Automated Author Profile

Brandt, Mark J.

Tilburg University

Current S-Index

8.5

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

2.8

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

3

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

70.5%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

6

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

1

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Experimental data for: Memory retrieval processes help explain the incumbency advantage. Judgement and Decision Making (Version: 1.0)

This data package includes the data and materials for the three experiments conducted on the project: Memory Retrieval Processes Help Explain the Incumbency Advantage.The research measures and manipulates participant sequential memory retrieval patterns while considering the choice between two political candidates. We find that the order in which participants retrieve information about the candidate from memory is related to a preference for the candidate already in office (incumbent).

Authors

  • Spälti, Anna Katharina ;
  • Brandt, Mark J. ;
  • Zeelenberg, Marcel
0 Citations0 Mentions100% FAIR2.5 Dataset Index
10.34894/nw1zs6January 2018

Replication Data for: Weirdness of disgust sensitivity items predicts their relationship to purity moral judgments (Version: 1.0)

Looked at was how the perceived weirdness of disgust sensitivity scale items was associated with moral judgments in multiple moral domains

Authors

  • Wagemans, Fieke M.A. ;
  • Brandt, Mark J. ;
  • Zeelenberg, Marcel
0 Citations0 Mentions96% FAIR2.4 Dataset Index
10.34894/nudwc5January 2018

Replication data for: Morality in Everyday Life (Version: 5.0)

To study morality in everyday life, we recruited a demographically and geographically diverse sample (1,252 adults aged 18 to 68 years) from the US and Canada. Each participant was randomly signaled five times daily for three days between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. At each assessment, participants indicated whether they committed, were the target of, witnessed, or learned about a moral or immoral act within the last hour. For each moral/immoral event participants provided contextual information on the moral event, and completed state measures of nine distinct moral emotions, momentary happiness, and sense of purpose. Demographic variables such as religiosity and political ideology were assessed during an intake survey upon study registration.

Authors

  • Hofmann, Wilhelm ;
  • Wisneski, Daniel C. ;
  • Brandt, Mark J. ;
  • Skitka, Linda J.
6 Citations1 Mention15% FAIR4.0 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/26910August 2014