Automated Author Profile

H.E., Veenstra-Knol

Current S-Index

1.3

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.7

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

2

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

84.6%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

1

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Supplementary Material for: Diagnostic gene panel testing in (non)-syndromic patients with cleft lip, alveolus and/or palate in the Netherlands.

ABSTRACT Objectives Clefts of the lip, alveolus and/or palate (CLA/P) are the most common craniofacial congenital malformations in humans. These oral clefts can be divided into non-syndromic (isolated) and syndromic forms. Many cleft-related syndromes are clinically variable and genetically heterogeneous, making it challenging to distinguish syndromic from non-syndromic cases. Recognition of syndromic/genetic causes is important for personalized tailored care, identification of (unrecognized) co-morbidities and accurate genetic counseling. Therefore, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) based targeted gene panel testing is increasingly implemented in diagnostics of CLA/P patients. In this retrospective study we assess the yield of NGS gene panel testing in a cohort of CLA/P cases. Methods Whole exome sequencing followed by variant detection and interpretation in an a-priori selected set of genes associated with CLA/P phenotypes was performed in 212 unrelated CLA/P patients after genetic counseling between 2015 and 2020. Medical records including family history and results of additional genetic tests were evaluated. Results In 24 CLA/P cases (11.3 %) a pathogenic genetic variant was identified. Twenty out of these 24 had a genetic syndrome requiring specific monitoring and follow-up. Six of these 24 cases (25%) were presumed to be isolated CLA/P cases prior to testing, corresponding to 2,8% of the total cohort. In eight CLA/P cases (3.8%) without a diagnosis after NGS based gene panel testing, a molecular diagnosis was established by additional genetic analyses (e.g., SNP array, single gene testing, trio WES). Conclusion This study illustrates NGS based gene panel testing as a powerful diagnostic tool in the diagnostic work-up of CLA/P patients. Also, in apparently isolated cases and non- familial cases a genetic diagnose could be identified. Early diagnosis facilitates personalized care for patients and accurate genetic counseling of their families.

Authors

  • L.F., Wurfbain ;
  • I.L., Cox ;
  • M.F., vanDooren ;
  • A.M.A., Lachmeijer ;
  • V.J.M., Verhoeven ;
  • J.M., vanHagen ;
  • M., Heijligers ;
  • J.S., KleinWassink-Ruiter ;
  • S., Koene ;
  • S.M., Maas ;
  • H.E., Veenstra-Knol ;
  • J.K., PloosvanAmstel ;
  • M.P.G., Massink ;
  • A.B., MinkvanderMolen ;
  • M.-J.H., vandenBoogaard
1 Citation0 Mentions85% FAIR0.8 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.226825092023

Supplementary Material for: Diagnostic gene panel testing in (non)-syndromic patients with cleft lip, alveolus and/or palate in the Netherlands.

ABSTRACT Objectives Clefts of the lip, alveolus and/or palate (CLA/P) are the most common craniofacial congenital malformations in humans. These oral clefts can be divided into non-syndromic (isolated) and syndromic forms. Many cleft-related syndromes are clinically variable and genetically heterogeneous, making it challenging to distinguish syndromic from non-syndromic cases. Recognition of syndromic/genetic causes is important for personalized tailored care, identification of (unrecognized) co-morbidities and accurate genetic counseling. Therefore, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) based targeted gene panel testing is increasingly implemented in diagnostics of CLA/P patients. In this retrospective study we assess the yield of NGS gene panel testing in a cohort of CLA/P cases. Methods Whole exome sequencing followed by variant detection and interpretation in an a-priori selected set of genes associated with CLA/P phenotypes was performed in 212 unrelated CLA/P patients after genetic counseling between 2015 and 2020. Medical records including family history and results of additional genetic tests were evaluated. Results In 24 CLA/P cases (11.3 %) a pathogenic genetic variant was identified. Twenty out of these 24 had a genetic syndrome requiring specific monitoring and follow-up. Six of these 24 cases (25%) were presumed to be isolated CLA/P cases prior to testing, corresponding to 2,8% of the total cohort. In eight CLA/P cases (3.8%) without a diagnosis after NGS based gene panel testing, a molecular diagnosis was established by additional genetic analyses (e.g., SNP array, single gene testing, trio WES). Conclusion This study illustrates NGS based gene panel testing as a powerful diagnostic tool in the diagnostic work-up of CLA/P patients. Also, in apparently isolated cases and non- familial cases a genetic diagnose could be identified. Early diagnosis facilitates personalized care for patients and accurate genetic counseling of their families.

Authors

  • L.F., Wurfbain ;
  • I.L., Cox ;
  • M.F., vanDooren ;
  • A.M.A., Lachmeijer ;
  • V.J.M., Verhoeven ;
  • J.M., vanHagen ;
  • M., Heijligers ;
  • J.S., KleinWassink-Ruiter ;
  • S., Koene ;
  • S.M., Maas ;
  • H.E., Veenstra-Knol ;
  • J.K., PloosvanAmstel ;
  • M.P.G., Massink ;
  • A.B., MinkvanderMolen ;
  • M.-J.H., vandenBoogaard
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR0.5 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.22682509.v12023