Site is currently under maintenance
Some features may be unavailable or limited during this time. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience.

Automated Author Profile

McClelland, S.C.

Colorado State University

Current S-Index

0.3

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.3

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

1

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

15.4%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

1

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions by Ruminants

To meet the 1.5°C target, methane (CH4) from ruminants must be reduced by 11 to 30% of the 2010 level by 2030 and by 24 to 47% by 2050. A meta-analysis identified strategies to decrease product-based [PB; CH4 per unit meat or milk (CH4I)] and absolute (ABS) enteric CH4 emissions while maintaining or increasing animal productivity (AP; weight gain and milk yield). Next the potential of different adoption rates of one PB and/or ABS strategies to contribute to the 1.5°C target was estimated. The database included findings from 425 peer-reviewed studies, which reported 98 mitigation strategies that can be classified into three categories: animal and feed management, diet formulation, and rumen manipulation. A random-effects meta-analysis weighted by inverse variance was carried out. Three PB strategies, namely increasing feeding level, decreasing grass maturity, and decreasing dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio, decreased CH4I by on average 12% and increased AP by a median of 17%. Five ABS strategies, namely CH4 inhibitors, tanniferous forages, electron sinks, oils and fats, and oilseeds, decreased daily methane by on average 21%. Globally, only 100% adoption of the most effective PB and ABS strategies can meet the 1.5°C target by 2030 but not 2050, because mitigation effects are offset by projected increases in CH4 due to increasing demand. Notably, by 2030 and 2050 low- and middle-income countries may not meet their contribution to the 1.5°C target for this same reason, whereas high income countries could meet their contributions due to only a minor projected increase in enteric CH4 emissions.

Authors

  • Arndt, C. ;
  • Hristov, A.N. ;
  • Price, W.J. ;
  • McClelland, S.C. ;
  • Pelaez, A.M. ;
  • Bayat, A.R. ;
  • Crompton, L.A. ;
  • Dijkstra, J. ;
  • Eugène, M.A. ;
  • Enahoro, D. ;
  • Kebreab, E. ;
  • Kreuzer, M. ;
  • McGee, M. ;
  • Martin, C. ;
  • Newbold, C.J. ;
  • Reynolds, C.K. ;
  • Schwarm, A. ;
  • Shingfield, K.J. ;
  • Veneman, J.B. ;
  • Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R. ;
  • Yu, Z.
1 Citation0 Mentions15% FAIR0.7 Dataset Index
10.26208/6em7-k817January 2022