specific)Enrichment efficiency (%) bEnrichment efficiency, sample-specific (%)Loci recovered (sample specific)Loci recovered (consensus alignment)Mean read depth, FAM data (×) cMean read depth, LEO data (×) cOchnaceae (all) (n = 264)1,857, 078 (77,784 – 7,025,814)508,699 (839– 3,357,298)351,455 (1,495– 1,829,919)26. 3 (0.1– 78.2)19.7 (0.4 –46.3)226 (34– 273)188 (2 – 257)408 (23 – 2403)223 (7 – 1484)Ochneae (n = 199)1,901, 558 (136,360 – 7,025,814)668,893 (24,573 – 3,357,298)415,907 (1,495 – 1,829,919)34. 3 (3.1 – 78.2)22. 4 (0.4 –46.3)227 (34 – 273)225 (70 – 257)467 (26 – 2403)224 (7 – 1484)Sauvagesieae (n = 47)1,941, 757 (77,784 – 5,692,105)23,410 (839– 133,181)151,388 (5,177– 431,763)2. 0 (0.1– 20.6)9. 6 (0.5 –32.2)222 (53– 266)79 (2 – 165)223 (23 – 619)naLuxemburgieae & Testulea (n = 14)1,096, 178 (551,202 – 1,776,229)27,126 (11,899 – 53,015)190,333 (61,089 –569,881)2.7 (0.9 – 5.3)18.7 (4.2 –35.3)227 (110 – 268)85 (51 – 109)246 (108 – 580)naQuiinoideae & Medusagyne (n = 4)1,254, 609 (316,141 – 2,304,830)13,556 (4,640 –18,289)113,871 (56,531 – 169,167)1. 3 (0.8 – 1.6)11. 1 (7.3 – 17.9)204 (163 – 246)35 (17 – 57)186 (80 – 284)na

Authors

  • Schneider, Julio V. ;
  • Jungcurt, Tanja ;
  • Cardoso, Domingos ;
  • Amorim, André Márcio ;
  • Töpel, Mats ;
  • Andermann, Tobias ;
  • Poncy, Odile ;
  • Berberich, Thomas ;
  • Zizka, Georg
0 Citations0 Mentions81% FAIR0.9 Dataset Index
10.5281/zenodo.15151572February 2021