Automated Author ProfileSegura, Isis
Segura, Isis
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 4.6 (sum of 3 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
A double-blind, parallel-group design study 30 undergraduates randomly allocated to acute oral treatments with 15 mg diazepam or placebo. Working Memory Capacity (running memory span and counting span) tasks and story recall were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Story presentation was succeeded by 10 min of Retroactive Interference (RI - spotting differences in pictures) or minimal RI (doing nothing in darkened rooms). Delayed story recall was assessed under diazepam and 7 days later in a drug-free session to assess accelerated forgetting. Results: Recall of stories encoded or reencoded (reconsolidated) under diazepam was severely impaired (anterograde amnesia). However, diazepam did not: impair WMC, increase susceptibility to RI nor accelerate forgetting assessed 7 days later.
Authors
- Segura, Isis
A double-blind, parallel-group design study 30 undergraduates randomly allocated to acute oral treatments with 15 mg diazepam or placebo. Working Memory Capacity (running memory span and counting span) tasks and story recall were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Story presentation was succeeded by 10 min of Retroactive Interference (RI - spotting differences in pictures) or minimal RI (doing nothing in darkened rooms). Delayed story recall was assessed under diazepam and 7 days later in a drug-free session to assess accelerated forgetting. Results: Recall of stories encoded or reencoded (reconsolidated) under diazepam was severely impaired (anterograde amnesia). However, diazepam did not: impair WMC, increase susceptibility to RI nor accelerate forgetting assessed 7 days later.
Authors
- Segura, Isis
A double-blind, parallel-group design study 30 undergraduates randomly allocated to acute oral treatments with 15 mg diazepam or placebo. Working Memory Capacity (running memory span and counting span) tasks and story recall were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Story presentation was succeeded by 10 min of Retroactive Interference (RI - spotting differences in pictures) or minimal RI (doing nothing in darkened rooms). Delayed story recall was assessed under diazepam and 7 days later in a drug-free session to assess accelerated forgetting. Results: Recall of stories encoded or reencoded (reconsolidated) under diazepam was severely impaired (anterograde amnesia). However, diazepam did not: impair WMC, increase susceptibility to RI nor accelerate forgetting assessed 7 days later.
Authors
- Segura, Isis