Automated Author Profile

Fournier, Patrick

Université de Montréal

Current S-Index

11.3

Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets

Average Dataset Index per Dataset

0.4

Average Dataset Index per dataset

Total Datasets

29

Total datasets for this author

Average FAIR Score

29.8%

Average FAIR Score per dataset

Total Citations

13

Total citations to the author's datasets

Total Mentions

0

Total mentions of the author's datasets

S-Index Interpretation

S-Index Over Time

Cumulative Citations Over Time

Cumulative Mentions Over Time

Datasets

Canadian Election Study, 2011 (Version: 3.0)

The 2011 Canadian Election Study consists of 4 waves. Note that each survey wave is a different questionnaire: CPS is the Campaign Period Survey (by telephone), PES is the Post-Election Survey (by telephone), MBS is the Mailback Survey, and WEB is the final Web-based survey.

Authors

  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Cutler, Fred ;
  • Soroka, Stuart ;
  • Deitland Stolle
3 Citations0 Mentions81% FAIR2.0 Dataset Index
10.5683/sp3/ceuscp2023

Canadian Election Study, 2008 (Version: 3.0)

The 2008 Canadian Election Study consists of a survey with nearly 4500 eligible voters conducted during the second half of the election campaign. 3689 of these respondents completed a post-election survey as well. 1238 respondents who had participated in the 2004-2006 panel study were also interviewed after the election. All of the interviews were conducted by telephone. The final component of the study was a self-administered mail-back survey completed by 1939 respondents.

Authors

  • Gidengil, Elisabeth ;
  • Everitt, Joanna ;
  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Nevitte, Neil
2 Citations0 Mentions54% FAIR1.3 Dataset Index
10.5683/sp3/nnc0o62023

Canadian Election Study, 2004-2011 (Version: 3.0)

As a result of the Canadian Federal Election held on Monday June 28, 2004, the Liberal Party formed a minority government. Telephone surveys, conducted during the campaign and after the election with a random sample of Canadians, provide data that can be used to help explain the election outcome. <p>Within 17 months, Canadians again went to the polls and the result of the January 23, 2006 vote was a second minority government, but under the leadership of the Conservative Party. Efforts were made to interview the respondents to the 2004 survey again for the 2006 survey and about one-half of the 2004 survey respondents also answered the 2006 survey. These re-interviews provide a panel or longitudinal sample component where a respondent's answers to questions in the first survey can be compared to those of the second survey. Many of the questions asked in 2004 were repeated in the 2006 survey. The remaining respondents to the 2006 survey were a random sample of Canadians.</p> <p>The 2008 Canadian Election Study consists of a survey with nearly 4500 eligible voters conducted during the second half of the election campaign. 3689 of these respondents completed a post-election survey as well. 1238 respondents who had participated in the 2004-2006 panel study were also interviewed after the election. All of the interviews were conducted by telephone. The final component of the study was a self-administered mail-back survey completed by 1939 respondents.</p> <p>The 2011 Canadian Election Study consists of 4 waves. Note that each survey wave is a different questionnaire: CPS is the Campaign Period Survey (by telephone), PES is the Post-Election Survey (by telephone), MBS is the Mailback Survey, and WEB is the final Web-based survey.</p>

Authors

  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Deitland Stolle ;
  • Soroka, Stuart ;
  • Cutler, Fred ;
  • Blais, André ;
  • Everitt, Joanna ;
  • Gidengil, Elisabeth ;
  • Nevitte, Neil
2 Citations0 Mentions54% FAIR1.2 Dataset Index
10.5683/sp3/jsko1t2023

Canadian Election Study, 2004-2008 (Version: 3.0)

<p>As a result of the Canadian Federal Election held on Monday June 28, 2004, the Liberal Party formed a minority government. Telephone surveys, conducted during the campaign and after the election with a random sample of Canadians, provide data that can be used to help explain the election outcome.</p> <p>Within 17 months, Canadians again went to the polls and the result of the January 23, 2006 vote was a second minority government, but under the leadership of the Conservative Party. Efforts were made to interview the respondents to the 2004 survey again for the 2006 survey and about one-half of the 2004 survey respondents also answered the 2006 survey. These re-interviews provide a panel or longitudinal sample component where a respondent's answers to questions in the first survey can be compared to those of the second survey. Many of the questions asked in 2004 were repeated in the 2006 survey. The remaining respondents to the 2006 survey were a random sample of Canadians.</p> <p>The 2008 Canadian Election Study consists of a survey with nearly 4500 eligible voters conducted during the second half of the election campaign. 3689 of these respondents completed a post-election survey as well. 1238 respondents who had participated in the 2004-2006 panel study were also interviewed after the election. All of the interviews were conducted by telephone. The final component of the study was a self-administered mail-back survey completed by 1939 respondents.</p>

