Automated Author ProfileFrancis, Clinton
Francis, Clinton
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 8.6 (sum of 5 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
GENERAL INFORMATION1. Title: Data supporting: “Eye catching light: Anthropogenic light pollution and its evolutionary influence on the avian eye”2. Author InformationName: Margaret M. WolfInstitution: Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State UniversityAddress: 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, California, USA 93407Email: [email protected]: Clinton D. FrancisInstitution: Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State UniversityAddress: 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, California, USA 93407Email: [email protected]. FILE OVERVIEWTwo "ReadMe" files provide overviews of the code used in analyses in this report and to describe the variables in the data files. These are:1) README_WolfandFrancis_Code.rft2) README_WolfandFrancis_DATA.rftR Code files include:1) Wolf_LightEyeGeometries_Analyses.R - which provides code for all primary analyses presented in the report.2) Wolf_MorphoRepeatability_Analyses.R - which provides code for analyses related to the repeatability of morphological measurements presented in the report.Data files include:1) Wolf_LightEyeGeometries_Data.csv - which is associated with the Wolf_LightEyeGeometries_Analyses.R code.2) Wolf_MorphoRepeatability_Data.csv - which is associated with the Wolf_MorphoRepeatability_Analyses.R code.
Authors
- Wolf, Margaret ;
- Francis, Clinton
GENERAL INFORMATION1. Title: Data supporting: “Eye catching light: Anthropogenic light pollution and its evolutionary influence on the avian eye”2. Author InformationName: Margaret M. WolfInstitution: Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State UniversityAddress: 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, California, USA 93407Email: [email protected]: Clinton D. FrancisInstitution: Department of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State UniversityAddress: 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, California, USA 93407Email: [email protected]. FILE OVERVIEWTwo "ReadMe" files provide overviews of the code used in analyses in this report and to describe the variables in the data files. These are:1) README_WolfandFrancis_Code.rft2) README_WolfandFrancis_DATA.rftR Code files include:1) Wolf_LightEyeGeometries_Analyses.R - which provides code for all primary analyses presented in the report.2) Wolf_MorphoRepeatability_Analyses.R - which provides code for analyses related to the repeatability of morphological measurements presented in the report.Data files include:1) Wolf_LightEyeGeometries_Data.csv - which is associated with the Wolf_LightEyeGeometries_Analyses.R code.2) Wolf_MorphoRepeatability_Data.csv - which is associated with the Wolf_MorphoRepeatability_Analyses.R code.
Authors
- Wolf, Margaret ;
- Francis, Clinton
Reductions in animal body size over recent decades are often interpreted as an adaptive evolutionary response to climate warming. However, for reductions in size to reflect adaptive evolution, directional selection on body size within populations must have become negative, or, where already negative, more so, as temperatures increased. To test this hypothesis, we performed a meta-analysis of the association between annual estimates of directional selection on body size from wild populations and annual mean temperatures in 39 studies. We found no evidence that warmer environments were associated with selection for smaller size. Instead, selection consistently favoured larger individuals, and was invariant to temperature. These patterns were similar in ectotherms and endotherms. An analysis using year rather than temperature revealed similar patterns, suggesting no evidence that selection has changed over time, and also indicating that the lack of association with annual temperature was not an artefact of choosing an erroneous time window for aggregating the temperature data. Although phenotypic trends in size will be driven by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, our results suggest little evidence for a necessary ingredient - negative directional selection - for declines in body size to be considered an adaptive evolutionary response to changing selection pressures.
Authors
- Siepielski, Adam ;
- Morrissey, Michael ;
- Carlson, Stephanie ;
- Francis, Clinton ;
- Kingsolver, Joel ;
- Whitney, Kenneth ;
- Kruuk, Loeske
No description available
Authors
- Siepielski, Adam ;
- Morrissey, Michael ;
- Carlson, Stephanie ;
- Francis, Clinton ;
- Kingsolver, Joel ;
- Whitney, Kenneth ;
- Kruuk, Loeske