Automated Author ProfileSøndergaard Svendsen, M.B.
Søndergaard Svendsen, M.B.
Current S-Index
Sum of Dataset Indices for all datasets
Average Dataset Index per Dataset
Average Dataset Index per dataset
Total Datasets
Total datasets for this author
Average FAIR Score
Average FAIR Score per dataset
Total Citations
Total citations to the author's datasets
Total Mentions
Total mentions of the author's datasets
S-Index Interpretation
The S-Index (Sharing Index) is a comprehensive metric that represents the cumulative impact of all your datasets. It is calculated as the sum of Dataset Index scores across all your claimed datasets.
What it means:
- A higher S-index indicates greater overall impact of your datasets relative to typical datasets in their fields of research
- The S-Index grows as you add more datasets or as existing datasets gain more citations and mentions
- It provides a single number to track your research data impact over time
Current S-Index: 0.9 (sum of 2 datasets Dataset Index scores)
More information here.
S-Index Over Time
Cumulative Citations Over Time
Cumulative Mentions Over Time
Datasets
Background/Aims: Microvascular blood flow is essential for healing and predicts surgical outcome. The aim of the current study was to investigate the relation between fluxes measured with the laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) technique and changes in absolute blood flow. In addition, we studied the reproducibility of the LSCI technique when assessing the intra-abdominal microcirculation of the pig. Methods: During trial 1, a fish gill arch was mechanically perfused with heparinized fish blood under controlled stepwise-altered flow rates alongside mechanically induced movement artefacts. The microcirculation of the fish gill was simultaneously assessed with the LSCI technique. In trial 2, microcirculation was measured in the stomach, liver, and small intestine of 10 pigs by two observers. Results: A linear correlation was observed between flux and volumetric flow. During conditions of no volumetric flow, the high recording speed with the LSCI technique registered the movement artefacts as flow signals. The LSCI measurements showed good correlation and agreement between the two observers when assessing microcirculation in the stomach, liver, and small intestine (r2 = 0.857, 0.956, and 0.946; coefficients of variation = 6.0, 3.2, and 6.4%, respectively). Conclusion: Due to the non-contact and real-time assessment over large areas, LSCI is a promising technique for the intraoperative assessment of intra-abdominal microcirculation. A linear correlation between flux and volumetric flow was found, in accordance with previous experimental studies. However, movement artefacts affect flux measurements, and the choice of the sampling speed must be made with care, depending on the given setting.
Authors
- Ambrus, R. ;
- Strandby, R.B. ;
- Svendsen, L.B. ;
- Achiam, M.P. ;
- Steffensen, J.F. ;
- Søndergaard Svendsen, M.B.
Background/Aims: Microvascular blood flow is essential for healing and predicts surgical outcome. The aim of the current study was to investigate the relation between fluxes measured with the laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) technique and changes in absolute blood flow. In addition, we studied the reproducibility of the LSCI technique when assessing the intra-abdominal microcirculation of the pig. Methods: During trial 1, a fish gill arch was mechanically perfused with heparinized fish blood under controlled stepwise-altered flow rates alongside mechanically induced movement artefacts. The microcirculation of the fish gill was simultaneously assessed with the LSCI technique. In trial 2, microcirculation was measured in the stomach, liver, and small intestine of 10 pigs by two observers. Results: A linear correlation was observed between flux and volumetric flow. During conditions of no volumetric flow, the high recording speed with the LSCI technique registered the movement artefacts as flow signals. The LSCI measurements showed good correlation and agreement between the two observers when assessing microcirculation in the stomach, liver, and small intestine (r2 = 0.857, 0.956, and 0.946; coefficients of variation = 6.0, 3.2, and 6.4%, respectively). Conclusion: Due to the non-contact and real-time assessment over large areas, LSCI is a promising technique for the intraoperative assessment of intra-abdominal microcirculation. A linear correlation between flux and volumetric flow was found, in accordance with previous experimental studies. However, movement artefacts affect flux measurements, and the choice of the sampling speed must be made with care, depending on the given setting.
Authors
- Ambrus, R. ;
- Strandby, R.B. ;
- Svendsen, L.B. ;
- Achiam, M.P. ;
- Steffensen, J.F. ;
- Søndergaard Svendsen, M.B.