Automated Author ProfileWang, Shaokui
South China Agricultural University
Wang, Shaokui
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 8.2 (sum of 12 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Supplementary Material 2: Table S1 QTLs for PGC and their position in the substitution segments in SSSLs. Table S2 Substitution segments carrying QTLs for PGC in pyramiding lines. Table S3 The phenotypes of rice chalkiness in 1QLs to 4QLs. Table S4 Additive effects of QTL combinations on PGC in 1QLs to 4QLs. Table S5 Epistatic effects of QTL combinations on PGC in pyramiding lines. Table S6 Average temperatures of 30 days after rice flowering in different cropping seasons
Authors
- Yang, Weifeng ;
- Chen, Songliang ;
- Hao, Qingwen ;
- Zhu, Haitao ;
- Tan, Quanya ;
- Lin, Shaojun ;
- Chen, Guodong ;
- Li, Zhan ;
- Bu, Suhong ;
- Liu, Zupei ;
- Liu, Guifu ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Zhang, Guiquan
Supplementary Material 2: Table S1 QTLs for PGC and their position in the substitution segments in SSSLs. Table S2 Substitution segments carrying QTLs for PGC in pyramiding lines. Table S3 The phenotypes of rice chalkiness in 1QLs to 4QLs. Table S4 Additive effects of QTL combinations on PGC in 1QLs to 4QLs. Table S5 Epistatic effects of QTL combinations on PGC in pyramiding lines. Table S6 Average temperatures of 30 days after rice flowering in different cropping seasons
Authors
- Yang, Weifeng ;
- Chen, Songliang ;
- Hao, Qingwen ;
- Zhu, Haitao ;
- Tan, Quanya ;
- Lin, Shaojun ;
- Chen, Guodong ;
- Li, Zhan ;
- Bu, Suhong ;
- Liu, Zupei ;
- Liu, Guifu ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Zhang, Guiquan
Additional file 12: Table S2–1. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_CK22vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–2. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_CK20vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–3. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_CK22vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–4. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_CK20vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–5. The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PR403_CK22vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–6 The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PR403_CK20vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–7. The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PY6_CK22vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–8. The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PY6_CK20vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–9. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_22vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–10. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_20vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–11. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_22vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–12. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_20vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05).
Authors
- Yu, Baiyang ;
- Liu, Jianbin ;
- Wu, Di ;
- Liu, Ying ;
- Cen, Weijian ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Li, Rongbai ;
- Luo, Jijing
Additional file 12: Table S2–1. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_CK22vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–2. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_CK20vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–3. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_CK22vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–4. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_CK20vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–5. The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PR403_CK22vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–6 The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PR403_CK20vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–7. The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PY6_CK22vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–8. The development dependent DEGs identified in the comparison of PY6_CK20vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–9. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_22vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–10. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PR403_20vsPR403_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–11. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_22vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05). Table S2–12. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in the comparison of PY6_20vsPY6_CK40 (log2FC ≥ 1 and padj ≤ 0.05).
Authors
- Yu, Baiyang ;
- Liu, Jianbin ;
- Wu, Di ;
- Liu, Ying ;
- Cen, Weijian ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Li, Rongbai ;
- Luo, Jijing
Additional file 13: Table S3–1. Hub genes list of module black. Table S3–2. Hub genes list of module blue. Table S3–3. Hub genes list of module grey60. Table S3–4. Hub genes list of module green. Table S3–5. Hub genes list of module red. Table S3–6. Hub genes list of module brown. Table S3–7. Hub genes list of module royalblue.
Authors
- Yu, Baiyang ;
- Liu, Jianbin ;
- Wu, Di ;
- Liu, Ying ;
- Cen, Weijian ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Li, Rongbai ;
- Luo, Jijing
Additional file 14: Table S4. Differentially expressed hub genes identified in module brown.
Authors
- Yu, Baiyang ;
- Liu, Jianbin ;
- Wu, Di ;
- Liu, Ying ;
- Cen, Weijian ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Li, Rongbai ;
- Luo, Jijing
Additional file 1: Table S1. Stigma exsertion rate of the 9 SSSLs in 5 cropping seasons. Table S2. Analysis of variance based on a fixed-effect model of the 9 SSSLs in 5 cropping seasons. Table S3. Developed markers used to detect the substituted segments of the SSSLs. Table S4. Substituted segments detected by markers in the SSSLs. Table S5. Phenotypes of agronomic traits in the SSSLs.
Authors
- Tan, Quanya ;
- Zou, Tuo ;
- Zheng, Mingmin ;
- Ni, Yuerong ;
- Luan, Xin ;
- Li, Xiaohui ;
- Yang, Weifeng ;
- Yang, Zifeng ;
- Zhu, Haitao ;
- Zeng, Ruizhen ;
- Liu, Guifu ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Fu, Xuelin ;
- Zhang, Guiquan
Additional file 15: Table S5–1. GO enrichment result of module black. Table S5–2. GO enrichment result of module blue. Table S5–3. GO enrichment result of module grey60. Table S5–4. GO enrichment result of module green. Table S5–5. GO enrichment result of module red. Table S5–6. GO enrichment result of module brown. Table S5–7. GO enrichment result of module royalblue. Table S5–8 GO enrichment result of PR403 22 vs PR403 CK40. Table S5–9. GO enrichment result of PR403 20 vs PR403 CK40. Table S5–10. GO enrichment result of PY6 22 vs PY6 CK40. Table S5–11. GO enrichment result of PY6 20 vs PY6 CK40.
Authors
- Yu, Baiyang ;
- Liu, Jianbin ;
- Wu, Di ;
- Liu, Ying ;
- Cen, Weijian ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Li, Rongbai ;
- Luo, Jijing
Additional file 15: Table S5–1. GO enrichment result of module black. Table S5–2. GO enrichment result of module blue. Table S5–3. GO enrichment result of module grey60. Table S5–4. GO enrichment result of module green. Table S5–5. GO enrichment result of module red. Table S5–6. GO enrichment result of module brown. Table S5–7. GO enrichment result of module royalblue. Table S5–8 GO enrichment result of PR403 22 vs PR403 CK40. Table S5–9. GO enrichment result of PR403 20 vs PR403 CK40. Table S5–10. GO enrichment result of PY6 22 vs PY6 CK40. Table S5–11. GO enrichment result of PY6 20 vs PY6 CK40.
Authors
- Yu, Baiyang ;
- Liu, Jianbin ;
- Wu, Di ;
- Liu, Ying ;
- Cen, Weijian ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Li, Rongbai ;
- Luo, Jijing
Additional file 13: Table S3–1. Hub genes list of module black. Table S3–2. Hub genes list of module blue. Table S3–3. Hub genes list of module grey60. Table S3–4. Hub genes list of module green. Table S3–5. Hub genes list of module red. Table S3–6. Hub genes list of module brown. Table S3–7. Hub genes list of module royalblue.
Authors
- Yu, Baiyang ;
- Liu, Jianbin ;
- Wu, Di ;
- Liu, Ying ;
- Cen, Weijian ;
- Wang, Shaokui ;
- Li, Rongbai ;
- Luo, Jijing