Automated Author ProfileSmit, Michelle
Smit, Michelle
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.2 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
The dataset, titled “Artificial Intelligence in South Africa: Survey Data of Master’s Students,” comprises two sheets, namely “Uncoded data” and “Coded data.” Both sheets comprise the raw data provided by the participants. The categorical data gathered via the ranking and statement selection questions were coded to enable variance analysis, regression analysis, and correlation analysis of the data. Therefore, in addition to the raw data, the “Coded data” sheet contains the data code associated with each survey data point. The “Uncoded Data” sheet contains, amongst others, columns for Participant ID, Gender (text), and Academic Year (text). The “Coded Data” sheet mirrors these columns and includes columns with numeric codes. The subsequent section details the coding process. Each row corresponds to a single participant’s responses. As the survey was completed anonymously, unique numeric participant IDs were automatically assigned to the participants’ answers by Microsoft Forms, the survey instrument.The dataset was organized into thematic sections to improve clarity, each corresponding to related questions. The combination of coded categorical variables and demographic information supports a range of statistical techniques, including reflective and formative measurement models, variance analyses, and regression analyses. This versatility allows other scholars to replicate or extend studies on AI, GenAI, and technology acceptance and usage within higher education. By serving as a baseline, this dataset can be integrated into longitudinal research. Future studies can compare these findings with cohorts from different regions or fields of study.
Authors
- Smit, Michelle ;
- Bond-Barnard, Taryn ;
- Wagner, Reinhard
The dataset, titled “Artificial Intelligence in South Africa: Survey Data of Master’s Students,” comprises two sheets, namely “Uncoded data” and “Coded data.” Both sheets comprise the raw data provided by the participants. The categorical data gathered via the ranking and statement selection questions were coded to enable variance analysis, regression analysis, and correlation analysis of the data. Therefore, in addition to the raw data, the “Coded data” sheet contains the data code associated with each survey data point. The “Uncoded Data” sheet contains, amongst others, columns for Participant ID, Gender (text), and Academic Year (text). The “Coded Data” sheet mirrors these columns and includes columns with numeric codes. The subsequent section details the coding process. Each row corresponds to a single participant’s responses. As the survey was completed anonymously, unique numeric participant IDs were automatically assigned to the participants’ answers by Microsoft Forms, the survey instrument.The dataset was organized into thematic sections to improve clarity, each corresponding to related questions. The combination of coded categorical variables and demographic information supports a range of statistical techniques, including reflective and formative measurement models, variance analyses, and regression analyses. This versatility allows other scholars to replicate or extend studies on AI, GenAI, and technology acceptance and usage within higher education. By serving as a baseline, this dataset can be integrated into longitudinal research. Future studies can compare these findings with cohorts from different regions or fields of study.
Authors
- Smit, Michelle ;
- Bond-Barnard, Taryn ;
- Wagner, Reinhard