Automated Author Profile

Denninghoff, V.

Current S-Index

0.6

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.3

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

2

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

15.4%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

1

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Supplementary Material for: Molecular Epidemiology of <b><i>ALK</i></b> Rearrangements in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma in Latin America

Objective: Latin American countries are heterogeneous in terms of lung cancer incidence and exposure to potential carcinogens. We evaluated the frequency and clinical characteristics of ALK rearrangements (ALKr) in Latin America. Methods: A total of 5,130 lung cancer patients from 10 Latin American countries were screened for inclusion. ALKr detection was performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to assess method variability. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed. Results: Among the 5,130 patients screened, 8.4% (n = 433) had nonevaluable FISH tests. Evaluable FISH analyses revealed positive ALKr in 6.8% (320/4,697) of the study population, which included patients from 9 countries. ALKr distribution for each country was: Mexico 7.6% (79/1,034), Colombia 4.1% (10/242), Argentina 6.0% (153/2,534), Costa Rica 9.5% (13/137), Panama 4.4% (5/114), Uruguay 5.4% (2/37), Chile 8.6% (16/185), Venezuela 8.9% (13/146), and Peru 10.8% (29/268). RT-PCR showed high positive (83.6%) and negative (99.7%) predictive values when compared to the gold standard FISH. In contrast, IHC only showed a high negative predictive value (94.6%). Conclusions: Although there is a clear country and continental variability in terms of ALKr frequency, this difference is not significant and the overall incidence of ALKr in Latin America does not differ from the rest of the world.

Authors

  • Arrieta, O. ;
  • Cardona, A.F. ;
  • Bramuglia, G. ;
  • Cruz-Rico, G. ;
  • Corrales, L. ;
  • Martín, C. ;
  • Imaz-Olguín, V. ;
  • Castillo, O. ;
  • Cuello, M. ;
  • Rojas-Bilbao É. ;
  • Casas, G. ;
  • Fernández, C. ;
  • ArénFrontera, O. ;
  • Denninghoff, V. ;
  • Recondo, G. ;
  • Avilés-Salas, A. ;
  • Mas-Lopez, L.-A. ;
  • Oblitas, G. ;
  • Rojas, L. ;
  • Piottante, A. ;
  • Jiménez-García, E. ;
  • Sánchez-Sosa, S. ;
  • Sáenz-Frias, J. ;
  • Lupera, H. ;
  • Ramírez-Tirado, L.A. ;
  • Vargas, C. ;
  • Carranza, H. ;
  • Astudillo, H. ;
  • Wills, L.B. ;
  • Pichelbaur, E. ;
  • Raez, L.E. ;
  • CLICaP, On Behalf Of The
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.73807762018

Supplementary Material for: Molecular Epidemiology of <b><i>ALK</i></b> Rearrangements in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma in Latin America

Objective: Latin American countries are heterogeneous in terms of lung cancer incidence and exposure to potential carcinogens. We evaluated the frequency and clinical characteristics of ALK rearrangements (ALKr) in Latin America. Methods: A total of 5,130 lung cancer patients from 10 Latin American countries were screened for inclusion. ALKr detection was performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to assess method variability. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed. Results: Among the 5,130 patients screened, 8.4% (n = 433) had nonevaluable FISH tests. Evaluable FISH analyses revealed positive ALKr in 6.8% (320/4,697) of the study population, which included patients from 9 countries. ALKr distribution for each country was: Mexico 7.6% (79/1,034), Colombia 4.1% (10/242), Argentina 6.0% (153/2,534), Costa Rica 9.5% (13/137), Panama 4.4% (5/114), Uruguay 5.4% (2/37), Chile 8.6% (16/185), Venezuela 8.9% (13/146), and Peru 10.8% (29/268). RT-PCR showed high positive (83.6%) and negative (99.7%) predictive values when compared to the gold standard FISH. In contrast, IHC only showed a high negative predictive value (94.6%). Conclusions: Although there is a clear country and continental variability in terms of ALKr frequency, this difference is not significant and the overall incidence of ALKr in Latin America does not differ from the rest of the world.

Authors

  • Arrieta, O. ;
  • Cardona, A.F. ;
  • Bramuglia, G. ;
  • Cruz-Rico, G. ;
  • Corrales, L. ;
  • Martín, C. ;
  • Imaz-Olguín, V. ;
  • Castillo, O. ;
  • Cuello, M. ;
  • Rojas-Bilbao É. ;
  • Casas, G. ;
  • Fernández, C. ;
  • ArénFrontera, O. ;
  • Denninghoff, V. ;
  • Recondo, G. ;
  • Avilés-Salas, A. ;
  • Mas-Lopez, L.-A. ;
  • Oblitas, G. ;
  • Rojas, L. ;
  • Piottante, A. ;
  • Jiménez-García, E. ;
  • Sánchez-Sosa, S. ;
  • Sáenz-Frias, J. ;
  • Lupera, H. ;
  • Ramírez-Tirado, L.A. ;
  • Vargas, C. ;
  • Carranza, H. ;
  • Astudillo, H. ;
  • Wills, L.B. ;
  • Pichelbaur, E. ;
  • Raez, L.E. ;
  • CLICaP, On Behalf Of The
1 Citation0 Mentions15% FAIR0.5 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.7380776.v12018