Automated Author ProfileHenschke, Claudia I.
Henschke, Claudia I.
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 239.3 (sum of 1 dataset Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
The Lung Image Database Consortium image collection (LIDC-IDRI) consists of diagnostic and lung cancer screening thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans with marked-up annotated lesions. It is a web-accessible international resource for development, training, and evaluation of computer-assisted diagnostic (CAD) methods for lung cancer detection and diagnosis. Initiated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), further advanced by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), and accompanied by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through active participation, this public-private partnership demonstrates the success of a consortium founded on a consensus-based process. Seven academic centers and eight medical imaging companies collaborated to create this data set which contains 1018 cases. Each subject includes images from a clinical thoracic CT scan and an associated XML file that records the results of a two-phase image annotation process performed by four experienced thoracic radiologists. In the initial blinded-read phase, each radiologist independently reviewed each CT scan and marked lesions belonging to one of three categories ("nodule > or =3 mm," "nodule <3 mm," and "non-nodule > or =3 mm"). In the subsequent unblinded-read phase, each radiologist independently reviewed their own marks along with the anonymized marks of the three other radiologists to render a final opinion. The goal of this process was to identify as completely as possible all lung nodules in each CT scan without requiring forced consensus.
Authors
- Armato III, Samuel G. ;
- McLennan, Geoffrey ;
- Bidaut, Luc ;
- McNitt-Gray, Michael F. ;
- Meyer, Charles R. ;
- Reeves, Anthony P. ;
- Zhao, Binsheng ;
- Aberle, Denise R. ;
- Henschke, Claudia I. ;
- Hoffman, Eric A. ;
- Kazerooni, Ella A. ;
- MacMahon, Heber ;
- Van Beek, Edwin J.R. ;
- Yankelevitz, David ;
- Biancardi, Alberto M. ;
- Bland, Peyton H. ;
- Brown, Matthew S. ;
- Engelmann, Roger M. ;
- Laderach, Gary E. ;
- Max, Daniel ;
- Pais, Richard C. ;
- Qing, David P.Y. ;
- Roberts, Rachael Y. ;
- Smith, Amanda R. ;
- Starkey, Adam ;
- Batra, Poonam ;
- Caligiuri, Philip ;
- Farooqi, Ali ;
- Gladish, Gregory W. ;
- Jude, C. Matilda ;
- Munden, Reginald F. ;
- Petkovska, Iva ;
- Quint, Leslie E. ;
- Schwartz, Lawrence H. ;
- Sundaram, Baskaran ;
- Dodd, Lori E. ;
- Fenimore, Charles ;
- Gur, David ;
- Petrick, Nicholas ;
- Freymann, John ;
- Kirby, Justin ;
- Hughes, Brian ;
- Casteele, Alessi Vande ;
- Gupte, Sangeeta ;
- Sallam, Maha ;
- Heath, Michael D. ;
- Kuhn, Michael H. ;
- Dharaiya, Ekta ;
- Burns, Richard ;
- Fryd, David S. ;
- Salganicoff, Marcos ;
- Anand, Vikram ;
- Shreter, Uri ;
- Vastagh, Stephen ;
- Croft, Barbara Y. ;
- Clarke, Laurence P.