Automated Author ProfileMunaut, Carine
Munaut, Carine
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 3.3 (sum of 4 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Follicular granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a documented marker of embryo implantation potential. The primary objective was to determine whether follicular G-CSF levels correlate with follicular fluid volume. The secondary objectives were to assess whether follicular G-CSF is associated with oocyte maturity at the time of harvest and with delivery rate after fresh or frozen embryo transfer. Thirty-two patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were recruited (Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée (CPMA), University of Liège, Belgium). A total of 211 follicular fluid (FF) samples were individually collected at the time of oocyte harvest. FF volume was recorded, and G-CSF concentration was assessed by ELISA. The embryos were individually cultured in vitro. Their implantation and live birth rates were recorded after fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The follicular fluid volume did not correlate with the follicular G-CSF concentration. There were no differences in follicular G-CSF levels between mature and immature oocytes. The probability of successful implantation and delivery was increased for embryos with FF containing a high G-CSF concentration. There was a trend toward lower follicular G-CSF levels in cases of miscarriage. Therefore, follicular fluid volume cannot be a substitute for follicular G-CSF as a marker of embryo implantation ability.
Authors
- Noël, Laure ;
- Anne-Françoise Donneau ;
- Jouan, Caroline ;
- Schoenen, Sophie ;
- Lédée, Nathalie ;
- Jean-Michel Foidart ;
- Nisolle, Michelle ;
- Munaut, Carine
Follicular granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a documented marker of embryo implantation potential. The primary objective was to determine whether follicular G-CSF levels correlate with follicular fluid volume. The secondary objectives were to assess whether follicular G-CSF is associated with oocyte maturity at the time of harvest and with delivery rate after fresh or frozen embryo transfer. Thirty-two patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were recruited (Centre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée (CPMA), University of Liège, Belgium). A total of 211 follicular fluid (FF) samples were individually collected at the time of oocyte harvest. FF volume was recorded, and G-CSF concentration was assessed by ELISA. The embryos were individually cultured in vitro. Their implantation and live birth rates were recorded after fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The follicular fluid volume did not correlate with the follicular G-CSF concentration. There were no differences in follicular G-CSF levels between mature and immature oocytes. The probability of successful implantation and delivery was increased for embryos with FF containing a high G-CSF concentration. There was a trend toward lower follicular G-CSF levels in cases of miscarriage. Therefore, follicular fluid volume cannot be a substitute for follicular G-CSF as a marker of embryo implantation ability.
Authors
- Noël, Laure ;
- Anne-Françoise Donneau ;
- Jouan, Caroline ;
- Schoenen, Sophie ;
- Lédée, Nathalie ;
- Jean-Michel Foidart ;
- Nisolle, Michelle ;
- Munaut, Carine
Statistical analyses between the different conditions and treatments. Table S1 and Table S2. Primordial follicular density. Table S3 and Table S4. Density of morphologically normal primordial follicules. Table S5. Density of proliferative granulosa cells between treatments. Table S6. Density of global proliferative cells between treatments. (XLSX 38 kb)
Authors
- Henry, Laurie ;
- Maïté Fransolet ;
- Labied, Soraya ;
- Blacher, Silvia ;
- Marie-Caroline Masereel ;
- Jean-Michel Foidart ;
- Noel, Agnès ;
- Nisolle, Michelle ;
- Munaut, Carine
Statistical analyses between the different conditions and treatments. Table S1 and Table S2. Primordial follicular density. Table S3 and Table S4. Density of morphologically normal primordial follicules. Table S5. Density of proliferative granulosa cells between treatments. Table S6. Density of global proliferative cells between treatments. (XLSX 38 kb)
Authors
- Henry, Laurie ;
- Maïté Fransolet ;
- Labied, Soraya ;
- Blacher, Silvia ;
- Marie-Caroline Masereel ;
- Jean-Michel Foidart ;
- Noel, Agnès ;
- Nisolle, Michelle ;
- Munaut, Carine