Automated Organization ProfileStanford Woods Institute for the Environment
Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets in this organization
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the organization's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the organization's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.4 (sum of 1 dataset Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Water acquisition programs support instream flows and other environmental water needs in many areas of the western United States. They have evolved over several decades, expanding from relatively simple two-party transactions involving modest water volumes to complex, multi-sector deals that move substantial volumes of water back to nature. Such programs now represent an important water management tool and impetus for collaboration among stakeholders, yet most evaluations of these programs' outcomes and effectiveness have focused exclusively on environmental metrics, without adequate attention to impacts on other water users or local economies. Given the importance of accomodating environmental water needs more fully in water resource plans, and the need to expend program resources carefully, a systematic, multi-objective evaluation framework is needed. This paper fills that need by articulating a suite of relevant environmental and socio-economic indicators for evaluating environmental transaction programs and portfolios. We have applied these indicators to environmental water transaction programs located in the western United States of Oregon, Montana and Nevada. The application to local programs illustrates both the challenges and the value of applying a systematic evaluation framework. More importantly, it quanitifies tradeoffs between sectors and helps identify opportunities for creative water transactions that benefit multiple sectors and the environment. The indicators are useful both in evaluating transactions already completed and in strategic planning and prioritizing for future transactions. A detailed guidebook to assist parties in applying this evaluation framework is available online.
Authors
- Kendy, Eloise ;
- Aylward, Bruce ;
- Ziemer, Laura ;
- Colby, Bonnie ;
- Richter, Brian ;
- Grantham, Ted ;
- Sanchez, Leslie ;
- Dicharry, Will ;
- Powell, Emily ;
- Martin, Season ;
- Kappel, Carrie ;
- Culp, Peter ;
- Szeptycki, Leon