Authors

  • Blais, André ;
  • Everitt, Joanna ;
  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Gidengil, Elisabeth ;
  • Nevitte, Neil
1 Citation0 Mentions81% FAIR0.9 Dataset Index
10.5683/sp3/ssylqh2023

Canadian Election Study, 2004 (Version: 3.0)

As a result of the Canadian Federal Election held on Monday June 28, 2004, the Liberal Party formed a minority government. Telephone surveys, conducted during the campaign and after the election with a random sample of Canadians, provide data that can be used to help explain the election outcome.

Authors

  • Blais, André ;
  • Everitt, Joanna ;
  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Gidengil, Elisabeth ;
  • Nevitte, Neil
2 Citations0 Mentions54% FAIR1.3 Dataset Index
10.5683/sp3/mnpbax2023

Canadian Election Study, 2015 (Version: 2.1)

The 2015 Canadian Election Study consists of 4 waves. Note that each survey wave is a different questionnaire: CPS is the Campaign Period Survey (by telephone), PES is the Post-Election Survey (by telephone), MBS is the Mailback Survey, and WEB is the final Web-based survey.

Authors

  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Cutler, Fred ;
  • Soroka, Stuart ;
  • Deitland Stolle
2 Citations0 Mentions54% FAIR1.3 Dataset Index
10.5683/sp3/mt9q6m2023

Canadian Election Study, 2004-2006 (Version: 3.0)

<p>As a result of the Canadian Federal Election held on Monday June 28, 2004, the Liberal Party formed a minority government. Telephone surveys, conducted during the campaign and after the election with a random sample of Canadians, provide data that can be used to help explain the election outcome.</p> <p> Within 17 months, Canadians again went to the polls and the result of the January 23, 2006 vote was a second minority government, but under the leadership of the Conservative Party. Efforts were made to interview the respondents to the 2004 survey again for the 2006 survey and about one-half of the 2004 survey respondents also answered the 2006 survey. These re-interviews provide a panel or longitudinal sample component where a respondent’s answers to questions in the first survey can be compared to those of the second survey. Many of the questions asked in 2004 were repeated in the 2006 survey. The remaining respondents to the 2006 survey were a random sample of Canadians.</p>

Authors

  • Blais, André ;
  • Everitt, Joanna ;
  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Gidengil, Elisabeth ;
  • Nevitte, Neil
0 Citations0 Mentions81% FAIR0.6 Dataset Index
10.5683/sp3/krxl4v2023

Replication Data for: 'The political phenotype of the disgust sensitive: Correlates of a new abbreviated measure of disgust sensitivity' (Version: 1.0)

These files replicate all analyses in Patrick Fournier, Michael Bang Petersen and Stuart Soroka, 'The political phenotype of the disgust sensitive: Correlates of a new abbreviated measure of disgust sensitivity', forthcoming in Electoral Studies. Analyses of Study #1 were done primarily in R, analyses of Study #2 were done in Stata.

Authors

  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Petersen, Michael Bang ;
  • Soroka, Stuart
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/ymchmu2021

Replication Data for: The psychophysiological correlates of cognitive dissonance (Version: 1.0)

Data and replication code for "The psychophysiological correlates of cognitive dissonance."

Authors

  • Soroka, Stuart ;
  • Gavin W., Gavin ;
  • Dunaway, Johanna ;
  • Fournier, Patrick
0 Citations0 Mentions58% FAIR0.3 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/jnn55b2021

apsr.replication.nb.html

R Markdown output

Authors

  • Fournier, Patrick ;
  • Soroka, Stuart ;
  • Nir, Lilach
0 Citations0 Mentions15% FAIR0.1 Dataset Index
10.7910/dvn/mcefxl/lnl5ni2020