Automated Author ProfileAsare, Eric
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
Asare, Eric
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.2 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
This section provides granular Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data validating the hypothesis that plantain derived absorbent cores (PDCs) can outperform conventional wood/SAP alternatives environmentally only with optimized production. Four tables underpin the findings: Table S1 details process inputs/outputs per functional unit (240 cores), derived from scaled lab experiments and industrial equipment specs, quantifying resources like pseudostems, water and electricity. Table S2 breaks down environmental impacts per manufacturing phase using SimaPro generated metrics (CML/ReCiPe/AWARE methods), revealing materials preparation as the dominant hotspots. Table S3 compares four sensitivity scenarios: data confirms transport distance increases global warming 22%, while pre-drying biomass cuts transport emissions by 90%, and eliminating bleaching reduces human health damage by 52%. Table S4's uncertainty statistics show high reliability for climate impacts but low precision for water scarcity due to spatial variability in the AWARE method. Key finding shows electricity and chemicals are priority mitigation areas whiles yield variability drastically alters resource demands. Also manufacturers should adopt pre-drying and renewable energy to reverse PDC's higher carbon footprint versus SAP alternatives. Stakeholders can scale Table S1 inputs for production planning, use Table S3 to benchmark process changes, and apply Table S4's SEM/CQV metrics to gauge result robustness; noting water impacts require region specific refinement.
Authors
- Saeed, Rukaiya ;
- Akromah , Stefania ;
- Acquah, Jephtah Ogyefo ;
- Asare, Eric
This section provides granular Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data validating the hypothesis that plantain derived absorbent cores (PDCs) can outperform conventional wood/SAP alternatives environmentally only with optimized production. Four tables underpin the findings: Table S1 details process inputs/outputs per functional unit (240 cores), derived from scaled lab experiments and industrial equipment specs, quantifying resources like pseudostems, water and electricity. Table S2 breaks down environmental impacts per manufacturing phase using SimaPro generated metrics (CML/ReCiPe/AWARE methods), revealing materials preparation as the dominant hotspots. Table S3 compares four sensitivity scenarios: data confirms transport distance increases global warming 22%, while pre-drying biomass cuts transport emissions by 90%, and eliminating bleaching reduces human health damage by 52%. Table S4's uncertainty statistics show high reliability for climate impacts but low precision for water scarcity due to spatial variability in the AWARE method. Key finding shows electricity and chemicals are priority mitigation areas whiles yield variability drastically alters resource demands. Also manufacturers should adopt pre-drying and renewable energy to reverse PDC's higher carbon footprint versus SAP alternatives. Stakeholders can scale Table S1 inputs for production planning, use Table S3 to benchmark process changes, and apply Table S4's SEM/CQV metrics to gauge result robustness; noting water impacts require region specific refinement.
Authors
- Saeed, Rukaiya ;
- Akromah , Stefania ;
- Acquah, Jephtah Ogyefo ;
- Asare, Eric