Purpose: Ulcerative colitis (UC) can be managed with immunomodulation or surgery. We aimed to understand whether these strategies had a different impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study: patients who had a moderate to severe UC episode that prompted the utilization of immunomodulatory drugs or surgery were invited to complete a generic (short form [36] health survey [SF-36]) and a disease-specific (inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire [IBDQ]) survey. Results: We included 157 patients, 65 (41.4%) surgically treated. The therapeutic procedure had a minimal impact on HRQoL: only the social dimension of the IBDQ and the physical function component of the SF-36 were significantly different between the study arms – lower for the surgically treated patients. The type of surgery had no impact, but the occurrence of pouchitis, namely, in a chronic form, was associated with a lower HRQoL. Regression analysis confirmed surgery as an independent predictor of lower scores in the social dimension of the IBDQ (–4.646, 95% CI –6.953 to –2.339) and in the physical functioning (–9.622, 95% CI –17.061 to –2.183) and physical role functioning (–3.669, 95% CI –7.339 to 0.001) dimensions of the SF36. Conclusions: Although usually feared by patients, surgery has a limited impact on UC patients HRQoL when compared to medical management with immunomodulatory drugs.

Purpose: Ulcerative colitis (UC) can be managed with immunomodulation or surgery. We aimed to understand whether these strategies had a different impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study: patients who had a moderate to severe UC episode that prompted the utilization of immunomodulatory drugs or surgery were invited to complete a generic (short form [36] health survey [SF-36]) and a disease-specific (inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire [IBDQ]) survey. Results: We included 157 patients, 65 (41.4%) surgically treated. The therapeutic procedure had a minimal impact on HRQoL: only the social dimension of the IBDQ and the physical function component of the SF-36 were significantly different between the study arms – lower for the surgically treated patients. The type of surgery had no impact, but the occurrence of pouchitis, namely, in a chronic form, was associated with a lower HRQoL. Regression analysis confirmed surgery as an independent predictor of lower scores in the social dimension of the IBDQ (–4.646, 95% CI –6.953 to –2.339) and in the physical functioning (–9.622, 95% CI –17.061 to –2.183) and physical role functioning (–3.669, 95% CI –7.339 to 0.001) dimensions of the SF36. Conclusions: Although usually feared by patients, surgery has a limited impact on UC patients HRQoL when compared to medical management with immunomodulatory drugs.

Introduction: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the gold standard for mid-gastrointestinal bleeding (MGIB). No score has been developed to predict the risk of small bowel rebleeding after SBCE. Objective: Creating a predictive small bowel rebleeding risk score for MGIB, after initial SBCE. Methods: Retrospective, single center study, including SBCEs for MGIB, from June 2006 to October 2016. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Univariate analysis and a multivariable Cox regression model tested the association with rebleeding. Statistically significant variables were used to compute the score. The score’s accuracy was tested through a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A classification tree identified risk groups. For internal validation, we performed a 5-fold cross validation. Results: We assessed 357 SBCEs for MGIB, of which 88 (24.6%) presented rebleeding during follow-up. Seven variables were used to compute a risk-predicting score – the RHEMITT score – namely, renal disease; heart failure; endoscopic capsule P1/P2 lesions; major bleeding; incomplete capsule; tobacco consumption; and endoscopic treatment. The score presented good accuracy toward the outcome (area under the curve ROC 0.842, 95% CI 0.757–0.927). We established 3 rebleeding risk groups: low (0–3 points); intermediate (4–10 points); and high (+11 points). Conclusion: A new MGIB score, named RHEMITT, accurately anticipates the individual risk of small bowel rebleeding after initial SBCE.

Introduction: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the gold standard for mid-gastrointestinal bleeding (MGIB). No score has been developed to predict the risk of small bowel rebleeding after SBCE. Objective: Creating a predictive small bowel rebleeding risk score for MGIB, after initial SBCE. Methods: Retrospective, single center study, including SBCEs for MGIB, from June 2006 to October 2016. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Univariate analysis and a multivariable Cox regression model tested the association with rebleeding. Statistically significant variables were used to compute the score. The score’s accuracy was tested through a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A classification tree identified risk groups. For internal validation, we performed a 5-fold cross validation. Results: We assessed 357 SBCEs for MGIB, of which 88 (24.6%) presented rebleeding during follow-up. Seven variables were used to compute a risk-predicting score – the RHEMITT score – namely, renal disease; heart failure; endoscopic capsule P1/P2 lesions; major bleeding; incomplete capsule; tobacco consumption; and endoscopic treatment. The score presented good accuracy toward the outcome (area under the curve ROC 0.842, 95% CI 0.757–0.927). We established 3 rebleeding risk groups: low (0–3 points); intermediate (4–10 points); and high (+11 points). Conclusion: A new MGIB score, named RHEMITT, accurately anticipates the individual risk of small bowel rebleeding after initial SBCE.