Automated Author ProfileNoll, Matias
0000-0002-1482-0718https://osf.io/e5at7
Noll, Matias
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.3 (sum of 1 dataset Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Administrative Professionals’ Quality of Life in Educational Institutions: A Systematic ReviewIntroduction Indicators of administrative professionals’ quality of life (QoL) in educational institutions are essential for planning improvements in their daily lives. QoL is a recurring topic in academic research, particularly in the healthcare sector. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the perceptions of administrative professionals in educational institutions regarding their QoL and the implications of remote and in-person work. Additionally, we aim to compare the QoL before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods and analysis Five electronic databases will be searched for this systematic review: CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Original, peer-reviewed articles published in any language, without time limitations, will be included in this study. Two researchers will screen the articles and extract the data. The included articles will be evaluated for the quality of their evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the Downs and Black scale. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies.Ethics and dissemination The systematic review results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. The data will not include individual patient data; therefore, ethical approval is not required.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022365862 (see at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=365862).The paper that was published and that contains the protocol, titled "Administrative Professionals' Quality of Life in Educational Institutions: A Systematic Review Protocol", is available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074119
Authors
- Da Silva Valadão Fernandes, Michele ;
- Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva ;
- Noll, Matias ;
- Silva, Regina Márcia Ferreira ;
- ALBERTO DE VITTA ;
- Da Costa, Woska Pires ;
- Memon, Aamir Raoof ;
- De Oliveira, Isabela Fernanda Rodrigues ;
- Nicolli Godoi Pereira