Automated Author ProfileSatten, Glen A.
Emory UniversityNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Satten, Glen A.
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 2.7 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Modern statistical analyses often involve testing large numbers of hypotheses. In many situations, these hypotheses may have an underlying tree structure that both helps determine the order that tests should be conducted but also imposes a dependency between tests that must be accounted for. Our motivating example comes from testing the association between a trait of interest and groups of microbes that have been organized into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) or amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Given p-values from association tests for each individual OTU or ASV, we would like to know if we can declare a certain species, genus, or higher taxonomic group to be associated with the trait. For this problem, a bottom-up testing algorithm that starts at the lowest level of the tree (OTUs or ASVs) and proceeds upward through successively higher taxonomic groupings (species, genus, family, etc.) is required. We develop such a bottom-up testing algorithm that controls a novel error rate that we call the false selection rate. By simulation, we also show that our approach is better at finding driver taxa, the highest level taxa below which there are dense association signals. We illustrate our approach using data from a study of the microbiome among patients with ulcerative colitis and healthy controls. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Authors
- Li, Yunxiao ;
- Hu, Yi-Juan ;
- Satten, Glen A.
Modern statistical analyses often involve testing large numbers of hypotheses. In many situations, these hypotheses may have an underlying tree structure that both helps determine the order that tests should be conducted but also imposes a dependency between tests that must be accounted for. Our motivating example comes from testing the association between a trait of interest and groups of microbes that have been organized into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) or amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Given p-values from association tests for each individual OTU or ASV, we would like to know if we can declare a certain species, genus, or higher taxonomic group to be associated with the trait. For this problem, a bottom-up testing algorithm that starts at the lowest level of the tree (OTUs or ASVs) and proceeds upward through successively higher taxonomic groupings (species, genus, family, etc.) is required. We develop such a bottom-up testing algorithm that controls a novel error rate that we call the false selection rate. By simulation, we also show that our approach is better at finding driver taxa, the highest level taxa below which there are dense association signals. We illustrate our approach using data from a study of the microbiome among patients with ulcerative colitis and healthy controls. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Authors
- Li, Yunxiao ;
- Hu, Yi-Juan ;
- Satten, Glen A.