Automated Author ProfileE., Qi
E., Qi
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.4 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Introduction: It is challenging to diagnose liver masses in the context of a rough liver background using CT and MRI. Perfluorobutane (PFB) CEUS microbubble, an ultrasound contrast agent, has a unique phase called the Kupffer phase. This study aimed to explore whether the diagnostic ability of Kupffer-CEUS is affected by the rough liver background.Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted on patients with access to histological pathology of FLLs and liver parenchyma from 23 centers between August 2020 and March 2021. Kupffer-CEUS was performed on 552 patients, who were divided into two groups (normal and abnormal) based on the pathological results of liver parenchyma, and the abnormal group was further divided into four groups (Sight liver fibrosis, Serious liver fibrosis, Fatty liver, Mixed). Kupffer-CEUS was divided into vascular phase and vascular & Kupffer phase.Results: In Kupffer-CEUS, differences in diagnostic efficiency of FLLs between normal and abnormal liver backgrounds were not statistically significant. However, in patients with abnormal liver backgrounds, the specificity (57.45% vs. 74.47%, P=0.008) and accuracy (89.81% vs. 96.92%, P<0.001) of the vascular phase in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions were statistically lower than those of the vascular & Kupffer phase. Subgroup analysis revealed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of vascular & Kupffer phase in screening FLLs were all higher than those of vascular phase, except for the accuracy in patients with serious liver fibrosis (98.51% vs. 94.06, P<0.001).Conclusion: This study indicated that although there is no obvious restriction on the choice of Kupffer-CEUS methods when diagnosing liver masses in patients with normal or abnormal liver backgrounds, Kupffer phase CEUS can effectively reduce the misdiagnosis of FLLs. Particularly for patients with serious liver fibrosis, contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with the Kupffer phase can provide a more accurate diagnosis than conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Authors
- Y., Li ;
- X.-L., Yu ;
- X., Jing ;
- H., Yang ;
- K., Li ;
- W., Wu ;
- S., Lu ;
- H., Ding ;
- G., Liu ;
- W., Cheng ;
- G., He ;
- Y., Luo ;
- L., Liu ;
- T., Jiang ;
- G., Zhou ;
- X., Xie ;
- Z., Song ;
- F.-Y., Liu ;
- J., Yu ;
- Z.Y., Han ;
- Z.-G., Cheng ;
- S., Tan ;
- J., Xi ;
- X., Dong ;
- E., Qi ;
- J., Yao ;
- P., Liang
Introduction: It is challenging to diagnose liver masses in the context of a rough liver background using CT and MRI. Perfluorobutane (PFB) CEUS microbubble, an ultrasound contrast agent, has a unique phase called the Kupffer phase. This study aimed to explore whether the diagnostic ability of Kupffer-CEUS is affected by the rough liver background.Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted on patients with access to histological pathology of FLLs and liver parenchyma from 23 centers between August 2020 and March 2021. Kupffer-CEUS was performed on 552 patients, who were divided into two groups (normal and abnormal) based on the pathological results of liver parenchyma, and the abnormal group was further divided into four groups (Sight liver fibrosis, Serious liver fibrosis, Fatty liver, Mixed). Kupffer-CEUS was divided into vascular phase and vascular & Kupffer phase.Results: In Kupffer-CEUS, differences in diagnostic efficiency of FLLs between normal and abnormal liver backgrounds were not statistically significant. However, in patients with abnormal liver backgrounds, the specificity (57.45% vs. 74.47%, P=0.008) and accuracy (89.81% vs. 96.92%, P<0.001) of the vascular phase in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions were statistically lower than those of the vascular & Kupffer phase. Subgroup analysis revealed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of vascular & Kupffer phase in screening FLLs were all higher than those of vascular phase, except for the accuracy in patients with serious liver fibrosis (98.51% vs. 94.06, P<0.001).Conclusion: This study indicated that although there is no obvious restriction on the choice of Kupffer-CEUS methods when diagnosing liver masses in patients with normal or abnormal liver backgrounds, Kupffer phase CEUS can effectively reduce the misdiagnosis of FLLs. Particularly for patients with serious liver fibrosis, contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with the Kupffer phase can provide a more accurate diagnosis than conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Authors
- Y., Li ;
- X.-L., Yu ;
- X., Jing ;
- H., Yang ;
- K., Li ;
- W., Wu ;
- S., Lu ;
- H., Ding ;
- G., Liu ;
- W., Cheng ;
- G., He ;
- Y., Luo ;
- L., Liu ;
- T., Jiang ;
- G., Zhou ;
- X., Xie ;
- Z., Song ;
- F.-Y., Liu ;
- J., Yu ;
- Z.Y., Han ;
- Z.-G., Cheng ;
- S., Tan ;
- J., Xi ;
- X., Dong ;
- E., Qi ;
- J., Yao ;
- P., Liang