Automated Author ProfileL., Meira
L., Meira
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.6 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Background: Pneumothorax is one of the main complications of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC). Chest ultrasound (CUS) is a radiation-free alternative method for pneumothorax detection. Objective: We tested CUS diagnostic accuracy for pneumothorax and assessed its role in the decision algorithm for pneumothorax management. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the post-procedure pneumothorax occurrence and risk factors. Methods: Eligible patients underwent TBLC, followed by chest X-ray (CXR) evaluation 2 h after the procedure, as our standard protocol. Bedside CUS was performed within 30 min and 2 h after TBLC. Pneumothorax by CUS was defined by the absence of lung sliding and comet-tail artefacts and confirmed with the stratosphere sign on M-mode. Pneumothorax size was determined through lung point projection on CUS and interpleural distance on CXR and properly managed according to clinical status. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included. Nineteen pneumothoraces were detected at 2 h after the procedure, of which 8 (42.1%) were already present at the first CUS evaluation. All CXR-detected pneumothoraces had a positive CUS detection. There were 3 discordant cases (κ = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76–1.00, p < 0.001), which were detected by CUS but not by inspiration CXR. We calculated a specificity of 97.5% (95% CI: 86.8–99.9) and a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 87.2–100) for CUS. Pneumothorax rate was higher when biopsies were taken in 2 lobes and if histology had pleural representation. Final diagnosis was achieved in 79.1% of patients, with the most frequent diagnosis being hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Regarding patients with large-volume pneumothorax needing drainage, the rate of detection was similar between CUS and CRX. Conclusion: CUS can replace CXR in detecting the presence of pneumothorax after TBLC, and the lung point site can reliably indicate its size. This useful method optimizes time spent at the bronchology unit and allows immediate response in symptomatic patients, helping to choose optimal treatment strategies, while preventing ionizing radiation exposure.
Authors
- D.B., Coelho ;
- R., Boaventura ;
- L., Meira ;
- S., Guimarães ;
- C.S., Moura ;
- P., Mota ;
- N., Melo ;
- A., Carvalho ;
- J.M., Pereira ;
- A., Magalhães ;
- A., Morais ;
- H., NovaisBastos
Background: Pneumothorax is one of the main complications of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC). Chest ultrasound (CUS) is a radiation-free alternative method for pneumothorax detection. Objective: We tested CUS diagnostic accuracy for pneumothorax and assessed its role in the decision algorithm for pneumothorax management. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the post-procedure pneumothorax occurrence and risk factors. Methods: Eligible patients underwent TBLC, followed by chest X-ray (CXR) evaluation 2 h after the procedure, as our standard protocol. Bedside CUS was performed within 30 min and 2 h after TBLC. Pneumothorax by CUS was defined by the absence of lung sliding and comet-tail artefacts and confirmed with the stratosphere sign on M-mode. Pneumothorax size was determined through lung point projection on CUS and interpleural distance on CXR and properly managed according to clinical status. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included. Nineteen pneumothoraces were detected at 2 h after the procedure, of which 8 (42.1%) were already present at the first CUS evaluation. All CXR-detected pneumothoraces had a positive CUS detection. There were 3 discordant cases (κ = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76–1.00, p < 0.001), which were detected by CUS but not by inspiration CXR. We calculated a specificity of 97.5% (95% CI: 86.8–99.9) and a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 87.2–100) for CUS. Pneumothorax rate was higher when biopsies were taken in 2 lobes and if histology had pleural representation. Final diagnosis was achieved in 79.1% of patients, with the most frequent diagnosis being hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Regarding patients with large-volume pneumothorax needing drainage, the rate of detection was similar between CUS and CRX. Conclusion: CUS can replace CXR in detecting the presence of pneumothorax after TBLC, and the lung point site can reliably indicate its size. This useful method optimizes time spent at the bronchology unit and allows immediate response in symptomatic patients, helping to choose optimal treatment strategies, while preventing ionizing radiation exposure.
Authors
- D.B., Coelho ;
- R., Boaventura ;
- L., Meira ;
- S., Guimarães ;
- C.S., Moura ;
- P., Mota ;
- N., Melo ;
- A., Carvalho ;
- J.M., Pereira ;
- A., Magalhães ;
- A., Morais ;
- H., NovaisBastos