Automated Author ProfileBaguma, S D
National agricultural research organization, Bulindi Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute
Baguma, S D
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 7.2 (sum of 10 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
:unav
Authors
- Otieno, G ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kairagura, G ;
- Abigaba, H ;
- Gidane, Y G ;
- Fadda, C ;
- Wambi, W ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W
33 different accessions/varieties of beans were randomly distributed to 200 farmers using the Alliance of Bioversity International and ICAT Climmob Version 2 software( http://climmob.net/Version_2/menu.html ). Three blind varieties were given to each farmer coded A, B and C and were planted in three 2m by 3m plots. A total of 8 villages with 25 farmers from each were engaged. This data set comprised of a total of 112 farmers who managed to successfully evaluate the three blind varieties they were given and successfully shared their data.
Authors
- Otieno, G ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kairagura, G ;
- Abigaba, H ;
- Gidane, Y G ;
- Fadda, C ;
- Wambi, W ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W
:unav
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C
56 bean accessions were planted in a randomised block design, with three replications. All blocks received the same treatment. The block sizes were 2m by 2m. The phenotypic data was collected using the descriptors from the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources.
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C
:unav
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C
104 Millet accessions were planted in a randomised block design, with three replications. All blocks received the same treatment. The block sizes were 2m by 2m. The phenotypic data was collected using the descriptors from the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources.
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C
:unav
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C
A total of 15 varieties of beans were evaluated by 15 farmers at National Agricultural Research Centre in Hoima. A Likert scale of 1 to 5 was used by farmers to rank the performance of each variety based on a number of agreed variables. 1=Very poor, 2=Poor, 3=Fair, 4=Good and 5=Very Good in terms of performance.
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C
:unav
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C
A total of 15 varieties of beans were evaluated by 15 farmers at National Agricultural Research Centre in Hoima. A Likert scale of 1 to 5 was used by farmers to rank the performance of each variety based on a number of agreed variables. 1=Very poor, 2=Poor, 3=Fair, 4=Good and 5=Very Good in terms of performance.
Authors
- Wambi, W ;
- Recha, T ;
- Kakeeto, R ;
- Ahumuza, J ;
- Baguma, S D ;
- Adokorach, J ;
- Mulumba, J W ;
- Otieno, G ;
- Fadda, C