Automated Author ProfileKlasberg, S.
Klasberg, S.
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.3 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
The advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) has altered the face of genotyping the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system in clinical, stem cell donor registry, and research contexts. NGS has led to a dramatically increased sequencing throughput at high accuracy, while being more time and cost efficient than precursor technologies. This has led to a broader and deeper profiling of the key genes in the human immunogenetic make-up. The rapid evolution of sequencing technologies is evidenced by the development of varied short-read sequencing platforms with differing read lengths and sequencing capacities to long-read sequencing platforms capable of profiling full genes without fragmentation. Concomitantly, there has been development of a diverse set of computational analyses and software tools developed to deal with the various strengths and limitations of the sequencing data generated by the different sequencing platforms. This review surveys the different modalities involved in generating NGS HLA profiling sequence data. It systematically describes various computational approaches that have been developed to achieve HLA genotyping to different degrees of resolution. At each stage, this review enumerates the drawbacks and advantages of each of the platforms and analysis approaches, thus providing a comprehensive picture of the current state of HLA genotyping technologies.
Authors
- Klasberg, S. ;
- Surendranath, V. ;
- Lange, V. ;
- Schöfl, G.
The advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) has altered the face of genotyping the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system in clinical, stem cell donor registry, and research contexts. NGS has led to a dramatically increased sequencing throughput at high accuracy, while being more time and cost efficient than precursor technologies. This has led to a broader and deeper profiling of the key genes in the human immunogenetic make-up. The rapid evolution of sequencing technologies is evidenced by the development of varied short-read sequencing platforms with differing read lengths and sequencing capacities to long-read sequencing platforms capable of profiling full genes without fragmentation. Concomitantly, there has been development of a diverse set of computational analyses and software tools developed to deal with the various strengths and limitations of the sequencing data generated by the different sequencing platforms. This review surveys the different modalities involved in generating NGS HLA profiling sequence data. It systematically describes various computational approaches that have been developed to achieve HLA genotyping to different degrees of resolution. At each stage, this review enumerates the drawbacks and advantages of each of the platforms and analysis approaches, thus providing a comprehensive picture of the current state of HLA genotyping technologies.
Authors
- Klasberg, S. ;
- Surendranath, V. ;
- Lange, V. ;
- Schöfl, G.