Automated Author ProfilePittrow, David
Pittrow, David
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 1.5 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
The PERI-DYS study evaluates patients at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk, including those who receive PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9-mAb) and those who are eligible for PCSK9-mAb but do not receive them. This is a prospective observational registry at 70 sites in Germany, categorising patients by PCSK9-mAb treatment status at baseline. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) changes and factors influencing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification were assessed after one year. Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03110432. Among 1565 patients, LDL-C levels decreased from 91.0 mg/dL at baseline to 73.5 mg/dL at 6 months and 71.5 mg/dL at 12 months. A total of 33.1% achieved the LDL-C goal (<55 mg/dL) according to EAS/ESC dyslipidaemia guidelines, with achievement rates ranging from 16.3% in those without PCSK9-mAb and statins to 50.5% in those on combined PCSK9-mAb, statins, and/or ezetimibe. Lipid intensity changed in 22.3% of patients, with 14.8% experiencing intensification and 9.3% reduction. Significant predictors of LLT intensification included younger age (odds ratio (OR) for 60+ years 0.73), no baseline ezetimibe (OR 0.43), LDL-C > 100 mg/dL (OR 3.90), and statin intolerance (OR 0.68). Despite eligibility for PCSK9-mAb treatment and management by specialised physicians, most patients did not reach the LDL-C target, and LLT intensification was rare. This suggests an underutilisation of available treatments, highlighting a gap in the management of high CV risk patients.
Authors
- Parhofer, Klaus G. ;
- Pittrow, David ;
- Birkenfeld, Andreas L. ;
- Fraass, Uwe ;
- Hohenstein, Bernd ;
- Siegert, Carsten ;
- Klotsche, Jens ;
- Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elisabeth ;
- Dexl, Stefan ;
- Schettler, Volker J. J. ;
- Laufs, Ulrich
The PERI-DYS study evaluates patients at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk, including those who receive PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9-mAb) and those who are eligible for PCSK9-mAb but do not receive them. This is a prospective observational registry at 70 sites in Germany, categorising patients by PCSK9-mAb treatment status at baseline. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) changes and factors influencing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification were assessed after one year. Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03110432. Among 1565 patients, LDL-C levels decreased from 91.0 mg/dL at baseline to 73.5 mg/dL at 6 months and 71.5 mg/dL at 12 months. A total of 33.1% achieved the LDL-C goal (<55 mg/dL) according to EAS/ESC dyslipidaemia guidelines, with achievement rates ranging from 16.3% in those without PCSK9-mAb and statins to 50.5% in those on combined PCSK9-mAb, statins, and/or ezetimibe. Lipid intensity changed in 22.3% of patients, with 14.8% experiencing intensification and 9.3% reduction. Significant predictors of LLT intensification included younger age (odds ratio (OR) for 60+ years 0.73), no baseline ezetimibe (OR 0.43), LDL-C > 100 mg/dL (OR 3.90), and statin intolerance (OR 0.68). Despite eligibility for PCSK9-mAb treatment and management by specialised physicians, most patients did not reach the LDL-C target, and LLT intensification was rare. This suggests an underutilisation of available treatments, highlighting a gap in the management of high CV risk patients.
Authors
- Parhofer, Klaus G. ;
- Pittrow, David ;
- Birkenfeld, Andreas L. ;
- Fraass, Uwe ;
- Hohenstein, Bernd ;
- Siegert, Carsten ;
- Klotsche, Jens ;
- Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elisabeth ;
- Dexl, Stefan ;
- Schettler, Volker J. J. ;
- Laufs, Ulrich