Automated Author ProfileGray, Rowena
University of California-Merced
Gray, Rowena
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.5 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Replication package for "Tasks and Black-white Inequality over the Long Twentieth Century"
We present new evidence on the long-run evolution of occupational task content by race in the United States from 1900 to 2021. Black men began the transition to better-paid, cognitively intensive jobs at least a generation after white men and were instead concentrated in physically intensive jobs. Substantial convergence with white workers occurred only after 1960. Longitudinal data suggest that transitions to new task content were racially biased: Black men moved to jobs with lower rewarded task content than white men, conditional on initial task content, though these gaps decreased after World War II. Routine-intensive Black workers were less likely to move up into nonroutine analytic work compared with white workers in both historical and modern periods. The results suggest that task displacement shocks, such as the automation of routine manual work, widened Black-white inequality throughout the twentieth century, and these differential transitions remain a reason why labor market outcomes have not fully converged.
Authors
- Gray, Rowena ;
- O'Keefe, Siobhan ;
- Quincy, Sarah ;
- Ward, Zachary
Replication package for "Tasks and Black-white Inequality over the Long Twentieth Century"
We present new evidence on the long-run evolution of occupational task content by race in the United States from 1900 to 2021. Black men began the transition to better-paid, cognitively intensive jobs at least a generation after white men and were instead concentrated in physically intensive jobs. Substantial convergence with white workers occurred only after 1960. Longitudinal data suggest that transitions to new task content were racially biased: Black men moved to jobs with lower rewarded task content than white men, conditional on initial task content, though these gaps decreased after World War II. Routine-intensive Black workers were less likely to move up into nonroutine analytic work compared with white workers in both historical and modern periods. The results suggest that task displacement shocks, such as the automation of routine manual work, widened Black-white inequality throughout the twentieth century, and these differential transitions remain a reason why labor market outcomes have not fully converged.
Authors
- Gray, Rowena ;
- O'Keefe, Siobhan ;
- Quincy, Sarah ;
- Ward, Zachary