Automated Author ProfileDenninghoff, V.
Denninghoff, V.
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.6 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Objective: Latin American countries are heterogeneous in terms of lung cancer incidence and exposure to potential carcinogens. We evaluated the frequency and clinical characteristics of ALK rearrangements (ALKr) in Latin America. Methods: A total of 5,130 lung cancer patients from 10 Latin American countries were screened for inclusion. ALKr detection was performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to assess method variability. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed. Results: Among the 5,130 patients screened, 8.4% (n = 433) had nonevaluable FISH tests. Evaluable FISH analyses revealed positive ALKr in 6.8% (320/4,697) of the study population, which included patients from 9 countries. ALKr distribution for each country was: Mexico 7.6% (79/1,034), Colombia 4.1% (10/242), Argentina 6.0% (153/2,534), Costa Rica 9.5% (13/137), Panama 4.4% (5/114), Uruguay 5.4% (2/37), Chile 8.6% (16/185), Venezuela 8.9% (13/146), and Peru 10.8% (29/268). RT-PCR showed high positive (83.6%) and negative (99.7%) predictive values when compared to the gold standard FISH. In contrast, IHC only showed a high negative predictive value (94.6%). Conclusions: Although there is a clear country and continental variability in terms of ALKr frequency, this difference is not significant and the overall incidence of ALKr in Latin America does not differ from the rest of the world.
Authors
- Arrieta, O. ;
- Cardona, A.F. ;
- Bramuglia, G. ;
- Cruz-Rico, G. ;
- Corrales, L. ;
- Martín, C. ;
- Imaz-Olguín, V. ;
- Castillo, O. ;
- Cuello, M. ;
- Rojas-Bilbao É. ;
- Casas, G. ;
- Fernández, C. ;
- ArénFrontera, O. ;
- Denninghoff, V. ;
- Recondo, G. ;
- Avilés-Salas, A. ;
- Mas-Lopez, L.-A. ;
- Oblitas, G. ;
- Rojas, L. ;
- Piottante, A. ;
- Jiménez-García, E. ;
- Sánchez-Sosa, S. ;
- Sáenz-Frias, J. ;
- Lupera, H. ;
- Ramírez-Tirado, L.A. ;
- Vargas, C. ;
- Carranza, H. ;
- Astudillo, H. ;
- Wills, L.B. ;
- Pichelbaur, E. ;
- Raez, L.E. ;
- CLICaP, On Behalf Of The
Objective: Latin American countries are heterogeneous in terms of lung cancer incidence and exposure to potential carcinogens. We evaluated the frequency and clinical characteristics of ALK rearrangements (ALKr) in Latin America. Methods: A total of 5,130 lung cancer patients from 10 Latin American countries were screened for inclusion. ALKr detection was performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to assess method variability. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed. Results: Among the 5,130 patients screened, 8.4% (n = 433) had nonevaluable FISH tests. Evaluable FISH analyses revealed positive ALKr in 6.8% (320/4,697) of the study population, which included patients from 9 countries. ALKr distribution for each country was: Mexico 7.6% (79/1,034), Colombia 4.1% (10/242), Argentina 6.0% (153/2,534), Costa Rica 9.5% (13/137), Panama 4.4% (5/114), Uruguay 5.4% (2/37), Chile 8.6% (16/185), Venezuela 8.9% (13/146), and Peru 10.8% (29/268). RT-PCR showed high positive (83.6%) and negative (99.7%) predictive values when compared to the gold standard FISH. In contrast, IHC only showed a high negative predictive value (94.6%). Conclusions: Although there is a clear country and continental variability in terms of ALKr frequency, this difference is not significant and the overall incidence of ALKr in Latin America does not differ from the rest of the world.
Authors
- Arrieta, O. ;
- Cardona, A.F. ;
- Bramuglia, G. ;
- Cruz-Rico, G. ;
- Corrales, L. ;
- Martín, C. ;
- Imaz-Olguín, V. ;
- Castillo, O. ;
- Cuello, M. ;
- Rojas-Bilbao É. ;
- Casas, G. ;
- Fernández, C. ;
- ArénFrontera, O. ;
- Denninghoff, V. ;
- Recondo, G. ;
- Avilés-Salas, A. ;
- Mas-Lopez, L.-A. ;
- Oblitas, G. ;
- Rojas, L. ;
- Piottante, A. ;
- Jiménez-García, E. ;
- Sánchez-Sosa, S. ;
- Sáenz-Frias, J. ;
- Lupera, H. ;
- Ramírez-Tirado, L.A. ;
- Vargas, C. ;
- Carranza, H. ;
- Astudillo, H. ;
- Wills, L.B. ;
- Pichelbaur, E. ;
- Raez, L.E. ;
- CLICaP, On Behalf Of The