Automated Author ProfileDel Rosario, Mario
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência0000-0002-0430-1463
Del Rosario, Mario
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 2.1 (sum of 4 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Here we provide test datasets and a training manual for the parameter optimization with eSRRF. The training manual will guide users through an eSRRF paramenter optimization routine and quantiative image quality assesment with both, the ImagJ-Plugin NanoJ-eSRRF (Chapter 1) and the python implementation NanoPyx-eSRRF (Chapter 2). By showcasing the optimization routine on three differnt test dataset (Chapter 3), providing intermediate results and expected outcome, the users can eaisily learn how to find the optimal processing parameters for eSRRF processing.Three samples are provided to showcase the eSRRF reconstruction process:1. Microtubules sample: Set01_DNA-PAINT_Microtubules.tifDNA-PAINT microscopy measurement of immunolabeled microtubules in fixed COS-7 cells, showing 0.121 localizations per frame and µm^2 (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)108x90 pixels, 500 frames, pixel size: 160 nm 2. Kidney sample: Set02_KidneySDNephrinExM.tifHuman kidney biopsies stained with nephrin (data published in Kylies et al.)150x150 pixels, 200 frames, pixel size: 102 nm 3. Single emitters simulation: Set03_simulation_groundTruth_2p5Sigma - Fluorescence stack_Avg5.tifSimulated individual molecules emitting placed on concentric rings with radii increasing by 220 nm steps. On each ring the molecules are separated by 57.5, 115, 173, 230, 288 and 345 nm, respectively (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)33x33 pixels, 100 frames, pixel size: 100 nm Jupyter-Notebook: ridge_detection.ipynbWith this notebook qantitative image analyis of sturctures resolved with ExSRRF can be performed.Such as: calculation of the target structure density. identifying areas with high inter-ridge spacing by maping the distance to the nearest ridge based on Euclidean distance transform. measuring the spatial uniformity of the structure of interest by examining the distribution of the local densities and the distances to the nearest ridge.
Authors
- Kylies, Dominik ;
- Heil, Hannah ;
- Vesga, Arturo G. ;
- Del Rosario, Mario ;
- Schwerk, Maria ;
- Kuehl, Malte ;
- Wong, Milagros N. ;
- Puelles, Victor ;
- Henriques, Ricardo
Here we provide test datasets and a training manual for the parameter optimization with eSRRF. The training manual will guide users through an eSRRF paramenter optimization routine and quantiative image quality assesment with both, the ImagJ-Plugin NanoJ-eSRRF (Chapter 1) and the python implementation NanoPyx-eSRRF (Chapter 2). By showcasing the optimization routine on three differnt test dataset (Chapter 3), providing intermediate results and expected outcome, the users can eaisily learn how to find the optimal processing parameters for eSRRF processing.Three samples are provided to showcase the eSRRF reconstruction process:1. Microtubules sample: Set01_DNA-PAINT_Microtubules.tifDNA-PAINT microscopy measurement of immunolabeled microtubules in fixed COS-7 cells, showing 0.121 localizations per frame and µm^2 (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)108x90 pixels, 500 frames, pixel size: 160 nm 2. Kidney sample: Set02_KidneySDNephrinExM.tifExM of human kidney biopsies stained with nephrin (data published in Kylies et al.)150x150 pixels, 200 frames, pixel size: 102 nm 3. Single emitters simulation: Set03_simulation_groundTruth_2p5Sigma - Fluorescence stack_Avg5.tifSimulated individual molecules emitting placed on concentric rings with radii increasing by 220 nm steps. On each ring the molecules are separated by 57.5, 115, 173, 230, 288 and 345 nm, respectively (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)33x33 pixels, 100 frames, pixel size: 100 nm 4. Test dataset for drift/vibration correction: Set04_ExSRRF_eSRRF_vibration_correction_practice_dataset.tifEsM of human kidney biopsies stained with nephrin (data published in Kylies et al.)100x100 pixels, 200 frames, pixel size: 102 nm5. Test dataset for photobleaching: Set05_Photobleaching.tifExM of 120 nm Nanorulers (data published in Kylies et al.)150x150 pixels, 75 frames, pixel size: 64 nm Jupyter-Notebook: ridge_detection.ipynbWith this notebook qantitative image analyis of sturctures resolved with ExSRRF can be performed.Such as:calculation of the target structure density. identifying areas with high inter-ridge spacing by maping the distance to the nearest ridge based on Euclidean distance transform. measuring the spatial uniformity of the structure of interest by examining the distribution of the local densities and the distances to the nearest ridge.
