Automated Author ProfileBaker, Jonathan
Weill Cornell Medicine
Baker, Jonathan
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.1 (sum of 1 dataset Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Invasive intracranial electrodes are used in both clinical and research applications for recording and stimulation of brain tissue, providing essential data in acute and chronic contexts. The impedance characteristics of the electrode–tissue interface (ETI) evolve over time and can change dramatically relative to pre-implantation baseline. Understanding how ETI properties contribute to the recording and stimulation characteristics of an electrode can provide valuable insights for users who often do not have access to complex impedance characterizations of their devices. In contrast to the typical method of characterizing electrical impedance at a single frequency, we demonstrate a method for using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to investigate complex characteristics of the ETI of several commonly used acute and chronic electrodes. We also describe precise modeling strategies for verifying the accuracy of our instrumentation and understanding device–solution interactions, both in vivo and in vitro. Included with this publication is a dataset containing both in vitro and in vivo device characterizations, as well as some examples of modeling and error structure analysis results. These data can be used for more detailed interpretation of neural recordings performed on common electrode types, providing a more complete picture of their properties than is often available to users.
Authors
- O'Sullivan, Kyle ;
- Philip, Brian ;
- Baker, Jonathan ;
- Orazem, Mark ;
- Otto, Kevin ;
- Butson, Christopher ;
- Rolston, John