Automated Author Profile

Allison, David B.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Current S-Index

17.0

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

1.7

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

10

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

67.5%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

4

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use

This folder contains the data, code, and data dictionary required to reproduce the caffeine pilot study results published in our Psychological Methods manuscript: Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use.

Authors

  • Allison, David B.
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR1.8 Dataset Index
10.3886/e100640v1January 2017

Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use (Version: 1)

This folder contains the data, code, and data dictionary required to reproduce the caffeine pilot study results published in our Psychological Methods manuscript: Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use.

Authors

  • Allison, David B.
1 Citation0 Mentions13% FAIR0.7 Dataset Index
10.3886/e100640v1-11981January 2017

Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use (Version: v1)

This folder contains the data, code, and data dictionary required to reproduce the caffeine pilot study results published in our Psychological Methods manuscript: Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use.

Authors

  • Allison, David B.
1 Citation0 Mentions73% FAIR2.1 Dataset Index
10.3886/e100640v1-160122January 2017

Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use (Version: v1)

This folder contains the data, code, and data dictionary required to reproduce the caffeine pilot study results published in our Psychological Methods manuscript: Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects Under Actual Conditions of Use.

Authors

  • Allison, David B.
1 Citation0 Mentions73% FAIR2.1 Dataset Index
10.3886/e100640v1-160123January 2017

Data from: Cold adaptation increases rates of nutrient flow and metabolic plasticity during cold exposure in Drosophila melanogaster (Version: 1)

Metabolic flexibility is an important component of adaptation to stressful environments, including thermal stress and latitudinal adaptation. A long history of population genetic studies suggest that selection on core metabolic enzymes may shape life histories by altering metabolic flux. However, the direct relationship between selection on thermal stress hardiness and metabolic flux has not previously been tested. We investigated flexibility of nutrient catabolism during cold stress in Drosophila melanogaster artificially selected for fast or slow recovery from chill coma (i.e. cold-hardy or -susceptible), specifically testing the hypothesis that stress adaptation increases metabolic turnover. Using 13C-labelled glucose, we first showed that cold-hardy flies more rapidly incorporate ingested carbon into amino acids and newly synthesized glucose, permitting rapid synthesis of proline, a compound shown elsewhere to improve survival of cold stress. Second, using glucose and leucine tracers we showed that cold-hardy flies had higher oxidation rates than cold-susceptible flies before cold exposure, similar oxidation rates during cold exposure, and returned to higher oxidation rates during recovery. Additionally, cold-hardy flies transferred compounds among body pools more rapidly during cold exposure and recovery. Increased metabolic turnover may allow cold-adapted flies to better prepare for, resist and repair/tolerate cold damage. This work illustrates for the first time differences in nutrient fluxes associated with cold adaptation, suggesting that metabolic costs associated with cold hardiness could invoke resource-based trade-offs that shape life histories.

Authors

  • Williams, Caroline M. ;
  • McCue, Marshall D. ;
  • Sunny, Nishanth E. ;
  • Szejner-Sigal, Andre ;
  • Morgan, Theodore J. ;
  • Allison, David B. ;
  • Hahn, Daniel A.
1 Citation0 Mentions77% FAIR2.2 Dataset Index
10.5061/dryad.d04s0August 2016

High Intensity Interval- vs Moderate Intensity- Training for Improving Cardiometabolic Health in Overweight or Obese Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: To compare the effects of six weeks of high intensity interval training (HIIT) vs continuous moderate intensity training (MIT) for improving body composition, insulin sensitivity (SI), blood pressure, blood lipids, and cardiovascular fitness in a cohort of sedentary overweight or obese young men. We hypothesized that HIIT would result in similar improvements in body composition, cardiovascular fitness, blood lipids, and SI as compared to the MIT group, despite requiring only one hour of activity per week compared to five hours per week for the MIT group. Twenty-eight sedentary overweight or obese men (age, 20 1.5 years, body mass index 29.5 3.3 kg/m2) participated in a six week exercise treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to HIIT or MIT and evaluated at baseline and post-training. DXA was used to assess body composition, graded treadmill exercise test to measure cardiovascular fitness, oral glucose tolerance to measure SI, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess lipoprotein particles, and automatic auscultation to measure blood pressure.

