Automated Author Profile

Song, Liping

Current S-Index

32.4

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.6

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

56

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

16.3%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

37

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

CCDC 2225975: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.

Authors

  • Yi, Hai ;
  • Zuo, Chunshan ;
  • Song, Liping ;
  • Albrecht, Markus ;
  • Zhao, Xiaoli
1 Citation0 Mentions15% FAIR0.7 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2dq9n3January 2024

CCDC 2190262: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.

Authors

  • Yi, Hai ;
  • Zuo, Chunshan ;
  • Song, Liping ;
  • Albrecht, Markus ;
  • Zhao, Xiaoli
1 Citation0 Mentions13% FAIR0.7 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2cj4mpJanuary 2024

CCDC 2152316: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.

Authors

  • Song, Liping ;
  • Liu, Ying ;
  • Zhang, Yiping ;
  • Zhou, Yingkai ;
  • Zhang, Min ;
  • Deng, Hongmei
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b7nktJanuary 2022

CCDC 2069853: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

No description available

Authors

  • Song, Liping
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27gvg1January 2021

CCDC 2073274: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

No description available

Authors

  • Song, Liping
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27ldt2January 2021

CCDC 2069854: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

No description available

Authors

  • Song, Liping
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27gvh2January 2021

Quantitative species determination based on real time PCR–Can the results be expressed as weight/weight equivalents?

Food adulteration is a common challenge in the meat industry. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used as a method to detect contamination from different species of meat. From a consumer perspective, a PCR method with measurements in terms of weight/weight (w/w) ratios will be more familiar. In this study, the focus was on how to convert the results of quantitative analysis from genome/genome (g/g) to w/w using real-time PCR. The mixtures with different ratios of mutton in pork were analyzed as test samples. The c values of different species, as a reflection of the key conversion factors, were established and evaluated. The effects of heat treatment on w/w conversion of PCR data were also assessed. The results indicated that the c value shows significant variability among individual samples. An average c value was found to cause a bias of more than 7% for mixtures in the range of 20–80%. For individual meat samples with pre-determined c-values, real-time PCR was useful for quantitative analysis of mutton contamination in pork within the range of 20–80%, with a bias of detection of less than 2%. However, this method was shown to have a limit of quantification of 5% with mutton in pork. Furthermore, heat treatment (121°C, 15 min) significantly reduced the accuracy of quantitative analyses. Because the c value is not available for most commercial samples, and some food products are subjected to heat treatment as a method of sterilization, accurate quantitative analysis (w/w) may not be an option for commercial samples using PCR-based technology.

Authors

  • Song, Liping ;
  • Hu, Zhikai ;
  • Wang, Qinglong ;
  • Jiang, Jie ;
  • Cao, Yue ;
  • Wang, Dan ;
  • Rui, Sun ;
  • Li, Long ;
  • Cai, Xuefeng ;
  • Wu, Yantao ;
  • Suo, Yiping
1 Citation0 Mentions85% FAIR1.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.12155379January 2020

CCDC 1986457: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

No description available

Authors

  • Duan, Wenwen ;
  • Li, Zeyu ;
  • Chen, Fanhui ;
  • Zhang, Min ;
  • Deng, Hongmei ;
  • Song, Liping
1 Citation0 Mentions13% FAIR0.7 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc24p286January 2020

CCDC 1986452: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

No description available

Authors

  • Duan, Wenwen ;
  • Li, Zeyu ;
  • Chen, Fanhui ;
  • Zhang, Min ;
  • Deng, Hongmei ;
  • Song, Liping
1 Citation0 Mentions13% FAIR0.7 Dataset Index
10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc24p231January 2020

Quantitative species determination based on real time PCR–Can the results be expressed as weight/weight equivalents?

Food adulteration is a common challenge in the meat industry. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used as a method to detect contamination from different species of meat. From a consumer perspective, a PCR method with measurements in terms of weight/weight (w/w) ratios will be more familiar. In this study, the focus was on how to convert the results of quantitative analysis from genome/genome (g/g) to w/w using real-time PCR. The mixtures with different ratios of mutton in pork were analyzed as test samples. The c values of different species, as a reflection of the key conversion factors, were established and evaluated. The effects of heat treatment on w/w conversion of PCR data were also assessed. The results indicated that the c value shows significant variability among individual samples. An average c value was found to cause a bias of more than 7% for mixtures in the range of 20–80%. For individual meat samples with pre-determined c-values, real-time PCR was useful for quantitative analysis of mutton contamination in pork within the range of 20–80%, with a bias of detection of less than 2%. However, this method was shown to have a limit of quantification of 5% with mutton in pork. Furthermore, heat treatment (121°C, 15 min) significantly reduced the accuracy of quantitative analyses. Because the c value is not available for most commercial samples, and some food products are subjected to heat treatment as a method of sterilization, accurate quantitative analysis (w/w) may not be an option for commercial samples using PCR-based technology.

Authors

  • Song, Liping ;
  • Hu, Zhikai ;
  • Wang, Qinglong ;
  • Jiang, Jie ;
  • Cao, Yue ;
  • Wang, Dan ;
  • Rui, Sun ;
  • Li, Long ;
  • Cai, Xuefeng ;
  • Wu, Yantao ;
  • Suo, Yiping
1 Citation0 Mentions85% FAIR2.2 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.12155379.v1January 2020