Automated Author ProfileCheruvelil, Kendra S.
Cheruvelil, Kendra S.
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 11.2 (sum of 7 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
We conducted a macroscale study of 2,210 shallow lakes (mean depth ≤ 3m or a maximum depth ≤ 5m) in the Upper Midwestern and Northeastern U.S. We asked: What are the patterns and drivers of shallow lake total phosphorus (TP), chlorophyll a (CHLa), and TP–CHLa relationships at the macroscale, how do these differ from those for 4,360 non-shallow lakes, and do results differ by hydrologic connectivity class? To answer this question, we assembled the LAGOS-NE Shallow Lakes dataset described herein, a dataset derived from existing LAGOS-NE, LAGOS-DEPTH, and LAGOS-CLIMATE datasets. Response data variables were the median of available summer (e.g., 15 June to 15 September) values of total phosphorus (TP) and chlorophyll a (CHLa). Predictor variables were assembled at two spatial scales for incorporation into hierarchical models. At the local or lake-specific scale (including the individual lake, its inter-lake watershed [iws] or corresponding HU12 watershed), variables included those representing land use/cover, hydrology, climate, morphometry, and acid deposition. At the regional scale (e.g., HU4 watershed), variables included a smaller set of predictor variables for hydrology and land use/cover. The dataset also includes the unique identifier assigned by LAGOS-NE(lagoslakeid); the latitude and longitude of the study lakes; their maximum and mean depths along with a depth classification of Shallow or non-Shallow; connectivity class (i.e., whether a lake was classified as connected (with inlets and outlets) or unconnected (lacking inlets); and the zone id for the HU4 to which each lake belongs. Along with the database, we provide the R scripts for the hierarchical models predicting TP or CHLa (TPorCHL_predictive_model.R), and the TP—CHLa relationship (TP_CHL_CSI_Model.R) for depth and connectivity subsets of the study lakes.
Authors
- Cheruvelil, Kendra S. ;
- Webster, Katherine E. ;
- King, Katelyn B. S. ;
- Poisson, Autumn C. ;
- Wagner, Tyler
No description available
Authors
- Fergus, C. Emi ;
- Lapierre, Jean-Francois ;
- Oliver, Samantha K. ;
- Skaff, Nicholas K. ;
- Cheruvelil, Kendra S. ;
- Webster, Katherine ;
- Scott, Caren ;
- Soranno, Patricia
No description available
Authors
- Fergus, C. Emi ;
- Lapierre, Jean-Francois ;
- Oliver, Samantha K. ;
- Skaff, Nicholas K. ;
- Cheruvelil, Kendra S. ;
- Webster, Katherine ;
- Scott, Caren ;
- Soranno, Patricia
No description available
Authors
- Fergus, C. Emi ;
- Lapierre, Jean-Francois ;
- Oliver, Samantha K. ;
- Skaff, Nicholas K. ;
- Cheruvelil, Kendra S. ;
- Webster, Katherine ;
- Scott, Caren ;
- Soranno, Patricia
This dataset includes integrated freshwater abundance and connectivity cluster output, principal component scores, and lake, wetland, and stream abundance and connectivity metrics measured at the Hydrologic Unit 8 (HU8) scale for 17 U.S. states in the Midwest and Northeast regions (appr. 1,800,000 km2). The intent of the cluster analysis is to characterize the macroscale patterns of the integrated freshwater landscape that includes lakes, wetlands, and streams and their surface connectivity attributes. We define freshwater connectivity as the permanent surface hydrologic connections that link lakes, wetlands, and streams and measure connectivity as the landscape position of systems within stream networks. Geographic data used in the analysis are in LAGOS-NE-GEO database v. 1.03 (Lake multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database), an integrated, multi-thematic geographic database (Soranno et al. 2015). The integrated freshwater clusters were created through a multi-step process as follows: 1) we quantified multiple freshwater connectivity metrics for lakes, streams, and wetlands separately, 2) we performed principal components analysis (PCA) on the connectivity metric values for each freshwater type to reduce collinearity, and 3) we performed k-means cluster analysis to group spatial units with similar freshwater connectivity characteristics. The resulting freshwater clusters are representations of the macroscale patterns of freshwater abundance and connectivity in the landscape.
Authors
- Fergus, C. Emi ;
- Lapierre, Jean-Francois ;
- Oliver, Samantha K. ;
- Skaff, Nicholas K. ;
- Cheruvelil, Kendra S. ;
- Webster, Katherine ;
- Scott, Caren ;
- Soranno, Patricia
No description available
Authors
- Soranno, Patricia A. ;
- Cheruvelil, Kendra S.