Automated Author Profile

Pittrow, David

Current S-Index

1.5

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.8

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

2

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

80.8%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

2

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Determinants of lipid lowering therapy intensification in very high risk patients with dyslipidaemia eligible for PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies: 1-year outcomes of the PERI-DYS study

The PERI-DYS study evaluates patients at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk, including those who receive PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9-mAb) and those who are eligible for PCSK9-mAb but do not receive them. This is a prospective observational registry at 70 sites in Germany, categorising patients by PCSK9-mAb treatment status at baseline. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) changes and factors influencing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification were assessed after one year. Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03110432. Among 1565 patients, LDL-C levels decreased from 91.0 mg/dL at baseline to 73.5 mg/dL at 6 months and 71.5 mg/dL at 12 months. A total of 33.1% achieved the LDL-C goal (<55 mg/dL) according to EAS/ESC dyslipidaemia guidelines, with achievement rates ranging from 16.3% in those without PCSK9-mAb and statins to 50.5% in those on combined PCSK9-mAb, statins, and/or ezetimibe. Lipid intensity changed in 22.3% of patients, with 14.8% experiencing intensification and 9.3% reduction. Significant predictors of LLT intensification included younger age (odds ratio (OR) for 60+ years 0.73), no baseline ezetimibe (OR 0.43), LDL-C > 100 mg/dL (OR 3.90), and statin intolerance (OR 0.68). Despite eligibility for PCSK9-mAb treatment and management by specialised physicians, most patients did not reach the LDL-C target, and LLT intensification was rare. This suggests an underutilisation of available treatments, highlighting a gap in the management of high CV risk patients.

Authors

  • Parhofer, Klaus G. ;
  • Pittrow, David ;
  • Birkenfeld, Andreas L. ;
  • Fraass, Uwe ;
  • Hohenstein, Bernd ;
  • Siegert, Carsten ;
  • Klotsche, Jens ;
  • Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elisabeth ;
  • Dexl, Stefan ;
  • Schettler, Volker J. J. ;
  • Laufs, Ulrich
1 Citation0 Mentions81% FAIR0.8 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.290387842025

Determinants of lipid lowering therapy intensification in very high risk patients with dyslipidaemia eligible for PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies: 1-year outcomes of the PERI-DYS study

The PERI-DYS study evaluates patients at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk, including those who receive PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9-mAb) and those who are eligible for PCSK9-mAb but do not receive them. This is a prospective observational registry at 70 sites in Germany, categorising patients by PCSK9-mAb treatment status at baseline. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) changes and factors influencing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification were assessed after one year. Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03110432. Among 1565 patients, LDL-C levels decreased from 91.0 mg/dL at baseline to 73.5 mg/dL at 6 months and 71.5 mg/dL at 12 months. A total of 33.1% achieved the LDL-C goal (<55 mg/dL) according to EAS/ESC dyslipidaemia guidelines, with achievement rates ranging from 16.3% in those without PCSK9-mAb and statins to 50.5% in those on combined PCSK9-mAb, statins, and/or ezetimibe. Lipid intensity changed in 22.3% of patients, with 14.8% experiencing intensification and 9.3% reduction. Significant predictors of LLT intensification included younger age (odds ratio (OR) for 60+ years 0.73), no baseline ezetimibe (OR 0.43), LDL-C > 100 mg/dL (OR 3.90), and statin intolerance (OR 0.68). Despite eligibility for PCSK9-mAb treatment and management by specialised physicians, most patients did not reach the LDL-C target, and LLT intensification was rare. This suggests an underutilisation of available treatments, highlighting a gap in the management of high CV risk patients.

Authors

  • Parhofer, Klaus G. ;
  • Pittrow, David ;
  • Birkenfeld, Andreas L. ;
  • Fraass, Uwe ;
  • Hohenstein, Bernd ;
  • Siegert, Carsten ;
  • Klotsche, Jens ;
  • Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elisabeth ;
  • Dexl, Stefan ;
  • Schettler, Volker J. J. ;
  • Laufs, Ulrich
1 Citation0 Mentions81% FAIR0.8 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.29038784.v12025