Authors
- Kylies, Dominik ;
- Heil, Hannah S. ;
- Vesga, Arturo G. ;
- Del Rosario, Mario ;
- Schwerk, Maria ;
- Kuehl, Malte ;
- Wong, Milagros N. ;
- Puelles, Victor ;
- Henriques, Ricardo
Here we provide test datasets and a training manual for the parameter optimization with eSRRF. The training manual will guide users through an eSRRF paramenter optimization routine and quantiative image quality assesment with both, the ImagJ-Plugin NanoJ-eSRRF (Chapter 1) and the python implementation NanoPyx-eSRRF (Chapter 2). By showcasing the optimization routine on three differnt test dataset (Chapter 3), providing intermediate results and expected outcome, the users can eaisily learn how to find the optimal processing parameters for eSRRF processing.Three samples are provided to showcase the eSRRF reconstruction process:1. Microtubules sample: Set01_DNA-PAINT_Microtubules.tifDNA-PAINT microscopy measurement of immunolabeled microtubules in fixed COS-7 cells, showing 0.121 localizations per frame and µm^2 (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)108x90 pixels, 500 frames, pixel size: 160 nm 2. Kidney sample: Set02_KidneySDNephrinExM.tifHuman kidney biopsies stained with nephrin (data published in Kylies et al.)150x150 pixels, 200 frames, pixel size: 102 nm 3. Single emitters simulation: Set03_simulation_groundTruth_2p5Sigma - Fluorescence stack_Avg5.tifSimulated individual molecules emitting placed on concentric rings with radii increasing by 220 nm steps. On each ring the molecules are separated by 57.5, 115, 173, 230, 288 and 345 nm, respectively (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)33x33 pixels, 100 frames, pixel size: 100 nm 4. Test dataset for drift/vibration correction: Set04_ExSRRF_eSRRF_vibration_correction_practice_dataset.tifHuman kidney biopsies stained with nephrin (data published in Kylies et al.)100x100 pixels, 200 frames, pixel size: 102 nm Jupyter-Notebook: ridge_detection.ipynbWith this notebook qantitative image analyis of sturctures resolved with ExSRRF can be performed.Such as:calculation of the target structure density. identifying areas with high inter-ridge spacing by maping the distance to the nearest ridge based on Euclidean distance transform. measuring the spatial uniformity of the structure of interest by examining the distribution of the local densities and the distances to the nearest ridge.
Authors
- Kylies, Dominik ;
- Heil, Hannah S. ;
- Vesga, Arturo G. ;
- Del Rosario, Mario ;
- Schwerk, Maria ;
- Kuehl, Malte ;
- Wong, Milagros N. ;
- Puelles, Victor ;
- Henriques, Ricardo
Here we provide test datasets and a training manual for the parameter optimization with eSRRF. The training manual will guide users through an eSRRF paramenter optimization routine and quantiative image quality assesment with both, the ImagJ-Plugin NanoJ-eSRRF (Chapter 1) and the python implementation NanoPyx-eSRRF (Chapter 2). By showcasing the optimization routine on three differnt test dataset (Chapter 3), providing intermediate results and expected outcome, the users can eaisily learn how to find the optimal processing parameters for eSRRF processing.Three samples are provided to showcase the eSRRF reconstruction process:1. Microtubules sample: Set01_DNA-PAINT_Microtubules.tifDNA-PAINT microscopy measurement of immunolabeled microtubules in fixed COS-7 cells, showing 0.121 localizations per frame and µm^2 (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)108x90 pixels, 500 frames, pixel size: 160 nm 2. Kidney sample: Set02_KidneySDNephrinExM.tifExM of human kidney biopsies stained with nephrin (data published in Kylies et al.)150x150 pixels, 200 frames, pixel size: 102 nm 3. Single emitters simulation: Set03_simulation_groundTruth_2p5Sigma - Fluorescence stack_Avg5.tifSimulated individual molecules emitting placed on concentric rings with radii increasing by 220 nm steps. On each ring the molecules are separated by 57.5, 115, 173, 230, 288 and 345 nm, respectively (data published in Laine and Heil et al.)33x33 pixels, 100 frames, pixel size: 100 nm 4. Test dataset for drift/vibration correction: Set04_ExSRRF_eSRRF_vibration_correction_practice_dataset.tifEsM of human kidney biopsies stained with nephrin (data published in Kylies et al.)100x100 pixels, 200 frames, pixel size: 102 nm5. Test dataset for photobleaching: Set05_Photobleaching.tifExM of 120 nm Nanorulers (data published in Kylies et al.)150x150 pixels, 75 frames, pixel size: 64 nm Jupyter-Notebook: ridge_detection.ipynbWith this notebook qantitative image analyis of sturctures resolved with ExSRRF can be performed.Such as:calculation of the target structure density. identifying areas with high inter-ridge spacing by maping the distance to the nearest ridge based on Euclidean distance transform. measuring the spatial uniformity of the structure of interest by examining the distribution of the local densities and the distances to the nearest ridge.
Authors
- Kylies, Dominik ;
- Heil, Hannah S. ;
- Vesga, Arturo G. ;
- Del Rosario, Mario ;
- Schwerk, Maria ;
- Kuehl, Malte ;
- Wong, Milagros N. ;
- Puelles, Victor ;
- Henriques, Ricardo