Automated Author ProfileMarinescu, Ioana
University of Penssylvania
Marinescu, Ioana
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.9 (sum of 5 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Since 1982, all Alaskan residents have received a yearly cash dividend from the Alaska Permanent Fund. Using the Current Population Survey and a synthetic control method, this paper shows that the dividend had no effect on employment, and increased part-time work by 1.8percentage points (17%). A calibration of micro and macro effects suggests that the empirical results are consistent with cash stimulating the local economy — a general equilibrium effect.Non-tradable sectors have a more positive employment response than tradable sectors. Overall, the results suggest that a universal and permanent cash transfer does not significantly decrease aggregate employment.
Authors
- Jones, Damon ;
- Marinescu, Ioana
Since 1982, all Alaskan residents have received a yearly cash dividend from the Alaska Permanent Fund. Using the Current Population Survey and a synthetic control method, this paper shows that the dividend had no effect on employment, and increased part-time work by 1.8percentage points (17%). A calibration of micro and macro effects suggests that the empirical results are consistent with cash stimulating the local economy — a general equilibrium effect.Non-tradable sectors have a more positive employment response than tradable sectors. Overall, the results suggest that a universal and permanent cash transfer does not significantly decrease aggregate employment.
Authors
- Jones, Damon ;
- Marinescu, Ioana
Since 1982, all Alaskan residents have received a yearly cash dividend from the Alaska Permanent Fund. Using the Current Population Survey and a synthetic control method, this paper shows that the dividend had no effect on employment, and increased part-time work by 1.8percentage points (17%). A calibration of micro and macro effects suggests that the empirical results are consistent with cash stimulating the local economy — a general equilibrium effect.Non-tradable sectors have a more positive employment response than tradable sectors. Overall, the results suggest that a universal and permanent cash transfer does not significantly decrease aggregate employment.
Authors
- Jones, Damon ;
- Marinescu, Ioana
Since 1982, all Alaskan residents have received a yearly cash dividend from the Alaska Permanent Fund. Using the Current Population Survey and a synthetic control method, this paper shows that the dividend had no effect on employment, and increased part-time work by 1.8percentage points (17%). A calibration of micro and macro effects suggests that the empirical results are consistent with cash stimulating the local economy — a general equilibrium effect.Non-tradable sectors have a more positive employment response than tradable sectors. Overall, the results suggest that a universal and permanent cash transfer does not significantly decrease aggregate employment.
Authors
- Jones, Damon ;
- Marinescu, Ioana
Since 1982, all Alaskan residents have received a yearly cash dividend from the Alaska Permanent Fund. Using the Current Population Survey and a synthetic control method, this paper shows that the dividend had no effect on employment, and increased part-time work by 1.8percentage points (17%). A calibration of micro and macro effects suggests that the empirical results are consistent with cash stimulating the local economy — a general equilibrium effect.Non-tradable sectors have a more positive employment response than tradable sectors. Overall, the results suggest that a universal and permanent cash transfer does not significantly decrease aggregate employment.
Authors
- Jones, Damon ;
- Marinescu, Ioana