Automated Author ProfileAngele, Bernhard
Angele, Bernhard
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.5 (sum of 5 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Sync with Zenodo and add data later
Authors
- Buchanan, Erin ;
- Cuccolo, Kelly ;
- Heyman, Tom ;
- Iyer, Aishwarya ;
- Coles, Nicholas ;
- Lewis Jr, Neil ;
- Peters, Kim ;
- van Berkel, Niels ;
- Taylor, Jack ;
- Van't Veer, Anna E. ;
- Montefinese, Maria ;
- Valentine, K.D. ;
- Maxwell, Nicholas ;
- Türkan, Belgüzar Nilay ;
- Williams, Glenn ;
- Oliveros-Chacana, Juan Carlos ;
- Röer, Jan ;
- Fini, Chiara ;
- Acar, Oguz ;
- McFall, Joseph ;
- Pronizius, Ekaterina ;
- Batalha, luisa ;
- Özdoğru, Asil ;
- Godbersen, Hendrik ;
- Butt, Muhammad Mussaffa ;
- Buczny, Jacek ;
- Suchow, Jordan ;
- Jaeger, Bastian ;
- Baker, Bradley J. ;
- Grim, Philip ;
- Alsuhaibani, Zainab ;
- Martínez, Martin ;
- Protzko, John ;
- Lynott, Dermot ;
- Korbmacher, Max ;
- PEKER, MEHMET ;
- Dixson, Barnaby ;
- Elsherif, Mahmoud ;
- Neta, Maital ;
- Azevedo, Flavio ;
- Roberto dos Santos Ferreira, Paulo ;
- Sigfrids, Fredrik ;
- Lima, Tiago ;
- Geiger, Sandra ;
- Thapar, Anjali ;
- Perea, Manuel ;
- Szekely-Copîndean, Raluca ;
- Evans, Thomas Rhys ;
- Verheyen, Steven ;
- Moreau, David ;
- Tran, Ulrich ;
- El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam ;
- Ndukaihe, Izuchukwu L. G. ;
- Pavlović, Tijana Vesić ;
- Burin, D. I. ;
- Arriaga, Patrícia ;
- Kasanov, Dauren ;
- Keech, Jacob ;
- Fernández-López, María ;
- Stewart, Suzanne ;
- Vaidis, David C. ;
- Besson, Théo ;
- Batres, Carlota ;
- Vaughn, Leigh Ann ;
- Senderecka, Magdalena ;
- Mazzuca, Claudia ;
- Micheli, Leticia ;
- Vasilev, Martin R. ;
- Schmidt, Kathleen ;
- Brick, Cameron ;
- Schivinski, Bruno ;
- Ruiz-Fernandez, Susana ;
- Ilczuk, Ewa ;
- Levitan, Carmel ;
- Higgins, Emily ;
- Pfuhl, Gerit ;
- Lu, Jackson ;
- Sirota, Miroslav ;
- Pavlović, Zoran ;
- Ettore, Ambrosini ;
- Böhm, Nienke ;
- Karaaslan, Aslan ;
- Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta ;
- Öner, Sezin ;
- Baskin, Ernest ;
- Mulgrew, Kate ;
- Ulloa, José Luis ;
- Szumowska, Ewa ;
- Garrido-Vásquez, Patrícia ;
- Barzykowski, Krystian ;
- Kosachenko, Alexandra ;
- Cong, Chin wen ;
- Lamm, Claus ;
- Dumbravă, Andrei ;
- Era, Vanessa ;
- Monteiro, Luis Carlos Pereira ;
- Mallik, Peter ;
- Isloi, Chris ;
- Al-Hoorie, Ali ;
- IRRAZABAL, NATALIA ;
- Pavlov, Yuri ;
- Kuzminska, Anna ;
- Davis, William E. ;
- Fisher, Sarah E. ;
- Helmy, Mai ;
- Valeiro Paterlini, Julia ;
- Huang, Guanxiong ;
- Borghi, Anna ;
- Aczel, Balazs ;
- Stieger, Stefan ;
- Chen, Sau-Chin ;
- Stevens, Laura ;
- Blaison, Christophe ;
- Sanders, Abigail ;
- Ross, Robert ;
- Ingham, Madeleine ;
- Bennett, Tia ;
- Geller, Jason ;
- Coker, Ogeday ;
- Sievers, Erin ;
- Chartier, Christopher R. ;
- Flowe, Heather D. ;
- Colloff, Melissa ;
- Foroni, Francesca ;
- Atkinson, Tess ;
- Kaser, Amanda ;
- Meier, Zdenek ;
- Chisom ARINZE, Nwadiogo ;
- Varga, Marton Aron ;
- Willinger, David ;
- Hayre, Rumandeep K. ;
- Vadillo, Miguel ;
- Loberg, Otto ;
- Paltoglou, Aspasia Eleni ;
- Ribeiro, Gianni ;
- Morariu, Roxana-Elena ;
- Roettger, Timo B. ;
- ERGIYEN, TOLGA ;
- Becker, Maja ;
- Julliard, Yoann ;
- SAHLI, Fatima zahra ;
- Wolfe, Kelly ;
- Malinakova, Klara ;
- Parzuchowski, Michal ;
- ZIdkova, Radka ;
- Novak, Lukas ;
- MacPherson, Sarah E. ;
- Aberson, Christopher ;
- Vanpaemel, Wolf ;
- Angele, Bernhard ;
- Muller, Dominique ;
- Demirag Burak, Elif Gizem ;
- Tavel, Peter ;
- Yavuz, Günce ;
- Lewis, Savannah C.
