Automated Author ProfileFitzJohn, Richard Gareth
FitzJohn, Richard Gareth
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 6.3 (sum of 4 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
<b>Abstract</b><br/>The loss of sexual recombination and segregation in asexual organisms has been portrayed as an irreversible process that commits asexually-reproducing lineages to reduced diversification. We test this hypothesis by estimating rates of speciation, extinction, and transition between sexuality and functional asexuality in the evening primroses. Specifically, we estimate these rates using the recently developed BiSSE (Binary State Speciation and Extinction) phylogenetic comparative method, which employs maximum likelihood and Bayesian techniques. We infer that net diversification rates (speciation minus extinction) in functionally asexual evening primrose lineages are roughly eight times faster than diversification rates in sexual lineages, largely due to higher speciation rates in asexual lineages. We further reject the hypothesis that a loss of recombination and segregation is irreversible because the transition rate from functional asexuality to sexuality is significantly greater than zero.and in fact exceeded the reverse rate. These results provide the first empirical evidence in support of the alternative theoretical prediction that asexual populations should instead diversify more rapidly than sexual populations because they are free from the homogenizing effects of sexual recombination and segregation. Although asexual reproduction may often constrain adaptive evolution, our results show that the loss of recombination and segregation need not be an evolutionary dead-end in terms of diversification of lineages.
Authors
- Johnson, Marc T. J. ;
- FitzJohn, Richard Gareth ;
- Smith, Stacey D. ;
- Rausher, Mark D. ;
- Otto, Sarah P.
No description available
Authors
- Johnson, Marc T. J. ;
- FitzJohn, Richard Gareth ;
- Smith, Stacey D. ;
- Rausher, Mark D. ;
- Otto, Sarah P. ;
- Johnson, Marc T. J. ;
- FitzJohn, Richard Gareth ;
- Smith, Stacey D. ;
- Rausher, Mark D. ;
- Otto, Sarah P.
No description available
Authors
- Johnson, Marc T. J. ;
- FitzJohn, Richard Gareth ;
- Smith, Stacey D. ;
- Rausher, Mark D. ;
- Otto, Sarah P. ;
- Johnson, Marc T. J. ;
- FitzJohn, Richard Gareth ;
- Smith, Stacey D. ;
- Rausher, Mark D. ;
- Otto, Sarah P.
No description available
Authors
- Johnson, Marc T. J. ;
- FitzJohn, Richard Gareth ;
- Smith, Stacey D. ;
- Rausher, Mark D. ;
- Otto, Sarah P. ;
- Johnson, Marc T. J. ;
- FitzJohn, Richard Gareth ;
- Smith, Stacey D. ;
- Rausher, Mark D. ;
- Otto, Sarah P.