Automated Author ProfileHanselaer, Peter
Hanselaer, Peter
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.2 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
A good color description starts with the availability of accurate color-matching functions (CMFs) or cone fundamentals (CF). Recent work indicates a discrepancy between visual metamers and those calculated using the standard CIE CMFs or other CMF sets, especially for narrowband sources. In the current study, 54 observers (varying in age, gender, ethnicity, and eye color) performed a series of achromatic color-matching experiments with a 10° stimulus using eight different narrowband primaries under an immersive, perceptually neutral (4673 K) viewing conditions. The reference stimulus was provided by a 70 cd/m2 gray (4613 K) card illuminated by a spectrally broadband light source. The results confirm that substantial and significant differences between experimental and calculated metamers exist, particularly when a short wavelength primary (404 nm) is included and especially for the CIE 1931 2° CMFs. It is found that the primary set characterized by the peak wavelengths 636 nm, 521 nm, and 447 nm, which are close to those of typical RGB primaries widely used in industry, results in the most stable matching performance across all CMF sets. Finally, in addition to the impact of primary wavelength and CMF set, the potential effect of age, gender, ethnicity, and eye color has also been investigated. The effect of age on the color matches is found to be significant and is due to differences in spectral sensitivity of young and old observers with respect to the blue primary; the impact of observer gender, ethnicity, and eye color, on color-matching accuracy is not significant.
Authors
- Li, Jiaye ;
- Hanselaer, Peter ;
- Smet, Kevin A. G.
A good color description starts with the availability of accurate color-matching functions (CMFs) or cone fundamentals (CF). Recent work indicates a discrepancy between visual metamers and those calculated using the standard CIE CMFs or other CMF sets, especially for narrowband sources. In the current study, 54 observers (varying in age, gender, ethnicity, and eye color) performed a series of achromatic color-matching experiments with a 10° stimulus using eight different narrowband primaries under an immersive, perceptually neutral (4673 K) viewing conditions. The reference stimulus was provided by a 70 cd/m2 gray (4613 K) card illuminated by a spectrally broadband light source. The results confirm that substantial and significant differences between experimental and calculated metamers exist, particularly when a short wavelength primary (404 nm) is included and especially for the CIE 1931 2° CMFs. It is found that the primary set characterized by the peak wavelengths 636 nm, 521 nm, and 447 nm, which are close to those of typical RGB primaries widely used in industry, results in the most stable matching performance across all CMF sets. Finally, in addition to the impact of primary wavelength and CMF set, the potential effect of age, gender, ethnicity, and eye color has also been investigated. The effect of age on the color matches is found to be significant and is due to differences in spectral sensitivity of young and old observers with respect to the blue primary; the impact of observer gender, ethnicity, and eye color, on color-matching accuracy is not significant.
Authors
- Li, Jiaye ;
- Hanselaer, Peter ;
- Smet, Kevin A. G.