Automated Author Profile

Rodewald, Amanda D.

Current S-Index

14.6

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.9

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

16

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

79.1%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

0

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Data from: Network structure of avian mixed-species flocks decays with elevation and latitude across the Andes (Version: 1)

<b>Abstract</b><br/><p><span lang="EN-GB">B</span><span lang="EN-GB">irds in mixed-species flocks benefit from greater foraging efficiency and reduced predation but also face costs related to competition and activity matching. Because this cost-benefit trade-off is context-dependent (e.g., abiotic conditions, habitat quality), the structure of flocks is expected to vary along elevational, latitudinal, and disturbance gradients. Specifically, we predicted that the connectivity and cohesion of flocking networks would (1) decline towards tropical latitudes and lower elevations, where competition and activity matching costs are higher, and (2) increase with lower forest cover and greater human disturbance. We analysed the structure of 84 flock networks across the Andes and assessed the effect of elevation, latitude, forest cover and human disturbance on network characteristics. We found that Andean flocks are overall open-membership systems (unstructured), though the extent of network structure varied across gradients. Elevation was the main predictor of structure, with more connected and less modular flocks upslope. As expected, flocks in areas with higher forest cover were less cohesive, with better-defined flock subtypes. Flocks also varied across latitude and disturbance gradients as predicted, but effect sizes were small. Our findings indicate that the unstructured nature of Andean flocks might arise as a strategy to cope with harsh environmental conditions.</span></p>

Authors

  • Montaño-Centellas, Flavia A. ;
  • Jones, Harrison ;
  • Ausprey, Ian ;
  • Newell, Felicity ;
  • Munoz, Jenny ;
  • Mangini, G. Giselle ;
  • Fanjul, M. Elisa ;
  • Tinoco, Boris ;
  • Colorado, Gabriel ;
  • Cahill, Jennifer ;
  • Arbelaez-Cortes, Enrique ;
  • Marin-Gomez, Oscar H. ;
  • Astudillo, Pedro X. ;
  • Guevara, Esteban ;
  • Ippi, Silvina ;
  • McDermott, Molly ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D. ;
  • Matthysen, Erik ;
  • Robinson, Scott K.
0 Citations0 Mentions42% FAIR1.0 Dataset Index
10.14288/1.04397952023

Appendix C. Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of resighting an individual in a future year and the number of nesting attempts made within a season .

Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of resighting an individual in a future year and the number of nesting attempts made within a season .

Authors

  • Shustack, Daniel P. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D.
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.35154922016

Appendix C. Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of resighting an individual in a future year and the number of nesting attempts made within a season .

Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of resighting an individual in a future year and the number of nesting attempts made within a season .

Authors

  • Shustack, Daniel P. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D.
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.3515492.v12016

Appendix B. Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of nest survival and the probability of renesting within a season.

Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of nest survival and the probability of renesting within a season.

Authors

  • Shustack, Daniel P. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D.
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.35154952016

Appendix B. Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of nest survival and the probability of renesting within a season.

Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the probability of nest survival and the probability of renesting within a season.

Authors

  • Shustack, Daniel P. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D.
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.3515495.v12016

Appendix A. Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the number of fledglings produced over the season (negative binomial regression) and the natural logarithm of day of the year of clutch initiation (least-squares regression).

Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the number of fledglings produced over the season (negative binomial regression) and the natural logarithm of day of the year of clutch initiation (least-squares regression).

Authors

  • Shustack, Daniel P. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D.
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.35155012016

Appendix A. Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the number of fledglings produced over the season (negative binomial regression) and the natural logarithm of day of the year of clutch initiation (least-squares regression).

Parameter estimates relating individual morphology variables and urbanization to the number of fledglings produced over the season (negative binomial regression) and the natural logarithm of day of the year of clutch initiation (least-squares regression).

Authors

  • Shustack, Daniel P. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D.
0 Citations0 Mentions85% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.3515501.v12016

Appendix D. Results of the conservation status permutation tests.

Results of the conservation status permutation tests.

Authors

  • Sorte, Frank A. La ;
  • Fink, Daniel ;
  • Hochachka, Wesley M. ;
  • Aycrigg, Jocelyn L. ;
  • Rosenberg, Kenneth V. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D. ;
  • Bruns, Nicholas E. ;
  • Farnsworth, Andrew ;
  • Sullivan, Brian L. ;
  • Wood, Chris ;
  • Kelling, Steve
0 Citations0 Mentions81% FAIR0.9 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.35201482016

Appendix C. The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.

The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.

Authors

  • Sorte, Frank A. La ;
  • Fink, Daniel ;
  • Hochachka, Wesley M. ;
  • Aycrigg, Jocelyn L. ;
  • Rosenberg, Kenneth V. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D. ;
  • Bruns, Nicholas E. ;
  • Farnsworth, Andrew ;
  • Sullivan, Brian L. ;
  • Wood, Chris ;
  • Kelling, Steve
0 Citations0 Mentions81% FAIR2.0 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.35201512016

Appendix C. The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.

The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.

Authors

  • Sorte, Frank A. La ;
  • Fink, Daniel ;
  • Hochachka, Wesley M. ;
  • Aycrigg, Jocelyn L. ;
  • Rosenberg, Kenneth V. ;
  • Rodewald, Amanda D. ;
  • Bruns, Nicholas E. ;
  • Farnsworth, Andrew ;
  • Sullivan, Brian L. ;
  • Wood, Chris ;
  • Kelling, Steve
0 Citations0 Mentions81% FAIR2.0 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.3520151.v12016