Automated Organization ProfileINRA, UMR1349 IGEPP, 35653 Le Rheu France; CSIRO Agriculture & Food, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
INRA, UMR1349 IGEPP, 35653 Le Rheu France; CSIRO Agriculture & Food, PO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets in this organization
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the organization's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the organization's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 2.2 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Data setData are from an experiment simulating how differences in Brassica napus resistance deployment strategies and landscape connectivity influence epidemic severity and pathogen population composition of the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans on field plots inoculated with combinations of stubble in 2016 at CSIRO Canberra, ACT, Australia. Disease severity was assessed on the 60 field plots [Data_severity.csv] and 1490 isolates were sampled and assessed for infectivity [Data_infectivity.csv]. This dataset is described and analyzed in Bousset et al. (2018).Treatments were factorial combination of Resistance, Genetic Connectivity and Spatial Connectivity, replicated in 4 blocks (B1 to B4). Resistance has 3 categories (Rlm4, Rlm6 LepR1) differing by the resistance genes in oilseed rape varieties. Genetic Connectivity has 2 levels (HighGC, LowGC) differing by the pre-adaptation of the stubble populations to the host variety. Spatial Connectivity has two levels (HighSC, LowSC) differing by the stubble load. Control plots had NoStubble.Data files[Data_severity.csv] Disease severity was assessed on the 60 field plots at leaf spot and canker stages of the epidemic. Leaf spots data are counts. Canker data are numbers of stems in 12 categories defined by the cankered area on cross section (0 = no canker to 100 = fully cankered).[Data_infectivity.csv] Two types of isolates (122 from 3 stubble sources with contrasting preadaptation and 1368 from leaves sampled on 50 field plots) were tested for infectivity response (V = infective; A = non-infective) on the three host varieties (Rlm4, Rlm6 LepR1), at the seedling stage in greenhouse.Associated publicationBousset L, Sprague S, Thrall PH, Barrett LG (2018). Spatio-temporal connectivity and host resistance influence evolutionary and epidemiological dynamics of the canola pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans. Evolutionary Applications [ DOI: 10.1111/eva.12630 ].Funding informationThis work benefited from the financial support of INRA – the French National Institute for Agronomical Research, a CSIRO Sir Frederick McMaster fellowship to L. Bousset (Impact of inoculum carry-over on landscape dynamics of the blackleg canola pathogen) and the Grains Research & Development Corporation (GRDC Grant CSP00192)
Authors
- Lydia, Bousset ;
- Sprague Susan J ;
- Thrall Peter H ;
- G, Barrett Luke
Data setData are from an experiment simulating how differences in Brassica napus resistance deployment strategies and landscape connectivity influence epidemic severity and pathogen population composition of the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans on field plots inoculated with combinations of stubble in 2016 at CSIRO Canberra, ACT, Australia. Disease severity was assessed on the 60 field plots [Data_severity.csv] and 1490 isolates were sampled and assessed for infectivity [Data_infectivity.csv]. This dataset is described and analyzed in Bousset et al. (2018).Treatments were factorial combination of Resistance, Genetic Connectivity and Spatial Connectivity, replicated in 4 blocks (B1 to B4). Resistance has 3 categories (Rlm4, Rlm6 LepR1) differing by the resistance genes in oilseed rape varieties. Genetic Connectivity has 2 levels (HighGC, LowGC) differing by the pre-adaptation of the stubble populations to the host variety. Spatial Connectivity has two levels (HighSC, LowSC) differing by the stubble load. Control plots had NoStubble.Data files[Data_severity.csv] Disease severity was assessed on the 60 field plots at leaf spot and canker stages of the epidemic. Leaf spots data are counts. Canker data are numbers of stems in 12 categories defined by the cankered area on cross section (0 = no canker to 100 = fully cankered).[Data_infectivity.csv] Two types of isolates (122 from 3 stubble sources with contrasting preadaptation and 1368 from leaves sampled on 50 field plots) were tested for infectivity response (V = infective; A = non-infective) on the three host varieties (Rlm4, Rlm6 LepR1), at the seedling stage in greenhouse.Associated publicationBousset L, Sprague S, Thrall PH, Barrett LG (2018). Spatio-temporal connectivity and host resistance influence evolutionary and epidemiological dynamics of the canola pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans. Evolutionary Applications [ DOI: 10.1111/eva.12630 ].Funding informationThis work benefited from the financial support of INRA – the French National Institute for Agronomical Research, a CSIRO Sir Frederick McMaster fellowship to L. Bousset (Impact of inoculum carry-over on landscape dynamics of the blackleg canola pathogen) and the Grains Research & Development Corporation (GRDC Grant CSP00192)
Authors
- Lydia, Bousset ;
- Sprague Susan J ;
- Thrall Peter H ;
- G, Barrett Luke