Automated Author ProfileBryer, Cheri
Bryer, Cheri
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.6 (sum of 4 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
These are peer-reviewed supplementary materials for the article 'Promoting community stakeholder engagement in research on treatment for pregnant women with opioid use disorder' published in the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.Provider Stakeholder Survey: In Preparation for Proposal SubmissionAim: Community stakeholder engagement in research (CSER) can improve research relevance and efficiency as well as prevent harmful practices, particularly for vulnerable populations. Despite potential benefits, researchers lack familiarity with CSER methods. Methods: We describe CSER strategies used across the research continuum, including proposal development, study planning and the first years of a comparative effectiveness study of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Results: We highlight successful strategies, grounded in principles of engagement, to establish and maintain stakeholder relationships, foster bidirectional communication and trust and support active participation of women with opioid use disorder in the research process. Conclusion: CSER methods support research with a disenfranchised population. Future work will evaluate the impact of CSER strategies on study outcomes and dissemination.
Authors
- Johnson, Deborah ;
- Brunette, Mary ;
- Goodman, Daisy ;
- Adams, Meagan ;
- Bryer, Cheri ;
- Doherty, Julie ;
- Flanagan, Victoria ;
- Frew, Julia R ;
- Mullins, Sarah ;
- Sheehan, Farrah ;
- Tobar-Santamaria, Allison ;
- Whitney, Sarah ;
- Lord, Sarah
These are peer-reviewed supplementary materials for the article 'Promoting community stakeholder engagement in research on treatment for pregnant women with opioid use disorder' published in the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.Provider Stakeholder Survey: In Preparation for Proposal SubmissionAim: Community stakeholder engagement in research (CSER) can improve research relevance and efficiency as well as prevent harmful practices, particularly for vulnerable populations. Despite potential benefits, researchers lack familiarity with CSER methods. Methods: We describe CSER strategies used across the research continuum, including proposal development, study planning and the first years of a comparative effectiveness study of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Results: We highlight successful strategies, grounded in principles of engagement, to establish and maintain stakeholder relationships, foster bidirectional communication and trust and support active participation of women with opioid use disorder in the research process. Conclusion: CSER methods support research with a disenfranchised population. Future work will evaluate the impact of CSER strategies on study outcomes and dissemination.
Authors
- Johnson, Deborah ;
- Brunette, Mary ;
- Goodman, Daisy ;
- Adams, Meagan ;
- Bryer, Cheri ;
- Doherty, Julie ;
- Flanagan, Victoria ;
- Frew, Julia R ;
- Mullins, Sarah ;
- Sheehan, Farrah ;
- Tobar-Santamaria, Allison ;
- Whitney, Sarah ;
- Lord, Sarah
Provider Stakeholder Survey: In Preparation for Proposal Submission
Authors
- Johnson, Deborah J ;
- Brunette, Mary F. ;
- Goodman, Daisy J. ;
- Adams, Meagan ;
- Bryer, Cheri ;
- Doherty, Julie R ;
- Flanagan, Victoria ;
- Frew, Julia R ;
- Mullins, Sarah ;
- Sheehan, Farrah ;
- Tobar-Santamaria, Allison ;
- Whitney, Sarah ;
- Lord, Sarah
Provider Stakeholder Survey: In Preparation for Proposal Submission
Authors
- Johnson, Deborah J ;
- Brunette, Mary F. ;
- Goodman, Daisy J. ;
- Adams, Meagan ;
- Bryer, Cheri ;
- Doherty, Julie R ;
- Flanagan, Victoria ;
- Frew, Julia R ;
- Mullins, Sarah ;
- Sheehan, Farrah ;
- Tobar-Santamaria, Allison ;
- Whitney, Sarah ;
- Lord, Sarah