Automated Author ProfileA., Lokangaka
A., Lokangaka
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.7 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Background Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low-and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns. Methods This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 grams and born from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation (MV). Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression. Results 177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n=5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n=3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites. Conclusions Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.
Authors
- N., Switchenko ;
- V., Shukla ;
- M., Mwenechanya ;
- E., Chomba ;
- A., Patel ;
- P.L., Hibberd ;
- N., Ambalavanan ;
- L., Figueroa ;
- M., Mazariegos ;
- N.F., Krebs ;
- S.S., Goudar ;
- R., Derman ;
- F., Esamai ;
- E.A., Liechty ;
- S., Bucher ;
- S., Saleem ;
- R.L., Goldenberg ;
- A., Lokangaka ;
- A., Tshefu ;
- C.L., Bose ;
- M., Koso-Thomas ;
- S., Tan ;
- T., Nolen ;
- E.M., McClure ;
- W.A., Carlo
Background Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low-and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns. Methods This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 grams and born from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation (MV). Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression. Results 177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n=5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n=3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites. Conclusions Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.
Authors
- N., Switchenko ;
- V., Shukla ;
- M., Mwenechanya ;
- E., Chomba ;
- A., Patel ;
- P.L., Hibberd ;
- N., Ambalavanan ;
- L., Figueroa ;
- M., Mazariegos ;
- N.F., Krebs ;
- S.S., Goudar ;
- R., Derman ;
- F., Esamai ;
- E.A., Liechty ;
- S., Bucher ;
- S., Saleem ;
- R.L., Goldenberg ;
- A., Lokangaka ;
- A., Tshefu ;
- C.L., Bose ;
- M., Koso-Thomas ;
- S., Tan ;
- T., Nolen ;
- E.M., McClure ;
- W.A., Carlo