Automated Author ProfileLuminita Marmureanu
Luminita Marmureanu
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.2 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
This work describes results obtained from the 2016 Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) intercomparison exercise performed at the Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center (ACMCC, France). Fifteen quadrupole ACSMs (Q_ACSM) from the European Research Infrastructure for the observation of Aerosols, Clouds and Trace gases (ACTRIS) network were calibrated using a new procedure that acquires calibration data under the same operating conditions as those used during sampling and hence gets information representative of instrument performance. The new calibration procedure notably resulted in a decrease in the spread of the measured sulfate mass concentrations, improving the reproducibility of inorganic species measurements between ACSMs as well as the consistency with co-located independent instruments. Tested calibration procedures also allowed for the investigation of artifacts in individual instruments, such as the overestimation of m/z 44 from organic aerosol. This effect was quantified by the m/z (mass-to-charge) 44 to nitrate ratio measured during ammonium nitrate calibrations, with values ranging from 0.03 to 0.26, showing that it can be significant for some instruments. The fragmentation table correction previously proposed to account for this artifact was applied to the measurements acquired during this study. For some instruments (those with high artifacts), this fragmentation table adjustment led to an “overcorrection” of the f44 (m/z 44/Org) signal. This correction based on measurements made with pure NH4NO3, assumes that the magnitude of the artifact is independent of chemical composition. Using data acquired at different NH4NO3 mixing ratios (from solutions of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4) we observe that the magnitude of the artifact varies as a function of composition. Here we applied an updated correction, dependent on the ambient NO3 mass fraction, which resulted in an improved agreement in organic signal among instruments. This work illustrates the benefits of integrating new calibration procedures and artifact corrections, but also highlights the benefits of these intercomparison exercises to continue to improve our knowledge of how these instruments operate, and assist us in interpreting atmospheric chemistry.
Authors
- Freney, Evelyn ;
- Yunjiang Zhang ;
- Croteau, Philip ;
- Amodeo, Tanguy ;
- Williams, Leah ;
- Truong, François ;
- Jean-Eudes Petit ;
- Sciare, Jean ;
- Sarda-Esteve, Roland ;
- Bonnaire, Nicolas ;
- Arumae, Tarvo ;
- Aurela, Minna ;
- Bougiatioti, Aikaterini ;
- Mihalopoulos, Nikolaos ;
- Coz, Esther ;
- Artinano, Begoña ;
- Crenn, Vincent ;
- Elste, Thomas ;
- Liine Heikkinen ;
- Poulain, Laurent ;
- Wiedensohler, Alfred ;
- Herrmann, Hartmut ;
- Priestman, Max ;
- Alastuey, Andres ;
- Stavroulas, Iasonas ;
- Tobler, Anna ;
- Vasilescu, Jeni ;
- Zanca, Nicola ;
- Canagaratna, Manjula ;
- Carbone, Claudio ;
- Flentje, Harald ;
- Green, David ;
- Maasikmets, Marek ;
- Luminita Marmureanu ;
- Minguillon, Maria Cruz ;
- Prevot, Andre S. H. ;
- Gros, Valerie ;
- Jayne, John ;
- Favez, Olivier
This work describes results obtained from the 2016 Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) intercomparison exercise performed at the Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center (ACMCC, France). Fifteen quadrupole ACSMs (Q_ACSM) from the European Research Infrastructure for the observation of Aerosols, Clouds and Trace gases (ACTRIS) network were calibrated using a new procedure that acquires calibration data under the same operating conditions as those used during sampling and hence gets information representative of instrument performance. The new calibration procedure notably resulted in a decrease in the spread of the measured sulfate mass concentrations, improving the reproducibility of inorganic species measurements between ACSMs as well as the consistency with co-located independent instruments. Tested calibration procedures also allowed for the investigation of artifacts in individual instruments, such as the overestimation of m/z 44 from organic aerosol. This effect was quantified by the m/z (mass-to-charge) 44 to nitrate ratio measured during ammonium nitrate calibrations, with values ranging from 0.03 to 0.26, showing that it can be significant for some instruments. The fragmentation table correction previously proposed to account for this artifact was applied to the measurements acquired during this study. For some instruments (those with high artifacts), this fragmentation table adjustment led to an “overcorrection” of the f44 (m/z 44/Org) signal. This correction based on measurements made with pure NH4NO3, assumes that the magnitude of the artifact is independent of chemical composition. Using data acquired at different NH4NO3 mixing ratios (from solutions of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4) we observe that the magnitude of the artifact varies as a function of composition. Here we applied an updated correction, dependent on the ambient NO3 mass fraction, which resulted in an improved agreement in organic signal among instruments. This work illustrates the benefits of integrating new calibration procedures and artifact corrections, but also highlights the benefits of these intercomparison exercises to continue to improve our knowledge of how these instruments operate, and assist us in interpreting atmospheric chemistry.
Authors
- Freney, Evelyn ;
- Yunjiang Zhang ;
- Croteau, Philip ;
- Amodeo, Tanguy ;
- Williams, Leah ;
- Truong, François ;
- Jean-Eudes Petit ;
- Sciare, Jean ;
- Sarda-Esteve, Roland ;
- Bonnaire, Nicolas ;
- Arumae, Tarvo ;
- Aurela, Minna ;
- Bougiatioti, Aikaterini ;
- Mihalopoulos, Nikolaos ;
- Coz, Esther ;
- Artinano, Begoña ;
- Crenn, Vincent ;
- Elste, Thomas ;
- Liine Heikkinen ;
- Poulain, Laurent ;
- Wiedensohler, Alfred ;
- Herrmann, Hartmut ;
- Priestman, Max ;
- Alastuey, Andres ;
- Stavroulas, Iasonas ;
- Tobler, Anna ;
- Vasilescu, Jeni ;
- Zanca, Nicola ;
- Canagaratna, Manjula ;
- Carbone, Claudio ;
- Flentje, Harald ;
- Green, David ;
- Maasikmets, Marek ;
- Luminita Marmureanu ;
- Minguillon, Maria Cruz ;
- Prevot, Andre S. H. ;
- Gros, Valerie ;
- Jayne, John ;
- Favez, Olivier