Authors

  • Allison, David B. ;
  • Fisher, Gordon
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR1.6 Dataset Index
10.3886/e100179v1January 2016

High Intensity Interval- vs Moderate Intensity- Training for Improving Cardiometabolic Health in Overweight or Obese Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: To compare the effects of six weeks of high intensity interval training (HIIT) vs continuous moderate intensity training (MIT) for improving body composition, insulin sensitivity (SI), blood pressure, blood lipids, and cardiovascular fitness in a cohort of sedentary overweight or obese young men. We hypothesized that HIIT would result in similar improvements in body composition, cardiovascular fitness, blood lipids, and SI as compared to the MIT group, despite requiring only one hour of activity per week compared to five hours per week for the MIT group. Twenty-eight sedentary overweight or obese men (age, 20 ± 1.5 years, body mass index 29.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2) participated in a six week exercise treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to HIIT or MIT and evaluated at baseline and post-training. DXA was used to assess body composition, graded treadmill exercise test to measure cardiovascular fitness, oral glucose tolerance to measure SI, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess lipoprotein particles, and automatic auscultation to measure blood pressure.

Authors

  • Allison, David B. ;
  • Fisher, Gordon
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR1.6 Dataset Index
10.3886/e53793v1January 2016

High Intensity Interval- vs Moderate Intensity- Training for Improving Cardiometabolic Health in Overweight or Obese Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: To compare the effects of six weeks of high intensity interval training (HIIT) vs continuous moderate intensity training (MIT) for improving body composition, insulin sensitivity (SI), blood pressure, blood lipids, and cardiovascular fitness in a cohort of sedentary overweight or obese young men. We hypothesized that HIIT would result in similar improvements in body composition, cardiovascular fitness, blood lipids, and SI as compared to the MIT group, despite requiring only one hour of activity per week compared to five hours per week for the MIT group. Twenty-eight sedentary overweight or obese men (age, 20 ± 1.5 years, body mass index 29.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2) participated in a six week exercise treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to HIIT or MIT and evaluated at baseline and post-training. DXA was used to assess body composition, graded treadmill exercise test to measure cardiovascular fitness, oral glucose tolerance to measure SI, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess lipoprotein particles, and automatic auscultation to measure blood pressure.

Authors

  • Allison, David B. ;
  • Fisher, Gordon
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR1.6 Dataset Index
10.3886/e55674v1January 2016

High Intensity Interval- vs Moderate Intensity- Training for Improving Cardiometabolic Health in Overweight or Obese Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: To compare the effects of six weeks of high intensity interval training (HIIT) vs continuous moderate intensity training (MIT) for improving body composition, insulin sensitivity (SI), blood pressure, blood lipids, and cardiovascular fitness in a cohort of sedentary overweight or obese young men. We hypothesized that HIIT would result in similar improvements in body composition, cardiovascular fitness, blood lipids, and SI as compared to the MIT group, despite requiring only one hour of activity per week compared to five hours per week for the MIT group. Twenty-eight sedentary overweight or obese men (age, 20 ± 1.5 years, body mass index 29.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2) participated in a six week exercise treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to HIIT or MIT and evaluated at baseline and post-training. DXA was used to assess body composition, graded treadmill exercise test to measure cardiovascular fitness, oral glucose tolerance to measure SI, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess lipoprotein particles, and automatic auscultation to measure blood pressure.

Authors

  • Allison, David B. ;
  • Fisher, Gordon
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR1.6 Dataset Index
10.3886/e55703v1January 2016

High Intensity Interval- vs Moderate Intensity- Training for Improving Cardiometabolic Health in Overweight or Obese Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: To compare the effects of six weeks of high intensity interval training (HIIT) vs continuous moderate intensity training (MIT) for improving body composition, insulin sensitivity (SI), blood pressure, blood lipids, and cardiovascular fitness in a cohort of sedentary overweight or obese young men. We hypothesized that HIIT would result in similar improvements in body composition, cardiovascular fitness, blood lipids, and SI as compared to the MIT group, despite requiring only one hour of activity per week compared to five hours per week for the MIT group. Twenty-eight sedentary overweight or obese men (age, 20 ± 1.5 years, body mass index 29.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2) participated in a six week exercise treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to HIIT or MIT and evaluated at baseline and post-training. DXA was used to assess body composition, graded treadmill exercise test to measure cardiovascular fitness, oral glucose tolerance to measure SI, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess lipoprotein particles, and automatic auscultation to measure blood pressure.

Authors

  • Allison, David B. ;
  • Fisher, Gordon
0 Citations0 Mentions73% FAIR1.6 Dataset Index
10.3886/e55728v1January 2016