Automated Author ProfileShan, Yuanqi
Shan, Yuanqi
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.0 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Plant functional traits serve as crucial indicators for assessing the status of ecosystems. However, accurately predicting leaf traits of rare species using spectral reflectance remains challenging because the limited sample sizes of rare species make it difficult to construct reliable spectral prediction models for them directly. The study hypothesized that the leaf traits of rare marsh species could be inferred from the modeling results of the dominant species, even with a limited sample size. To investigate this, we measured leaf reflectance spectra and eleven leaf functional traits across different species and established Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) models based on five combinations of plant families (All-families, Dominant-families, Non-Cyperaceae, Cyperaceae-Poaceae, and Cyperaceae) and six different sample sizes (40, 80, 120, 160, 200, and 240 samples). Our findings revealed that the PLSR models exhibited higher predictive performance for nitrogen (N, R_Val^2=0.87) and leaf water content (LWC, R_Val^2=0.85) compared to the other nine leaf traits. Notably, models constructed using the Dominant-families dataset (excluding rare species) exhibited predictive accuracy statistically comparable to the All-families dataset (which includes rare species) for all eleven traits. Additionally, we found that a minimum of 160 samples in the Dominant-families dataset was required to achieve reliable prediction for most leaf traits. This finding demonstrates that Dominant-families models can not only effectively substitute for All-families models but also provide a valid pathway to infer rare species’ leaf traits. By addressing the data scarcity challenge (i.e., insufficient samples of rare species) through dominant species sampling, prioritizing the collection of Dominant-families datasets meeting the 160-sample threshold offers a practical framework for predicting rare marsh species’ leaf traits.
Authors
- Shan, Yuanqi
Plant functional traits serve as crucial indicators for assessing the status of ecosystems. However, accurately predicting leaf traits of rare species using spectral reflectance remains challenging because the limited sample sizes of rare species make it difficult to construct reliable spectral prediction models for them directly. The study hypothesized that the leaf traits of rare marsh species could be inferred from the modeling results of the dominant species, even with a limited sample size. To investigate this, we measured leaf reflectance spectra and eleven leaf functional traits across different species and established Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) models based on five combinations of plant families (All-families, Dominant-families, Non-Cyperaceae, Cyperaceae-Poaceae, and Cyperaceae) and six different sample sizes (40, 80, 120, 160, 200, and 240 samples). Our findings revealed that the PLSR models exhibited higher predictive performance for nitrogen (N, R_Val^2=0.87) and leaf water content (LWC, R_Val^2=0.85) compared to the other nine leaf traits. Notably, models constructed using the Dominant-families dataset (excluding rare species) exhibited predictive accuracy statistically comparable to the All-families dataset (which includes rare species) for all eleven traits. Additionally, we found that a minimum of 160 samples in the Dominant-families dataset was required to achieve reliable prediction for most leaf traits. This finding demonstrates that Dominant-families models can not only effectively substitute for All-families models but also provide a valid pathway to infer rare species’ leaf traits. By addressing the data scarcity challenge (i.e., insufficient samples of rare species) through dominant species sampling, prioritizing the collection of Dominant-families datasets meeting the 160-sample threshold offers a practical framework for predicting rare marsh species’ leaf traits.
Authors
- Shan, Yuanqi