Publication abstract: Readers continuously receive parafoveal information about the upcoming word in addition to the foveal information about the currently fixated word. Previous research (Inhoff, Radach, Starr, & Greenberg, 2000) showed that the presence of a parafoveal word which was similar to the foveal word facilitated processing of the foveal word. In three experiments, we used the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to manipulate the parafoveal information that subjects received before or while fixating a target word (e.g. news) within a sentence. Specifically a reader’s parafovea could contain a repetition of the target (news), a correct preview of the post-target word (once), an unrelated word (warm), random letters (cxmr), a nonword neighbor of the target (niws), a semantically related word (tale), or a nonword neighbor of that word (tule). Target fixation times were significantly lower in the parafoveal repetition condition than in all other conditions, suggesting that foveal processing can be facilitated by parafoveal repetition. We present a simple model framework that can account for these effects. Subject population: Adults, student
Authors
- Angele, Bernhard ;
- Tran, Randy ;
- Rayner, Keith
Publication abstract: Readers tend to skip words, particularly when they are short, frequent, or predictable. Angele and Rayner (2013) recently reported that readers are often unable to detect syntactic anomalies in parafoveal vision. In the present study, we manipulated target word predictability to assess whether contextual constraint modulates the-skipping behavior. The results provide further evidence that readers frequently skip the article the when infelicitous in context. Readers skipped predictable words more often than unpredictable words, even when the, which was syntactically illegal and unpredictable from the prior context, was presented as a parafoveal preview. The results of the experiment were simulated using E-Z Reader 10 by assuming that cloze probability can be dissociated from parafoveal visual input. It appears that when a short word is predictable in context, a decision to skip it can be made even if the information available parafoveally conflicts both visually and syntactically with those predictions. Subject population: Adults, student
Authors
- Abbott, Matthew J. ;
- Angele, Bernhard ;
- Ahn, Y. D. ;
- Rayner, Keith
Publication abstract: In the boundary change paradigm (Rayner, 1975), when a reader's eyes cross an invisible boundary location, a preview word is replaced by a target word. Readers are generally unaware of such changes due to saccadic suppression. However, some readers detect changes on a few trials and a small percentage of them detect many changes. Two experiments are reported in which we combined eye movement data with signal detection analyses to investigate display change detection. On each trial, readers had to indicate if they saw a display change in addition to reading for meaning. On half the trials the display change occurred during the saccade (immediate condition); on the other half, it was slowed by 15-25 ms (delay condition) to increase the likelihood that a change would be detected. Sentences were presented in an alternating case fashion allowing us to investigate the influence of both letter identity and case. In the immediate condition, change detection was higher when letters changed than when case changed corroborating findings that word processing utilizes abstract (case independent) letter identities. However, in the delay condition (where d' was much higher than the immediate condition), detection was equal for letter and case changes. The results of both experiments indicate that sensitivity to display changes was related to how close the eyes were to the invalid preview on the fixation prior to the display change, as well as the timing of the completion of this change relative to the start of the post-change fixation. Subject population: Adults
Authors
- Slattery, Timothy J. ;
- Angele, Bernhard ;
- Rayner, Keith
Publication abstract: One of the words that readers of English skip most often is the definite article "the". Most accounts of reading assume that in order for a reader to skip a word, it must have received some lexical processing. The definite article is kipped so regularly, however, that the oculomotor system might have learned to skip the letter string t-h-e automatically. We tested whether skipping of articles in English is sensitive to context information or whether it is truly automatic in the sense that any occurrence of the letter string "the" will trigger a skip. This was done using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to provide readers with false parafoveal previews of the article "the". All experimental sentences contained a short target verb, the preview of which could be correct (i.e., identical to the actual subsequent word in the sentence; e.g., "ace"), a nonword ("tda"), or an infelicitous article preview ("the"). Our results indicated that readers tended to skip the infelicitous "the" previews frequently, suggesting that, in many cases, they seemed to be unable to detect the syntactic anomaly in the preview and based their skipping decision solely on the orthographic properties of the article. However, there was some evidence that readers sometimes detected the anomaly, as they also showed increased skipping of the pretarget word in the "the" preview condition. Subject population: Adults, student
Authors
- Angele, Bernhard ;
- Rayner, Keith