Automated Author ProfileNicolaus, Marion
Nicolaus, Marion
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 32.2 (sum of 18 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
No description available
Authors
- Mutzel, Ariane ;
- Olsen, Anne-Lise ;
- Mathot, Kimberley ;
- Araya-Ajoy, Yimen ;
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Wijmenga, Jan ;
- Wright, Jonathan ;
- Kempenaers, Bart ;
- Dingemanse, Niels
No description available
Authors
- Mutzel, Ariane ;
- Olsen, Anne-Lise ;
- Mathot, Kimberley ;
- Araya-Ajoy, Yimen ;
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Wijmenga, Jan ;
- Wright, Jonathan ;
- Kempenaers, Bart ;
- Dingemanse, Niels
No description available
Authors
- Kempenaers, Bart ;
- Mutzel, Ariane ;
- Olsen, Anne-Lise ;
- Mathot, Kimberley ;
- Araya-Ajoy, Yimen ;
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Wijmenga, Jan ;
- Wright, Jonathan ;
- Dingemanse, Niels
No description available
Authors
- Mutzel, Ariane ;
- Olsen, Anne-Lise ;
- Mathot, Kimberley ;
- Araya-Ajoy, Yimen ;
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Wijmenga, Jan ;
- Wright, Jonathan ;
- Kempenaers, Bart ;
- Dingemanse, Niels
No description available
Authors
- Mutzel, Ariane ;
- Olsen, Anne-Lise ;
- Mathot, Kimberley ;
- Araya-Ajoy, Yimen ;
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Wijmenga, Jan ;
- Wright, Jonathan ;
- Kempenaers, Bart ;
- Dingemanse, Niels
No description available
Authors
- Mutzel, Ariane ;
- Olsen, Anne-Lise ;
- Mathot, Kimberley ;
- Araya-Ajoy, Yimen ;
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Wijmenga, Jan ;
- Wright, Jonathan ;
- Kempenaers, Bart ;
- Dingemanse, Niels
No description available
Authors
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Barrault, Solange ;
- Both, Christiaan
No description available
Authors
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Barrault, Solange ;
- Both, Christiaan
No description available
Authors
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Barrault, Solange ;
- Both, Christiaan
Parents provisioning their offspring can adopt different tactics to meet increases in offspring demand. In this study, we experimentally manipulated brood demand in free living great tits (Parus major) via brood size manipulations and compared the tactics adopted by parents in 2 successive years (2010 and 2011) with very different ecological conditions. In 2011, temperatures were warmer, there were fewer days with precipitation, and caterpillars (the preferred prey of great tits) made up a significantly larger proportion of the diet. In this “good” year, parents responded to experimental increases in brood demand by decreasing mean inter-visit intervals (IVIs) and reducing prey selectivity, which produced equal average long-term delivery of food to nestlings across the brood size treatments. In 2010, there was no evidence for effects of brood size manipulations on mean IVIs or prey selectivity. Consequently, nestlings from enlarged broods experienced significantly lower long-term average delivery rates compared with nestlings from reduced broods. In this “bad” year, parents also exhibited changes in the variance in inter-visit intervals (IVIs) as a function of treatment that were consistent with variance-sensitive foraging theory: variance in IVIs tended to be lowest for reduced broods and highest for enlarged broods. Importantly, this pattern differed significantly from that observed in the “good” year. We therefore found some support for variance-sensitive provisioning in the year with more challenging ecological conditions. Taken together, our results show that variation in brood demand can result in markedly different parental foraging tactics depending on ecological conditions.
Authors
- Mathot, Kimberley J. ;
- Olsen, Anne-Lise ;
- Mutzel, Ariane ;
- Araya Ajoy, Yimen G. ;
- Nicolaus, Marion ;
- Westneat, David F. ;
- Wright, Jonathan ;
- Kempenaers, Bart ;
- Dingemanse, Niels J.