Automated Author Profile

Wenhao Hu

Current S-Index

3.4

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.7

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

5

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

21.9%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

2

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Assessing Tuning Parameter Selection Variability in Penalized Regression

Penalized regression methods that perform simultaneous model selection and estimation are ubiquitous in statistical modeling. The use of such methods is often unavoidable as manual inspection of all possible models quickly becomes intractable when there are more than a handful of predictors. However, automated methods usually fail to incorporate domain-knowledge, exploratory analyses, or other factors that might guide a more interactive model-building approach. A hybrid approach is to use penalized regression to identify a set of candidate models and then to use interactive model-building to examine this candidate set more closely. To identify a set of candidate models, we derive point and interval estimators of the probability that each model along a solution path will minimize a given model selection criterion, for example, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion (AIC, BIC), etc., conditional on the observed solution path. Then models with a high probability of selection are considered for further examination. Thus, the proposed methodology attempts to strike a balance between algorithmic modeling approaches that are computationally efficient but fail to incorporate expert knowledge, and interactive modeling approaches that are labor intensive but informed by experience, intuition, and domain knowledge. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Authors

  • Wenhao Hu ;
  • Laber, Eric B. ;
  • Barker, Clay ;
  • Stefanski, Leonard A.
1 Citation0 Mentions13% FAIR0.7 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.7213127January 2018

Assessing Tuning Parameter Selection Variability in Penalized Regression

Penalized regression methods that perform simultaneous model selection and estimation are ubiquitous in statistical modeling. The use of such methods is often unavoidable as manual inspection of all possible models quickly becomes intractable when there are more than a handful of predictors. However, automated methods usually fail to incorporate domain-knowledge, exploratory analyses, or other factors that might guide a more interactive model-building approach. A hybrid approach is to use penalized regression to identify a set of candidate models and then to use interactive model-building to examine this candidate set more closely. To identify a set of candidate models, we derive point and interval estimators of the probability that each model along a solution path will minimize a given model selection criterion, e.g,. AIC, BIC, etc., conditional on the observed solution path. Then models with a high probability of selection are considered for further examination. Thus, the proposed methodology attempts to strike a balance between algorithmic modeling approaches that are computationally efficient but fail to incorporate expert knowledge, and interactive modeling approaches that are labor intensive but informed by experience, intuition, and domain knowledge.

Authors

  • Wenhao Hu ;
  • Laber, Eric B. ;
  • Barker, Clay ;
  • Stefanski, Leonard A.
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.7213127.v1January 2018

Assessing Tuning Parameter Selection Variability in Penalized Regression

Penalized regression methods that perform simultaneous model selection and estimation are ubiquitous in statistical modeling. The use of such methods is often unavoidable as manual inspection of all possible models quickly becomes intractable when there are more than a handful of predictors. However, automated methods usually fail to incorporate domain-knowledge, exploratory analyses, or other factors that might guide a more interactive model-building approach. A hybrid approach is to use penalized regression to identify a set of candidate models and then to use interactive model-building to examine this candidate set more closely. To identify a set of candidate models, we derive point and interval estimators of the probability that each model along a solution path will minimize a given model selection criterion, for example, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion (AIC, BIC), etc., conditional on the observed solution path. Then models with a high probability of selection are considered for further examination. Thus, the proposed methodology attempts to strike a balance between algorithmic modeling approaches that are computationally efficient but fail to incorporate expert knowledge, and interactive modeling approaches that are labor intensive but informed by experience, intuition, and domain knowledge. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Authors

  • Wenhao Hu ;
  • Laber, Eric B. ;
  • Barker, Clay ;
  • Stefanski, Leonard A.
1 Citation0 Mentions56% FAIR1.7 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.7213127.v2January 2018

Conditional Distance Correlation

No description available

Authors

  • Xueqin Wang ;
  • Wenliang Pan ;
  • Wenhao Hu ;
  • Tian, Yuan ;
  • Heping Zhang
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.2064786January 2016

Conditional Distance Correlation

No description available

Authors

  • Xueqin Wang ;
  • Wenliang Pan ;
  • Wenhao Hu ;
  • Tian, Yuan ;
  • Heping Zhang
0 Citations0 Mentions13% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.6084/m9.figshare.2064786.v1January 2016