Automated Author ProfileSchratt-Ehrendorfer, Luise
University of Vienna
Schratt-Ehrendorfer, Luise
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.8 (sum of 1 dataset Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aims at the conservation of all three levels of biodiversity, i.e. ecosystems, species and genes. Genetic diversity represents evolutionary potential and is important for ecosystem functioning. Unfortunately, genetic diversity in natural populations is hardly considered in conservation strategies because it is difficult to measure and has been hypothesized to co-vary with species richness. This means that species richness is taken as a surrogate of genetic diversity in conservation planning, though their relationship has not been properly evaluated. We tested whether the genetic and species levels of biodiversity co-vary, using a large-scale and multi-species approach. We chose the high-mountain flora of the Alps and the Carpathians as study systems and demonstrate that species richness and genetic diversity are not correlated. Species richness thus cannot act as a surrogate for genetic diversity. Our results have important consequences for implementing the CBD when designing conservation strategies.
Authors
- Taberlet, Pierre ;
- Zimmermann, Niklaus E. ;
- Englisch, Thorsten ;
- Tribsch, Andreas ;
- Holderegger, Rolf ;
- Alvarez, Nadir ;
- Niklfeld, Harald ;
- Mirek, Zbigniew ;
- Moilanen, Atte ;
- Ahlmer, Wolfgang ;
- Ajmone Marsan, Paolo ;
- Bona, Enzo ;
- Bovio, Maurizio ;
- Choler, Philippe ;
- Cieślak, Elżbieta ;
- Coldea, Gheorghe ;
- Colli, Licia ;
- Cristea, Vasile ;
- Dalmas, Jean-Pierre ;
- Frajman, Božo ;
- Garraud, Luc ;
- Gaudeul, Myriam ;
- Gielly, Ludovic ;
- Gutermann, Walter ;
- Jogan, Nejc ;
- Kagalo, Alexander A. ;
- Korbecka, Grażyna ;
- Küpfer, Philippe ;
- Lequette, Benoît ;
- Letz, Dominik Roman ;
- Manel, Stéphanie ;
- Mansion, Guilhelm ;
- Marhold, Karel ;
- Martini, Fabrizio ;
- Negrini, Riccardo ;
- Niño, Fernando ;
- Paun, Ovidiu ;
- Pellecchia, Marco ;
- Perico, Giovanni ;
- Piękoś-Mirkowa, Halina ;
- Prosser, Filippo ;
- Puşcaş, Mihai ;
- Ronikier, Michał ;
- Scheuerer, Martin ;
- Schneeweiss, Gerald M. ;
- Schönswetter, Peter ;
- Schratt-Ehrendorfer, Luise ;
- Schüpfer, Fanny ;
- Selvaggi, Alberto ;
- Steinmann, Katharina ;
- Thiel-Egenter, Conny ;
- van Loo, Marcela ;
- Winkler, Manuela ;
- Wohlgemuth, Thomas ;
- Wraber, Tone ;
- Gugerli, Felix ;
- Consortium, IntraBioDiv ;
- Marhold, Karol