Automated Author Profile

Romero, Laia

Lobelia
0000-0001-6476-0875

Current S-Index

3.8

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

1.9

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

2

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

76.9%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

0

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Virtual stations (TeroVIR ) and water level time series (TeroWAT) in West Africa and Arctic regions (Version: 1.0.1)

The dataset contains a sample of locations across Siberia and Africa, for which water-level time series were automatically derived from Sentinel-3 altimeters (methodology described in Machefer et al. 20221) from year 2016 to year 2021, together with the in-situ station records and the area covered by the altimetry measurements. The purpose of this dataset is validation and exemplification of the methodology. The methodology described produces comprehensive water level records at a global scale based on altimetry satellite data. The validation against in-situ data was assessed in numerous environments in West Africa and complex locations such as Arctic rivers partially covered with ice.

This dataset offers a sample of the records at 3 locations in West Africa (Kemacina [Mali], Koulikouro [Mali], Lokoja [Niger]) and in the sub-arctic region (Yakutsk [Russia]). The data are organised by Level 1 of HydroBASINS2 definition (ex: africa) in two folders, each containing: virtual stations (teroVIR) and insitu stations (insitu) as shapefiles with their associated metadata, the corresponding water level time series (teroWAT) in NetCDF, and the level 3 of HydroBASINS, corresponding to the largest river basins of each continent. Finally, a csv file (validation) presents the computed metrics assessing the accuracy of the processors. N.B.: time series with less than two common date points between insitu and teroWAT have not been assessed. [1] Machefer, M., Perpinyà-Vallès M., Escorihuela M.J., Gustafsson D., Romero L. (2022): Challenges and evolution of water level monitoring towards a comprehensive, world-scale coverage with remote sensing. Earth System Science Data (Under Reviewing) [2] Lehner, B., Grill G. (2013): Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrological Processes, 27(15): 2171–2186. Data is available at www.hydrosheds.org.

Authors

  • Machefer, Mélissande ;
  • Perpinyà-Vallès, Martí ;
  • Escorihuela, Maria Jose ;
  • Gustafsson, David ;
  • Romero, Laia
0 Citations0 Mentions77% FAIR1.9 Dataset Index
10.5281/zenodo.62847042022

Virtual stations (TeroVIR ) and water level time series (TeroWAT) in West Africa and Arctic regions (Version: 1.0.1)

The dataset contains a sample of locations across Siberia and Africa, for which water-level time series were automatically derived from Sentinel-3 altimeters (methodology described in Machefer et al. 20221) from year 2016 to year 2021, together with the in-situ station records and the area covered by the altimetry measurements. The purpose of this dataset is validation and exemplification of the methodology. The methodology described produces comprehensive water level records at a global scale based on altimetry satellite data. The validation against in-situ data was assessed in numerous environments in West Africa and complex locations such as Arctic rivers partially covered with ice.

This dataset offers a sample of the records at 3 locations in West Africa (Kemacina [Mali], Koulikouro [Mali], Lokoja [Niger]) and in the sub-arctic region (Yakutsk [Russia]). The data are organised by Level 1 of HydroBASINS2 definition (ex: africa) in two folders, each containing: virtual stations (teroVIR) and insitu stations (insitu) as shapefiles with their associated metadata, the corresponding water level time series (teroWAT) in NetCDF, and the level 3 of HydroBASINS, corresponding to the largest river basins of each continent. Finally, a csv file (validation) presents the computed metrics assessing the accuracy of the processors. N.B.: time series with less than two common date points between insitu and teroWAT have not been assessed. [1] Machefer, M., Perpinyà-Vallès M., Escorihuela M.J., Gustafsson D., Romero L. (2022): Challenges and evolution of water level monitoring towards a comprehensive, world-scale coverage with remote sensing. Earth System Science Data (Under Reviewing) [2] Lehner, B., Grill G. (2013): Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrological Processes, 27(15): 2171–2186. Data is available at www.hydrosheds.org.

Authors

  • Machefer, Mélissande ;
  • Perpinyà-Vallès, Martí ;
  • Escorihuela, Maria Jose ;
  • Gustafsson, David ;
  • Romero, Laia
0 Citations0 Mentions77% FAIR1.9 Dataset Index
10.5281/zenodo.62847032022