Automated Author ProfileFares, Nizar
Fares, Nizar
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 11.3 (sum of 7 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Describing an unfamiliar face can impede its later recognition. This phenomenon, known as the verbal overshadowing effect, is one of the most problematic issues affecting eyewitness testimony. This study examined whether generating a name for a target face could mitigate VOE and enhance lineup identification accuracy. Participants were assigned to one of four face naming conditions: (a) immediately after viewing the target person, (b) just before describing the target face, (c) prior to the identification task, or (d) no face naming (control). Results showed that participants who generated a name immediately before describing the face showed significantly higher identification accuracy than those in other naming conditions or the control group. Face naming appears to strengthen familiarity, making facial representation more robust against the disruptive effects of verbalization. These findings introduce the “face name generating effect” as a promising cognitive intervention for preserving the eyewitness memory integrity.
Authors
- Fares, Nizar ;
- Mathlouthi, Sihem ;
- Hajji, Souad ;
- Trad, Ichraf
Describing an unfamiliar face can impede its later recognition. This phenomenon, known as the verbal overshadowing effect, is one of the most problematic issues affecting eyewitness testimony. This study examined whether generating a name for a target face could mitigate VOE and enhance lineup identification accuracy. Participants were assigned to one of four face naming conditions: (a) immediately after viewing the target person, (b) just before describing the target face, (c) prior to the identification task, or (d) no face naming (control). Results showed that participants who generated a name immediately before describing the face showed significantly higher identification accuracy than those in other naming conditions or the control group. Face naming appears to strengthen familiarity, making facial representation more robust against the disruptive effects of verbalization. These findings introduce the “face name generating effect” as a promising cognitive intervention for preserving the eyewitness memory integrity.
Authors
- Fares, Nizar ;
- Mathlouthi, Sihem ;
- Hajji, Souad ;
- Trad, Ichraf
Describing an unfamiliar face can impede its later recognition. This phenomenon, known as the verbal overshadowing effect, is one of the most problematic issues affecting eyewitness testimony. This study examined whether generating a name for a target face could mitigate VOE and enhance lineup identification accuracy. Participants were assigned to one of four face naming conditions: (a) immediately after viewing the target person, (b) just before describing the target face, (c) prior to the identification task, or (d) no face naming (control). Results showed that participants who generated a name immediately before describing the face showed significantly higher identification accuracy than those in other naming conditions or the control group. Face naming appears to strengthen familiarity, making facial representation more robust against the disruptive effects of verbalization. These findings introduce the “face name generating effect” as a promising cognitive intervention for preserving the eyewitness memory integrity.
Authors
- Fares, Nizar ;
- Mathlouthi, Sihem ;
- Hajji, Souad ;
- Trad, Ichraf
This study explored the relationship between attachment styles and humor styles. Using both dimensional and categorical approaches to assess attachment, we examined how attachment patterns relate to four humor styles (affiliative, self-enhancing, self-defeating, and aggressive). The results revealed significant associations between the two variables. Specifically, attachment anxiety was positively correlated with self-defeating humor and negatively with self-enhancing humor, while attachment avoidance was linked to aggressive humor. From a categorical perspective, fearful attachment was found to be associated with both aggressive and self-defeating humor, while preoccupied attachment was notably related to self-defeating humor. The study also validated the Relationship Scale Questionnaire among a sample of Tunisians (N = 162), thereby supporting the robustness of the two-dimensional attachment model through confirmatory factor analysis. However, cultural specificity of attachment patterns influenced the specific items that define each dimension, suggesting that humor, as an attachment-related behavior, could be shaped by sociocultural norms.
Authors
- Fares, Nizar ;
- Ben Tanfous, Maha
This study explored the relationship between attachment styles and humor styles. Using both dimensional and categorical approaches to assess attachment, we examined how attachment patterns relate to four humor styles (affiliative, self-enhancing, self-defeating, and aggressive). The results revealed significant associations between the two variables. Specifically, attachment anxiety was positively correlated with self-defeating humor and negatively with self-enhancing humor, while attachment avoidance was linked to aggressive humor. From a categorical perspective, fearful attachment was found to be associated with both aggressive and self-defeating humor, while preoccupied attachment was notably related to self-defeating humor. The study also validated the Relationship Scale Questionnaire among a sample of Tunisians (N = 162), thereby supporting the robustness of the two-dimensional attachment model through confirmatory factor analysis. However, cultural specificity of attachment patterns influenced the specific items that define each dimension, suggesting that humor, as an attachment-related behavior, could be shaped by sociocultural norms.
Authors
- Fares, Nizar ;
- Ben Tanfous, Maha
Describing an unfamiliar face can impede its later recognition. This phenomenon, known as the verbal overshadowing effect, is one of the most problematic issues affecting eyewitness testimony. This study examined whether generating a name for a target face could mitigate VOE and enhance lineup identification accuracy. Participants were assigned to one of four face naming conditions: (a) immediately after viewing the target person, (b) just before describing the target face, (c) prior to the identification task, or (d) no face naming (control). Results showed that participants who generated a name immediately before describing the face showed significantly higher identification accuracy than those in other naming conditions or the control group. Face naming appears to strengthen familiarity, making facial representation more robust against the disruptive effects of verbalization. These findings introduce the “face name generating effect” as a promising cognitive intervention for preserving the eyewitness memory integrity.
Authors
- Fares, Nizar
This study explored the relationship between attachment styles and humor styles. Using both dimensional and categorical approaches to assess attachment, we examined how attachment patterns relate to four humor styles (affiliative, self-enhancing, self-defeating, and aggressive). The results revealed significant associations between the two variables. Specifically, attachment anxiety was positively correlated with self-defeating humor and negatively with self-enhancing humor, while attachment avoidance was linked to aggressive humor. From a categorical perspective, fearful attachment was found to be associated with both aggressive and self-defeating humor, while preoccupied attachment was notably related to self-defeating humor. The study also validated the Relationship Scale Questionnaire among a sample of Tunisians (N = 162), thereby supporting the robustness of the two-dimensional attachment model through confirmatory factor analysis. However, cultural specificity of attachment patterns influenced the specific items that define each dimension, suggesting that humor, as an attachment-related behavior, could be shaped by sociocultural norms.
Authors
- Fares, Nizar ;
- Ben Tanfous, Maha