Automated Author ProfileK., Tatsumi
K., Tatsumi
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.8 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Background: A previous clinical trial for autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (APAP) demonstrated that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) inhalation reduced the mean density of the lung field on computed tomography (CT) across 18 axial slice planes at a two-dimensional level. In contrast, in this study, we challenged three-dimensional analysis for changes in CT density distribution using the same datasets. Methods: As a sub-study of the trial, CT data of 31 and 27 patients who received GM-CSF and placebo, respectively, were analyzed. To overcome the difference between various shooting conditions, a newly developed automatic lung field segmentation algorithm was applied to CT data to extract the whole lung volume, and the accuracy of the segmentation was evaluated by five pulmonary physicians independently. For normalization, the percent pixel (PP) in a certain density range was calculated as a percentage of the total number of pixels from −1,000 to 0 HU. Results: The automatically segmented images revealed that the lung field was accurately extracted except for 7 patients with minor deletion or addition. Using the change in PP from baseline to week 25 (ΔPP) as the vertical axis, we created a histogram with 143 HU bins set for each patient. The most significant difference in ΔPP between GM-CSF and placebo groups was observed in two ranges: from −1,000 to −857 and −143 to 0 HU. Conclusion: Whole lung extraction followed by density histogram analysis of ΔPP may be an appropriate evaluation method for assessing CT improvement in APAP.
Authors
- M., Oda ;
- K., Yamaura ;
- H., Ishii ;
- N., Kitamura ;
- R., Tazawa ;
- M., Abe ;
- K., Tatsumi ;
- R., Eda ;
- S., Kondoh ;
- K., Morimoto ;
- T., Tanaka ;
- E., Yamaguchi ;
- A., Takahashi ;
- S., Izumi ;
- H., Sugiyama ;
- A., Nakagawa ;
- K., Tomii ;
- M., Suzuki ;
- S., Konno ;
- S., Ohkouchi ;
- N., Tode ;
- T., Handa ;
- T., Hirai ;
- Y., Inoue ;
- T., Arai ;
- K., Asakawa ;
- T., Takada ;
- H., Nonaka ;
- K., Nakata
Background: A previous clinical trial for autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (APAP) demonstrated that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) inhalation reduced the mean density of the lung field on computed tomography (CT) across 18 axial slice planes at a two-dimensional level. In contrast, in this study, we challenged three-dimensional analysis for changes in CT density distribution using the same datasets. Methods: As a sub-study of the trial, CT data of 31 and 27 patients who received GM-CSF and placebo, respectively, were analyzed. To overcome the difference between various shooting conditions, a newly developed automatic lung field segmentation algorithm was applied to CT data to extract the whole lung volume, and the accuracy of the segmentation was evaluated by five pulmonary physicians independently. For normalization, the percent pixel (PP) in a certain density range was calculated as a percentage of the total number of pixels from −1,000 to 0 HU. Results: The automatically segmented images revealed that the lung field was accurately extracted except for 7 patients with minor deletion or addition. Using the change in PP from baseline to week 25 (ΔPP) as the vertical axis, we created a histogram with 143 HU bins set for each patient. The most significant difference in ΔPP between GM-CSF and placebo groups was observed in two ranges: from −1,000 to −857 and −143 to 0 HU. Conclusion: Whole lung extraction followed by density histogram analysis of ΔPP may be an appropriate evaluation method for assessing CT improvement in APAP.
Authors
- M., Oda ;
- K., Yamaura ;
- H., Ishii ;
- N., Kitamura ;
- R., Tazawa ;
- M., Abe ;
- K., Tatsumi ;
- R., Eda ;
- S., Kondoh ;
- K., Morimoto ;
- T., Tanaka ;
- E., Yamaguchi ;
- A., Takahashi ;
- S., Izumi ;
- H., Sugiyama ;
- A., Nakagawa ;
- K., Tomii ;
- M., Suzuki ;
- S., Konno ;
- S., Ohkouchi ;
- N., Tode ;
- T., Handa ;
- T., Hirai ;
- Y., Inoue ;
- T., Arai ;
- K., Asakawa ;
- T., Takada ;
- H., Nonaka ;
- K., Nakata