Automated Author ProfileMoore, Julian
Midwestern University
Moore, Julian
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 2.2 (sum of 1 dataset Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Computed tomography (CT) enables rapid imaging of large-scale studies of bone, but those datasets typically require manual segmentation, which is time-consuming and prone to error. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer an automated solution, achieving superior performance on image data. Here, we used CNNs to train segmentation models from scratch on 2D and 3D patches from micro-CT scans of otter long bones. These new models, collectively called BONe (Bone One-shot Network), aimed to be fast and accurate, and we expected enhanced results from 3D training due to better spatial context. Our results showed that 3D training required substantially more memory. Contrary to expectations, 2D models performed slightly better than 3D models in labeling details such as thin trabecular bone. Although lacking in some detail, 3D models appeared to generalize better and predict smoother internal surfaces than 2D models. However, the massive computational costs of 3D models limit their scalability and practicality, leading us to recommend 2D models for bone segmentation. BONe models showed potential for broader applications with variation in performance across species and scan quality. Notably, BONe models demonstrated promising results on skull segmentation, suggesting their potential utility beyond long bones with further refinement and fine-tuning.
Authors
- Lee, Andrew ;
- Moore, Julian ;
- Vera Covarrubias, Brandon ;
- Lynch, Leigha