Automated Author ProfileSandin, Leonard
Sandin, Leonard
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.7 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
(c) The Authors CC BY 4.0Supplementary files for article The relationships between biotic uniqueness and abiotic uniqueness are context dependent across drainage basins worldwideContextGlobal change, including land-use change and habitat degradation, has led to a decline in biodiversity, more so in freshwater than in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the research on freshwaters lags behind terrestrial and marine studies, highlighting the need for innovative approaches to comprehend freshwater biodiversity.ObjectivesWe investigated patterns in the relationships between biotic uniqueness and abiotic environmental uniqueness in drainage basins worldwide.MethodsWe compiled high-quality data on aquatic insects (mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies at genus-level) from 42 drainage basins spanning four continents. Within each basin we calculated biotic uniqueness (local contribution to beta diversity, LCBD) of aquatic insect assemblages, and four types of abiotic uniqueness (local contribution to environmental heterogeneity, LCEH), categorized into upstream land cover, chemical soil properties, stream site landscape position, and climate. A mixed-effects meta-regression was performed across basins to examine variations in the strength of the LCBD-LCEH relationship in terms of latitude, human footprint, and major continental regions (the Americas versus Eurasia).ResultsOn average, relationships between LCBD and LCEH were weak. However, the strength and direction of the relationship varied among the drainage basins. Latitude, human footprint index, or continental location did not explain significant variation in the strength of the LCBD-LCEH relationship.ConclusionsWe detected strong context dependence in the LCBD-LCEH relationship across the drainage basins. Varying environmental conditions and gradient lengths across drainage basins, land-use change, historical contingencies, and stochastic factors may explain these findings. This context dependence underscores the need for basin-specific management practices to protect the biodiversity of riverine systems.
Authors
- Snåre, Henna ;
- García-Girón, Jorge ;
- Alahuhta, Janne ;
- Mauricio Bini, Luis ;
- Boda, Pál ;
- Bonada, Núria ;
- S. Brasil, Leandro ;
- Callisto, Marcos ;
- M. P. Castro, Diego ;
- Chen, Kai ;
- Csabai, Zoltán ;
- Datry, Thibault ;
- Domisch, Sami ;
- R. García Márquez, Jaime ;
- Floury, Mathieu ;
- Friberg, Nikolai ;
- A. Gill, Brian ;
- David González-Trujillo, Juan ;
- Göthe, Emma ;
- Haase, Peter ;
- Hamada, Neusa ;
- J. Hill, Matthew ;
- Hjort, Jan ;
- Juen, Leandro ;
- F. Jupke, Jonathan ;
- Paula Justino de Faria, Ana ;
- Li, Zhengfei ;
- Ligeiro, Raphael ;
- S. Linares, Marden ;
- Luiza-Andrade, Ana ;
- R. Macedo, Diego ;
- Mathers, Kate ;
- Mellado-Díaz, Andres ;
- Milosevic, Djuradj ;
- Moya, Nabor ;
- LeRoy Poff, N. ;
- J. Rolls, Robert ;
- O. Roque, Fabio ;
- S. Saito, Victor ;
- Sandin, Leonard ;
- B. Schäfer, Ralf ;
- Scotti, Alberto ;
- Siqueira, Tadeu ;
- Tavares Martins, Renato ;
- Valente-Neto, Francisco ;
- Wang, Jun Wang, Beixin ;
- Xie, Zhicai ;
- Heino, Jani
(c) The Authors CC BY 4.0Supplementary files for article The relationships between biotic uniqueness and abiotic uniqueness are context dependent across drainage basins worldwideContextGlobal change, including land-use change and habitat degradation, has led to a decline in biodiversity, more so in freshwater than in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the research on freshwaters lags behind terrestrial and marine studies, highlighting the need for innovative approaches to comprehend freshwater biodiversity.ObjectivesWe investigated patterns in the relationships between biotic uniqueness and abiotic environmental uniqueness in drainage basins worldwide.MethodsWe compiled high-quality data on aquatic insects (mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies at genus-level) from 42 drainage basins spanning four continents. Within each basin we calculated biotic uniqueness (local contribution to beta diversity, LCBD) of aquatic insect assemblages, and four types of abiotic uniqueness (local contribution to environmental heterogeneity, LCEH), categorized into upstream land cover, chemical soil properties, stream site landscape position, and climate. A mixed-effects meta-regression was performed across basins to examine variations in the strength of the LCBD-LCEH relationship in terms of latitude, human footprint, and major continental regions (the Americas versus Eurasia).ResultsOn average, relationships between LCBD and LCEH were weak. However, the strength and direction of the relationship varied among the drainage basins. Latitude, human footprint index, or continental location did not explain significant variation in the strength of the LCBD-LCEH relationship.ConclusionsWe detected strong context dependence in the LCBD-LCEH relationship across the drainage basins. Varying environmental conditions and gradient lengths across drainage basins, land-use change, historical contingencies, and stochastic factors may explain these findings. This context dependence underscores the need for basin-specific management practices to protect the biodiversity of riverine systems.
Authors
- Snåre, Henna ;
- García-Girón, Jorge ;
- Alahuhta, Janne ;
- Mauricio Bini, Luis ;
- Boda, Pál ;
- Bonada, Núria ;
- S. Brasil, Leandro ;
- Callisto, Marcos ;
- M. P. Castro, Diego ;
- Chen, Kai ;
- Csabai, Zoltán ;
- Datry, Thibault ;
- Domisch, Sami ;
- R. García Márquez, Jaime ;
- Floury, Mathieu ;
- Friberg, Nikolai ;
- A. Gill, Brian ;
- David González-Trujillo, Juan ;
- Göthe, Emma ;
- Haase, Peter ;
- Hamada, Neusa ;
- J. Hill, Matthew ;
- Hjort, Jan ;
- Juen, Leandro ;
- F. Jupke, Jonathan ;
- Paula Justino de Faria, Ana ;
- Li, Zhengfei ;
- Ligeiro, Raphael ;
- S. Linares, Marden ;
- Luiza-Andrade, Ana ;
- R. Macedo, Diego ;
- Mathers, Kate ;
- Mellado-Díaz, Andres ;
- Milosevic, Djuradj ;
- Moya, Nabor ;
- LeRoy Poff, N. ;
- J. Rolls, Robert ;
- O. Roque, Fabio ;
- S. Saito, Victor ;
- Sandin, Leonard ;
- B. Schäfer, Ralf ;
- Scotti, Alberto ;
- Siqueira, Tadeu ;
- Tavares Martins, Renato ;
- Valente-Neto, Francisco ;
- Wang, Jun Wang, Beixin ;
- Xie, Zhicai ;
- Heino, Jani