Automated Author ProfileDixon, LaTanya
Vanderbilt University, Peabody College of Education
Dixon, LaTanya
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 8.6 (sum of 5 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
In Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. (2017), four Black mothers claim their elementary-aged children are educated in schools with predominantly Black enrollments that have conditions incomparable to schools in neighboring school districts with predominantly White enrollments and higher socioeconomic statuses. The lawsuit claims this racial inequality in education is a violation of the post-Civil War Readmission Act (1868) requirement to provide a “uniform system of free public schools” (Williams et al. v. Bryant et al., 2017, p. 3) and to not modify state laws to disadvantage a group of citizens.
As the case moves through the courts one generation after Black parents in Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education (1969) fought for school desegregation to produce racial equality in education, this archival study investigates to what extent Mississippi administered racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students from its statehood in 1817 through desegregation. This period of history was selected with implications for explaining systemic racial disparities as school resegregated shortly after Alexander v. Holmes enforced desegregation, school desegregation “failed to narrow educational gaps or alter the educational status of most Blacks” (Baker, 2001, p. 321), and parental education can influence a student’s education outcomes.
Authors
- Dixon, LaTanya
In Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. (2017), four Black mothers claim their elementary-aged children are educated in schools with predominantly Black enrollments that have conditions incomparable to schools in neighboring school districts with predominantly White enrollments and higher socioeconomic statuses. The lawsuit claims this racial inequality in education is a violation of the post-Civil War Readmission Act (1868) requirement to provide a “uniform system of free public schools” (Williams et al. v. Bryant et al., 2017, p. 3) and to not modify state laws to disadvantage a group of citizens.
As the case moves through the courts one generation after Black parents in Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education (1969) fought for school desegregation to produce racial equality in education, this archival study investigates to what extent Mississippi administered racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students from its statehood in 1817 through desegregation. This period of history was selected with implications for explaining systemic racial disparities as school resegregated shortly after Alexander v. Holmes enforced desegregation, school desegregation “failed to narrow educational gaps or alter the educational status of most Blacks” (Baker, 2001, p. 321), and parental education can influence a student’s education outcomes.
The data show Mississippi amended its laws and reformed its educational practices to (a) deny Black slaves access to education; (b) delay the consolidation of Black schools; (c) require Black Mississippians to pay a large percentage of the cost for the construction of their schools; (d) distribute school funding unequally; (e) permit elementary school attrition; (f) repeal its compulsory attendance law. These barriers were enacted to resist school desegregation and to prevent high school education in an overall effort to maintain a pre-Civil War racial hierarchy.
Authors
- Dixon, LaTanya
On the 50th year anniversary of Alexander v. Holmes Board of Education (1969) nationally enforcing school desegregation in fall 1970, Mississippi is being sued for racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students in Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. (2017). Using quantitative and qualitative primary sources, I investigate the extent to which Mississippi administered racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students since its statehood in 1817 through school desegregation. To the extent that research suggests school desegregation “failed to narrow educational gaps or alter the educational status of most Blacks” (Baker, 2001, p. 321) and parental education can influence a student’s education outcomes, Black parents in Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. fighting for racial equality in education for their children in segregated schools one generation after Black parents in Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education (1969) fought for school desegregation to produce racial equality in education suggests the history of racial disparities in the public education of Mississippi is contemporarily salient.
The data in the study show Mississippi amended its laws and reformed its educational practices to (a) deny Black slaves access to education; (b) delay the consolidation of Black schools; (c) require Black Mississippians to pay a large percentage of the cost for the construction of their schools; (d) distribute school funding unequally; (e) permit elementary school attrition; (f) repeal its compulsory attendance law. These barriers were enacted to resist school desegregation and to prevent high school education in an overall effort to maintain a pre-Civil War racial hierarchy.
Authors
- Dixon, LaTanya
On the 50th year anniversary of Alexander v. Holmes Board of Education (1969) nationally enforcing school desegregation in fall 1970, Mississippi is being sued for racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students in Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. (2017). Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. claims the current racial inequality in education is a violation of the post-Civil War Readmission Act (1868) requirement to provide a “uniform system of free public schools” (Williams et al. v. Bryant et al., 2017, p. 3) and to not modify state laws to disadvantage a group of citizens. Using quantitative and qualitative primary sources, I investigate the extent to which Mississippi administered racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students since its statehood in 1817 through school desegregation. To the extent that research suggests school desegregation “failed to narrow educational gaps or alter the educational status of most Blacks” (Baker, 2001, p. 321) and parental education can influence a student’s education outcomes, Black parents in Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. fighting for racial equality in education for their children in segregated schools one generation after Black parents in Alexander v. Holmes fought for school desegregation to produce racial equality in education suggests the history of racial disparities in the public education of Mississippi is contemporarily salient.
The data in the study show Mississippi amended its laws and reformed its educational practices to (a) deny Black slaves access to education; (b) delay the consolidation of Black schools; (c) require Black Mississippians to pay a large percentage of the cost for the construction of their schools; (d) distribute school funding unequally; (e) permit elementary school attrition; (f) repeal its compulsory attendance law. These barriers were enacted to resist school desegregation and to prevent high school education in an overall effort to maintain a pre-Civil War racial hierarchy.
Authors
- Dixon, LaTanya
On the 50th year anniversary of Alexander v. Holmes Board of Education (1969) nationally enforcing school desegregation in fall 1970, Mississippi is being sued for racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students in Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. (2017). Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. claims the current racial inequality in education is a violation of the post-Civil War Readmission Act (1868) requirement to provide a “uniform system of free public schools” (Williams et al. v. Bryant et al., 2017, p. 3) and to not modify state laws to disadvantage a group of citizens. Using quantitative and qualitative primary sources, I investigate the extent to which Mississippi administered racial disparities in public education between Black students and White students from its statehood in 1817 through school desegregation. To the extent that research suggests school desegregation “failed to narrow educational gaps or alter the educational status of most Blacks” (Baker, 2001, p. 321) and parental education can influence a student’s education outcomes, Black parents in Williams et al. v. Bryant et al. fighting for racial equality in education for their children in segregated schools two generations after Black parents in Alexander v. Holmes fought for school desegregation to produce racial equality in education suggests the history of racial disparities in the public education of Mississippi is contemporarily salient.
The data in the study show Mississippi amended its laws and reformed its educational practices to (a) deny Black slaves access to education; (b) delay the consolidation of Black schools; (c) require Black Mississippians to pay the highest percentage of the cost for the construction of their schools; (d) distribute school funding unequally; (e) permit elementary school attrition; (f) repeal its compulsory attendance law. These barriers were enacted to resist school desegregation and to prevent high school education in an overall effort to maintain a pre-Civil War racial hierarchy.
Authors
- Dixon, LaTanya